Skip to content

· Private foundation

Florence H and Samuel E Mintz Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$21k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Health$13kInternational$12kEducation$12kEnvironment$4kPhilanthropy$3kHousing & Shelter$1kArts & Culture$1kRecreation & Sports$800Other$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$190k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE AND RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC$5,000
MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA DBA DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA$5,000
NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION$3,000
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION INC$3,000
SAVE THE CHILDREN FEDERATION INC$3,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $100) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MASSACHUSETTS HOUSING & SHELTER ALLIANCE: $100 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
MN
IL
NY
MA
OR
CT
CA
VA
MD
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

55%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$27k · 17 repeat orgs$21k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
28

Total granted

$27k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+24%

Still filing today

65%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
InternationalEnvironmentHealthEducationHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    4× · 2020–2025 · $8k · revenue +39%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    2× · 2023–2025 · $4k · revenue +16%
  • NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION
    2× · 2021–2025 · $3k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • WJ
    WILLIAM JAMES COLLEGE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $11k · revenue +62%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICAgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $523 · revenue +35%
  • RP
    ROSIE'S PLACE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $500 · revenue +32%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
Commonwealth Care Alliance Inc

Commonwealth care alliance, inc.'s mission is to improve the health and well-being of people with significant needs by innovating, coordinating and providing the highest quality, individualized care.

Health
3
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
4
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
5
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
6
Mass General Brigham Health Plan Inc

Mass general brigham health plan's mission is to promote the health and wellness of our members, and to help ensure equitable, affordbale health care for the diverse communities we serve.

Health
7
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
8
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
9
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
10
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

—
11
Waterorg

Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

International
12
MRIGlobal

To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medecins Sans Frontieres Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is Cornish Rescue Squad Incorporated. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/35
Grantees still filing
23/35
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $7,150 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED…American Heart Association Inc: $3,523 · HealthAmerican Heart Association In…PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $2,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION…+2 more: $268 · HealthMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $7,800 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES U…Save The Children Federation Inc: $3,000 · InternationalSave The Children Federati…+6 more: $1,000 · International+6 moreWILLIAM JAMES COLLEGE INC: $11,250 · EducationWILLIAM JAMES COLLEGE INC+1 more: $200 · EducationFRIENDS OF TRAINING FIELD PARK: $700 · OtherFRIENDS OF TRAIN…Individual grant recipient: $640 · OtherIndividual grant…CHAPA: $625 · OtherCHAPAWGBH: $608 · OtherWGBHUNITED WAY: $500 · OtherUNITED WAYCITIZENS' HOUSING & PLANNING ASSOCIATION (CHAPA): $500 · OtherCITIZENS' HOUSIN…ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $350 · OtherSMILE TRAIN INC: $250 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA: $523 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLU…MUSIC WITH HEART: $500 · OtherMUSIC WITH HEARTAmerican Planning Association: $276 · Other+14 more: $1,790 · Other+14 moreNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $3,100 · EnvironmentNATIONAL …THE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS: $290 · EnvironmentTHE TRUST…UPPER VALLEY LAND TRUST INC: $200 · EnvironmentCHARLES RIVER CONSERVANCY INC: $200 · Environment+2 more: $200 · EnvironmentCombined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc: $2,100 · PhilanthropyROSIE'S PLACE INC: $500 · Housing & ShelterBOSTON RESCUE MISSION INC: $200 · Housing & Shelter
Health$12,941International$11,800Education$11,450Other$7,262Environment$3,990Philanthropy$2,100Housing & Shelter$700

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWILLIAM JAMES COLLEGE INC: $11,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $7,800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $7,150 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $3,523 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $3,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCombined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc: $2,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA: $523 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROSIE'S PLACE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSIC WITH HEART: $500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS: $290 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Planning Association: $276 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Corps: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUPPER VALLEY LAND TRUST INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CARTER CENTER INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOSTON PUBLIC LIBRARY FUND INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFINCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOSTON RESCUE MISSION INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHARLES RIVER CONSERVANCY INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCare Dimensions Inc: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWALKBOSTON INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS HOUSING & SHELTER ALLIANCE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $68 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Eastern Bank FoundationMA16.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Eastern Bank Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · Liberty Mutual Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Florence H and Samuel E Mintz Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Florence H and Samuel E Mintz Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Mercy Corps: 47% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Care Dimensions Inc: 14% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • William James College Inc: 11% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Reservations: 2% of income from government
  • Rosie's Place Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
  • Oxfam-America Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Florence H and Samuel E Mintz’s filings →

More from the funding graph