Skip to content
Floyd Ingram Charitable Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Floyd Ingram Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$102k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Youth Development$167kArts & Culture$137kEducation$129kHealth$45kCommunity Improvement$41kRecreation & Sports$29kFood & Nutrition$25kPublic Safety & Disaster$20kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $35k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Evergreen Quest$50,000
Little Theatre on the Bay$14,780
Coquille Valley Elks BPOE 1935$10,000
Coos Bay Schools Community Foundation$10,000
Oregon Coast Community Action$5,000
Myrtle Point Senior Center$4,500
South Coast Clambake Music Festival$4,000
Bay Area Concert Band$3,979
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 16%The Evergreen Quest: $50k → 17%The Evergreen Quest: $50k → 17%The Evergreen Quest: $50k → 17%Oregon Coast Historical Railway: $25k → 17%Oregon Coast Historical Railway: $20k → 17%Oregon Coast Historical Railway: $20k → 17%Marshfield High School: $19k → 17%Coos Bay Schools Community Foundation: $10k → 17%Coos Bay Schools Community Foundation: $10k → 17%Myrtle Point Library Foundation: $48k → 17%Coos Bay Schools Community Foundation: $10k → 17%Myrtle Point Library Foundation: $35k → 17%MHS Charity ProgramCBSC 9: $10k → 17%Myrtle Point Fire Department: $20k → 17%Oregon Coast Historical Railway: $8k → 17%Myrtle Point Senior Center: $20k → 17%Oregon Coast Historical Railway: $6k → 17%Myrtle Crest PTK: $12k → 17%Oregon Coast Community Action: $5k → 17%Coos County Logging Museum: $10k → 17%Oregon Coast Community Action: $5k → 17%Coquille Valley Elks BPOE 1935: $10k → 17%Oregon Coast Community Action: $5k → 17%Myrtle Point Reader Board Inc: $8k → 17%Oregon Coast Historical Railway: $5k → 17%Myrtle Point Senior Center: $5k → 17%South Coast Clambake Music Festival: $4k → 17%FIRST Inc: $2k → 17%Bay Area Concert Band: $4k → 17%FIRST Inc: $2k → 17%Bay Area Concert Band: $4k → 17%Powers Action Team: $12k → 17%Powers Action Team: $8k → 17%Powers Action Team: $6k → 17%Coquille Indian Tribe: $20k → 17%Little Theatre on the Bay: $15k → 17%Coos County Historical Society: $10k → 17%Little Theatre on the Bay: $8k → 17%Coquille Valley Hospital District: $25k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$445k · 10 repeat orgs$164k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
10

Total granted

$445k
$150k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-9%
+18%

Still filing today

50%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Youth DevelopmentArts & CultureEducationHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TE
    THE EVERGREEN QUEST
    3× · 2022–2024 · $150k · revenue -76% · 39% of their budget
  • OC
    OREGON COAST HISTORICAL RAILWAY
    6× · 2017–2023 · $83k · revenue -9% · 45% of their budget
  • MP
    Myrtle Point Library Foundation
    2× · 2021–2023 · $83k

Funded once

  • CV
    COQUILLE VALLEY HOSPITAL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • MP
    Myrtle Point Fire Department
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
  • CI
    Coquille Indian Tribe
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
3/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Myrtle Point Library Foundation: $83,000 · OtherMyrtle Point Library FoundationPOWERS ACTION TEAM: $25,500 · OtherPOWERS ACTION TEAMCOQUILLE VALLEY HOSPITAL DISTRICT: $25,000 · OtherCOQUILLE VALLEY HOSPITAL DISTRICTMyrtle Point Senior Center: $24,500 · OtherMyrtle Point Senior CenterMyrtle Point Fire Department: $20,000 · OtherMyrtle Point Fire DepartmentCoquille Indian Tribe: $20,000 · OtherCoquille Indian TribeMarshfield High School: $19,040 · OtherMarshfield High SchoolMYRTLE CREST PTK: $11,600 · OtherCoquille Valley Elks BPOE 1935: $10,000 · OtherMHS Charity ProgramCBSC 9: $10,000 · OtherCOOS COUNTY LOGGING MUSEUM INC: $10,000 · Other+5 more: $32,979 · Other+5 moreTHE EVERGREEN QUEST: $150,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE EVERGREEN QUESTYOUNG LIFE: $17,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIFEOREGON COAST HISTORICAL RAILWAY: $83,300 · Arts & CultureOREGON COAST HISTOR…Little Theatre on the Bay: $22,280 · Arts & CultureLittle Theatre on t…Coos Bay Schools Community Foundation: $30,000 · EducationOREGON COAST COMMUNITY ACTION: $15,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$291,619Youth Development$167,000Arts & Culture$105,580Education$30,000Housing & Shelter$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE EVERGREEN QUEST: $150,000 over 3y, 39% of budgetOREGON COAST HISTORICAL RAILWAY: $83,300 over 6y, 45% of budgetCoos Bay Schools Community Foundation: $30,000 over 3y, 20% of budgetLittle Theatre on the Bay: $22,280 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $17,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOREGON COAST COMMUNITY ACTION: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOOS COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $9,500 over 1y, 1.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE EVERGREEN QUEST ↗
  • Who funds OREGON COAST HISTORICAL RAILWAY ↗
  • Who funds Coos Bay Schools Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Little Theatre on the Bay ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds OREGON COAST COMMUNITY ACTION ↗
  • Who funds COOS COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ford Family Found…The Oregon Community …Judith Ann Mogan Foun…Amazonsmile Foundation
The Ford Family FoundationOR19.4× affinity7 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ford Family Foundation · The Oregon Community Foundation · Judith Ann Mogan Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Floyd Ingram Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Floyd Ingram Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 85%
  • Oregon Coast Community Action: 85% of income from government
  • Little Theatre on the Bay: 62% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Floyd Ingram Charitable Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Floyd Ingram Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Floyd Ingram’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home