Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Flourish - a Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$928k
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$325k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20222024.

Health$663kEducation$497kPhilanthropy$325kHousing & Shelter$313kFood & Nutrition$208kInternational$180kCommunity Improvement$150kEnvironment$73kOther$0
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $185k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $400k
  • $250k+1 grant · $325k
$25,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$18M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST LOUIS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$325,000
BEYOND HOUSING INC$100,000
WELLSPRING COMMUNITY$50,000
WEPOWER$50,000
LIFT FOR LIFE ACADEMY INC$50,000
DELMAR DEVINE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$50,000
TALL TALES RANCH$50,000
LEARNING ZONE (REAL LIFE COLORADO)$50,000
LITTLE BIT FOUNDATION$30,000
GLOBAL HEALTH CONNECTIONS INC$25,000
PARENTS AS TEACHERS$25,000
STL CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$25,000
FHD MISSIONS HONDURAS$25,000
GUNNISON VALLEY HEALTH FOUNDATION$15,000
EARTHDANCE FARMS$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $340k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 60% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%WELLSPRING COMMUNITY: $50k → 3%TIMOTHY'S MINISTRY: $50k → 7%TIMOTHY'S MINISTRY: $25k → 7%TIMOTHY'S MINISTRY: $10k → 7%THE LITTLE BIT FOUNDATION: $125k → 11%THE LITTLE BIT FOUNDATION: $50k → 11%LITTLE BIT FOUNDATION: $30k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 26% of Flourish - a Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Flourish - a Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 4.0% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.8M · 13 repeat orgs$725k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +25% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
8

Total granted

$1.8M
$187k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+5%

Still filing today

85%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 42% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $538k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementInternationalAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BH
    BEYOND HOUSING INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $228k · revenue +25%
  • LF
    LIFT FOR LIFE ACADEMY INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $225k · revenue +39%
  • TL
    THE LITTLE BIT FOUNDATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $205k · revenue +0%

Funded once

  • PP
    Planned Parenthood Great Rivers-Missouri
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue -55%
  • FT
    FORWARD THROUGH FERGUSON
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -10%
  • PH
    PROJECT HOPE OF GUNNISON VALLEYgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +45%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Missouri Foundation for Health

To eliminate underlying causes of health inequities, transform systems and enable individuals and communities to thrive

Health
2
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
3
Habitat for Humanity of Metro Denver Inc

Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

4
Mission St Louis

Mission: st. louis empowers individuals for social and economic growth through relationships and opportunity.

Community Improvement
5
Dc Greens Inc

DC Greens advances health equity by building a just and resilient food system.

Community Improvement
6
Habitat for Humanity - St Louis

Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope. the organization's vision is a world where everyone has a decent place to live.

Housing & Shelter
7
St Louis Community Foundation

To promote the possibilities of charitable giving, helping charitable citizens understand how they can effectively provide for the community they love and the causes they care deeply about.

Philanthropy
8
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
9
Build Missouri Health

To foster and amplify community-led innovations through partnerships resulting in radical system changes that create equitable health outcomes.

Human Services
10
The Global FoodBanking Network

To nourish the world's hungry through uniting and advancing food banks.

International
11
Foodshot Global Inc

Accelerate the transformation to a healthy, sustainable and equitable food system.

Food & Nutrition
12
Switch4Good

Advancing Health Equity Through Food System Change We are a nonprofit advancing food equity and nutrition security by working at the intersection of public health, education and policy. We start with dairy because of its outsized impact on…

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Planned Parenthood Great Rivers-Missouri and the most unlike its peers is Earthjustice. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 17 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%5%<5yr14%25%5–10yr18%25%10–20yr17%10%20–35yr14%25%35–55yr15%10%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%14%5–10yr18%23%10–20yr17%17%20–35yr14%38%35–55yr15%8%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/23
the rest of the field
14%
3,187/22,549

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
12/23
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ST LOUIS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $325,000 · OtherST LOUIS COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONREAL LIFE COLORADO (AKA THE LEARNING ZONE) — $250,000 · OtherREAL LIFE COLORADO (AKA THE LEARNING ZONE)FHD MISSIONS HONDURAS — $100,000 · OtherFHD MISSIONS HONDURASLEARNING ZONE (REAL LIFE COLORADO) — $50,000 · OtherGlobal Health Connections Inc — $75,000 · OtherGlobal Health Connections IncEARTHJUSTICE — $62,500 · OtherEARTHJUSTICE+10 more — $142,000 · Other+10 moreTALL TALES RANCH — $250,000 · HealthTALL TALES RANCHPlanned Parenthood Great Rivers-Missouri — $50,000 · HealthPlanned Parenthoo…PARENTS AS TEACHERS NATIONAL CENTER INC — $47,500 · HealthPARENTS AS TEACHE…GUNNISON VALLEY HEALTH FOUNDATION — $30,000 · HealthGUNNISON VALLEY H…+2 more — $10,000 · HealthTHE LITTLE BIT FOUNDATION — $205,000 · Human ServicesTHE LITTLE BIT …TIMOTHY'S MINISTRY — $85,000 · Human ServicesTIMOTHY'S MINIS…WELLSPRING COMMUNITY — $50,000 · Human ServicesWELLSPRING COMM…BEYOND HOUSING INC — $227,500 · Housing & ShelterBEYOND HOU…LIFT FOR LIFE ACADEMY INC — $225,000 · Recreation & SportsLIFT FOR L…EarthDance — $150,000 · Food & NutritionURBAN HARVEST STL — $25,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD OUTREACH INC — $22,500 · Food & NutritionWEPOWER — $100,000 · Community ImprovementDELMAR DIVINE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — $50,000 · Community Improvement
Other$1,004,500Health$387,500Human Services$340,000Housing & Shelter$227,500Recreation & Sports$225,000Food & Nutrition$197,500Community Improvement$150,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTALL TALES RANCH — $250,000 over 3y, 7.2% of budgetBEYOND HOUSING INC — $227,500 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetLIFT FOR LIFE ACADEMY INC — $225,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetTHE LITTLE BIT FOUNDATION — $205,000 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetEarthDance — $150,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetWEPOWER — $100,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetTIMOTHY'S MINISTRY — $85,000 over 3y, 20% of budgetGlobal Health Connections Inc — $75,000 over 3y, 32% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE — $62,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPlanned Parenthood Great Rivers-Missouri — $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWELLSPRING COMMUNITY — $50,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetDELMAR DIVINE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetPARENTS AS TEACHERS NATIONAL CENTER INC — $47,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGUNNISON VALLEY HEALTH FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetFORWARD THROUGH FERGUSON — $25,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetPROJECT HOPE OF GUNNISON VALLEY — $25,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetURBAN HARVEST STL — $25,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetFOOD OUTREACH INC — $22,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE OCEAN CLEANUP FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ENTERPRISES — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CAREGIVER CLUB — $5,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetDEAR JACK FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetUntil Theyre Home — $2,500 over 1y, 2.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Louis Community Foundation IncMO25× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation Inc · Trio Foundation of St Louis · St Louis Community Foundation · Moneta Group Charitable Foundation · Washington University · St Louis Philanthropic Organization · Youthbridge Community Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · The Opportunity Trust D/B/A Zest Education · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Flourish - a Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Flourish - a Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Flourish - a Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph