Skip to content

· Private foundation

Flynn Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$85k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$385kCivil Rights$195kEducation$107kCrime & Legal$45kArts & Culture$10kHealth$5kCommunity Improvement$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $75k
$15,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$524k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAN ANTONIO PUBLIC LIBRARY$25,000
CENTER FOR JUSTICE AND ACCOUNTABILITY$25,000
ACLU BALDWIN FUND$15,000
AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL USA$10,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
MASINGA FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $47k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Beverly Children's Learning Center: $15k → 10%Beverly Children's Learning Center: $10k → 10%Beverly Children's Learning Center: $7k → 10%Beverly Children's Learning Center: $5k → 10%Beverly Children's Learning Center: $5k → 10%Beverly Children's Learning Center: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
MA
PA
CA
DC
AL
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$737k · 14 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +61% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
6

Total granted

$737k
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+61%
0%

Still filing today

57%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Crime & LegalInternationalHuman ServicesCivil RightsArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF TORTURE
    7× · 2017–2023 · $170k · revenue +61%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR JUSTICE & ACCOUNTABILITY
    4× · 2020–2025 · $110k · revenue +43%
  • OXFAM-AMERICA INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $70k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • PA
    PEN AMERICAN CENTER INC
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
  • PP
    Planned Parenthood of South Texas
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • AA
    A4TE - ADVOCATES FOR EQUALITY
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Washington Office On Latin America

To advance human rights and social justice in the americas.

International
2
Committee to Protect Journalists Inc

The committee to protect journalists promotes press freedom worldwide and defends the right of journalists to report the news safely and without fear of reprisal. cpj ensures the free flow of news and commentary by taking action wherever…

Civil Rights
3
The International Institute On Race Equality and Human Rights

The international institute on race, equality and human rights contributes to the promotion and defense of human rights, through training, technical assistance, advocacy, and strategic litigation conducted at the regional and international…

International
4
Federation for American Immigration Reform

The federation for american immigration reform's (fair) mission is to educate the public about the economic, sociological, environmental, demographic and other effects of mass immigration to the united states.

International
5
American Civil Liberties Union Inc

As noted in its articles of incorporation, the mission of the aclu is "to maintain and advance civil liberties, including, without limitation, the freedoms of association, press, religion and speech, and the rights to the franchise, to due…

—
6
International Bridges to Justice

In recognition of the fundamental principles of the universal declaration of human rights, international bridges to justice (ibj) is dedicated to protecting the basic legal rights of ordinary citizens in developing countries. specifically,…

Crime & Legal
7
Sociedad Interamericana De Prensa Inc

Between 2024 and 2025, the committee on freedom of the press and information, together with its subcommittees on impunity and chapultepecsalta, participated in approximately nine activities. these included a panel discussion entitled…

Education
8
Women's Law Project

Women's law project creates a more just and equitable society by advancing the rights and status of all women throughout their lives. to this end, we engage in high-impact litigation, advocacy, and education. the core values of women's law…

Civil Rights
9
The Center for Reproductive Rights Inc

The center for reproductive rights ("the center") is an international non-governmental organization that uses the power of law to advance reproductive rights as fundamental human rights around the world.

Civil Rights
10
American Civil Liberties Union of the District of Columbia

Preservation of civil liberties through advocacy and lobbying.

—
11
American Civil Liberties Union Fund of the District of Columbia

Preservation of civil liberties through litigation and public education.

—
12
American Civil Liberties Union of South Carolina Foundation Inc

At the aclu of south carolina foundation, we advocate, litigate, educate, and mobilize to defend and advance the civil rights and civil liberties of all south carolinians.

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Center for Justice & Accountability; the most unlike its peers is Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF ILLINOIS: $60,000 · OtherAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF ILLI…SAN ANTONIO PUBLIC LIBRARY: $50,000 · OtherSAN ANTONIO PUBLIC LIBRARYACLU BALDWIN FUND: $40,000 · OtherACLU BALDWIN FUNDAmnesty International USA: $35,000 · OtherAmnesty International USATransgender Legal Def Fund: $25,000 · OtherTransgender Legal Def FundIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBEVERLY PUBLIC LIBRARY: $10,000 · Other+6 more: $25,000 · Other+6 moreTHE CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF TORTURE: $170,000 · InternationalTHE CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF TORTUREOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $70,000 · InternationalOXFAM-AMERICA INCCENTER FOR JUSTICE & ACCOUNTABILITY: $110,000 · Crime & LegalCENTER FOR JUSTICE & ACCOUN…BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE: $45,000 · Crime & LegalBRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN…SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $30,000 · Crime & LegalSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER…BEVERLY CHILDREN'S LEARNING CENTER INC: $47,000 · Human ServicesHUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN INC: $30,000 · Civil RightsPEN AMERICAN CENTER INC: $10,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$260,000International$240,000Crime & Legal$185,000Human Services$47,000Civil Rights$30,000Arts & Culture$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF TORTURE: $170,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetCENTER FOR JUSTICE & ACCOUNTABILITY: $110,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $70,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF ILLINOIS: $60,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetBEVERLY CHILDREN'S LEARNING CENTER INC: $47,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetBRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE: $45,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN INC: $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPEN AMERICAN CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF TORTURE ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR JUSTICE & ACCOUNTABILITY ↗
  • Who funds OXFAM-AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF ILLINOIS ↗
  • Who funds BEVERLY CHILDREN'S LEARNING CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE ↗
  • Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds PEN AMERICAN CENTER INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Flynn Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Flynn Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Oxfam-America Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Flynn Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Flynn Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Flynn Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph