· Private foundation
Florence Nesh Charitable Trust
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $305k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY | $95,000 |
| CHILDRENS RESEARCH INSTITUTE | $60,000 |
| SUBURBAN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| ORTHOBIOLOGICS RESEARCH INITIATIVE | $50,000 |
| ARTHRITIS NATIONAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE | $24,997 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 68% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
12 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY3× · 2019–2025 · $295k · revenue +35%- IHINOVA HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION3× · 2020–2024 · $206k · revenue +8%
- TGThe George Washington University3× · 2019–2024 · $198k · revenue +23%
Funded once
- SHSUBURBAN HOSPITAL INCone grant, 2023 · $70k · revenue +17%
- CNCHILDREN'S NATIONAL HOSPITALone grant, 2023 · $70k
- TUTHE UNIVERSITIES AT SHADY GROVEone grant, 2018 · $68k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland, school of medicine, administrative support services are provided to the physician practices of the university of maryland, including but not limited to information technology,…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sibley Memorial Hospital Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Children's Research Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds INOVA HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The George Washington University ↗
- Who funds CHASE BREXTON HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds WILLS EYE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SIBLEY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SUBURBAN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LuMind IDSC Foundation ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds SUBURBAN HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S NATIONAL ↗
- Who funds ARTHRITIS NATIONAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The Virginia Hospital Center Foundation ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON HOSPITAL CENTER CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S SCHOLARSHIP FUND BALTIMORE ↗
- Who funds DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT ↗
- Who funds WILSON COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds CARLOW UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds NSABP FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ACADEMY OF HOPE ADULT PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds THE SEED SCHOOL OF MARYLAND ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MARYLAND INC ↗
- Who funds Temple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education ↗
- Who funds BALTIMORE MUSEUM OF INDUSTRY INC ↗
- Who funds VINCENTIAN COLLABORATIVE SYSTEM ↗
- Who funds LANCASTER HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds Friends of Patients at the NIH Inc ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
- Who funds SHEPHERDS CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds SO WHAT ELSE INC ↗
- Who funds BREAKTHROUGH OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA ↗
- Who funds CLARION UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Truist Foundation Inc · Clark-Winchcole Foundation · France-Merrick Foundation Inc · The United Way of Central Maryland Inc · Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · The Philadelphia Foundation · The Myrtle Forsha Memorial Trust · The Abell Foundation Inc · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Nora Roberts Foundation · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · Greater Washington Community Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Florence Nesh Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Friends of Patients at the Nih Inc — 26% of income from government
- Baltimore Museum of Industry Inc — 7% of income from government
- Chase Brexton Health Services Inc — 4% of income from government
- Planned Parenthood of Maryland Inc — 0% of income from government
- Suburban Hospital Inc — 0% of income from government
- University of Maryland Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.