Skip to content

· Private foundation

Florence Copper Community Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$49k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$26kArts & Culture$23kEducation$17kHuman Services$14kAnimals$10kHealth$7kRecreation & Sports$7kYouth Development$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$3k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FLORENCE BAPTIST CHURCH FOOD BANK$4,500
Individual grant recipient$4,000
HOPE INTERNATIONAL FOOD PANTRY$2,500
FRIENDS OF APACHE JUNCTION$2,500
SALVATION ARMY CASA GRANDE$2,500
SOUTH FLORENCE FIRE DEPT$2,500
ACTIVE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT FDN$2,225
Individual grant recipient$2,000
CASA GRANDE ALLIANCE$2,000
SALVATION ARMY-APACHE JUNCTION$2,000
FLORENCE FRIENDS OF KIDS FIRST FDN$2,000
KADA'S PROMISE$2,000
FRIENDS OF PINAL PETS$2,000
CENTRAL ARIZONA COLLEGE FDN$2,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HOPE INTERNATIONAL FOOD PANTRY: $3k → 11%HOPE INTERNATIONAL FOOD PANTRY: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of Florence Copper Community Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 98% of the giving stays in AZ; by stated purpose, 86%.

Florence Copper Community Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 6.4% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

53%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$70k · 14 repeat orgs$62k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +71% since the first grant, against +41% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
20

Total granted

$70k
$33k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+71%
+41%

Still filing today

36%
10%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’22’23’24’25
Housing & ShelterAnimalsArts & CulturePhilanthropyHuman ServicesEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FF
    FUTURE FORWARD FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $8k · revenue +71%
  • TC
    THE CENTRAL ARIZONA COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2025 · $5k · revenue +115%
  • PS
    Paladin Sports Outreach
    2× · 2020–2024 · $2k · revenue +265%

Funded once

  • TD
    TIERRA DEL SOL RV RESORT ASSOCIATIO
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • AL
    AMERICAN LEGION POST 9
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • FW
    FLORENCE WOMANS CLUB
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Impact of Southern Arizona

Impact of southern arizona is a private non-profit volunteer based organization which empowers southern arizonans with the resources required to pursue a stabilized and enhanced quality of life.

Community Improvement
2
Empty Bowl Pet Food Pantry Inc

Through pets and community we help people in crisis and disaster to their new norm through resiliency.

Animals
3
Friends of Texas Panhandle Shelter Pets

Friends of Texas Panhandle Shelter Pets is a placement and transport rescue that works with small town panhandle shelters to help animals who are at risk of euthanasia get to rescues where they are adopted and loved.Our volunteers work…

Animals
4
Phoenix Animal Care Coalition PACC911

PACC911 (Phoenix Animal Care Coalition) unites and supports pet rescue organizations throughout Arizona by fostering collaboration and providing critical resources that strengthen lifesaving efforts. Through large well promoted adoption…

Animals
5
Friends of Pinnacle Peak Park

Support operations, volunteers, public education, and capital improvements to Pinnacle Peak Park. Pinnacle Peak Park provides fitness, education, and recreation opportunities for over 250,000 visitors each year.

Recreation & Sports
6
Peppers Pals Rescue

Helping foster dogs heal mentally and physically while they wait for their perfect, forever home. Pepper's Pals Rescue is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization dedicated to fostering homeless, neglected, and medical-needs dogs in the NW…

Animals
7
Powell Animal Welfare Society

Welfare & adoption of animals

Animals
8
Arizona Urban Agriculture Foundation
Food & Nutrition
9
Flagstaff Foodlink Inc

support production & greater access to local food

Food & Nutrition
10
Hope Ranch Animal Sanctuary

Animal rescue

Animals
11
Arizona Site Steward Program Foundation
Education
12
Adelante Comunidad Conejo Inc

It is our mission to bring Conejo Valley Latino voices into important community conversations regarding our schools, city and recreation opportunities. We organize and advocate for those not yet ready to speak on their own behalf and seek…

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Friends of Pinal Pets; the most unlike its peers is Pinal County Historical Society Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
5/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FLORENCE FRIENDS OF KIDS FIRST FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherFLORENCE FRIENDS OF KIDS FIRST FOUNDATIONSOUTH FLORENCE FIRE DEPT: $7,000 · OtherSOUTH FLORENCE FIRE DEPTPEDRO E GUERRO ARTS CENTER: $7,000 · OtherPEDRO E GUERRO ARTS CENTERFRIENDS OF THE CASA GRANDE RUINS: $5,000 · OtherTIERRA DEL SOL RV RESORT ASSOCIATIO: $5,000 · OtherTHE CENTRAL ARIZONA COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $4,700 · OtherFLORENCE FOOD BANK: $4,500 · OtherFLORENCE BAPTIST CHURCH FOOD BANK: $4,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $4,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $4,000 · Other+29 more: $48,725 · Other+29 moreFUTURE FORWARD FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 · Housing & ShelterHope Coalition: $1,000 · Housing & ShelterPINAL COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $5,700 · Arts & CultureHOPE INTERNATIONAL FOOD PANTRY: $5,000 · Human ServicesFriends of Pinal Pets: $2,000 · AnimalsHumane Society of Southern Arizona: $2,000 · AnimalsFRIENDS OF APACHE JUNCTION: $2,500 · Community ImprovementPaladin Sports Outreach: $2,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$104,425Housing & Shelter$8,500Arts & Culture$5,700Human Services$5,000Animals$4,000Community Improvement$2,500Recreation & Sports$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFUTURE FORWARD FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetPINAL COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $5,700 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetHOPE INTERNATIONAL FOOD PANTRY: $5,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetTHE CENTRAL ARIZONA COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $4,700 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetPaladin Sports Outreach: $2,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFriends of Pinal Pets: $2,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetHumane Society of Southern Arizona: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLETS GO COMPOST: $2,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetUNITED WAY OF PINAL COUNTY: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHope Coalition: $1,000 over 1y, 17% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FUTURE FORWARD FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PINAL COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE INTERNATIONAL FOOD PANTRY ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTRAL ARIZONA COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF APACHE JUNCTION ↗
  • Who funds Paladin Sports Outreach ↗
  • Who funds Friends of Pinal Pets ↗
  • Who funds Humane Society of Southern Arizona ↗
  • Who funds LETS GO COMPOST ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF PINAL COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds Hope Coalition ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Florence Copper Community Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Florence Copper Community Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Florence Copper Community Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Florence Copper Community Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Florence Copper’s filings →

    More from the funding graph