Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Florence Copper Community Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$49k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Food & Nutrition$26kArts & Culture$23kEducation$17kHuman Services$14kAnimals$10kHealth$7kRecreation & Sports$7kYouth Development$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$2,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$3k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FLORENCE BAPTIST CHURCH FOOD BANK$4,500
Individual grant recipient$4,000
SOUTH FLORENCE FIRE DEPT$2,500
HOPE INTERNATIONAL FOOD PANTRY$2,500
FRIENDS OF APACHE JUNCTION$2,500
SALVATION ARMY CASA GRANDE$2,500
ACTIVE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT FDN$2,225
CASA GRANDE EDUCATION FDN$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
FLORENCE FRIENDS OF KIDS FIRST FDN$2,000
KADA'S PROMISE$2,000
CENTRAL AZ REGIONAL ECONOMIC DVMT$2,000
SALVATION ARMY-APACHE JUNCTION$2,000
PEDRO E GUERRO ARTS CENTER$2,000
FRIENDS OF PINAL PETS$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–25, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HOPE INTERNATIONAL FOOD PANTRY: $3k → 11%HOPE INTERNATIONAL FOOD PANTRY: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 7% of Florence Copper Community Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 98% of the giving stays in AZ; read by stated purpose it is 86% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Florence Copper Community Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 6.4% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

53%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$70k · 14 repeat orgs$62k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +71% since the first grant, against +41% for the ones you funded once.

14 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
20

Total granted

$70k
$33k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+71%
+41%

Still filing today

36%
10%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’22’23’24’25
Housing & ShelterAnimalsArts & CulturePhilanthropyHuman ServicesEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FF
    FUTURE FORWARD FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $8k · revenue +71%
  • TC
    THE CENTRAL ARIZONA COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2025 · $5k · revenue +115%
  • PS
    Paladin Sports Outreach
    2× · 2020–2024 · $2k · revenue +265%

Funded once

  • TD
    TIERRA DEL SOL RV RESORT ASSOCIATIO
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • AL
    AMERICAN LEGION POST 9
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • FL
    FLORENCE LIONS CLUB
    one grant, 2022 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Impact of Southern Arizona

Impact of southern arizona is a private non-profit volunteer based organization which empowers southern arizonans with the resources required to pursue a stabilized and enhanced quality of life.

Community Improvement
2
Empty Bowl Pet Food Pantry Inc

Through pets and community we help people in crisis and disaster to their new norm through resiliency.

Animals
3
Friends of Texas Panhandle Shelter Pets

Friends of Texas Panhandle Shelter Pets is a placement and transport rescue that works with small town panhandle shelters to help animals who are at risk of euthanasia get to rescues where they are adopted and loved.Our volunteers work…

Animals
4
Phoenix Animal Care Coalition PACC911

PACC911 (Phoenix Animal Care Coalition) unites and supports pet rescue organizations throughout Arizona by fostering collaboration and providing critical resources that strengthen lifesaving efforts. Through large well promoted adoption…

Animals
5
Friends of Pinnacle Peak Park

Support operations, volunteers, public education, and capital improvements to Pinnacle Peak Park. Pinnacle Peak Park provides fitness, education, and recreation opportunities for over 250,000 visitors each year.

Recreation & Sports
6
Peppers Pals Rescue

Helping foster dogs heal mentally and physically while they wait for their perfect, forever home. Pepper's Pals Rescue is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization dedicated to fostering homeless, neglected, and medical-needs dogs in the NW…

Animals
7
Powell Animal Welfare Society

Welfare & adoption of animals

Animals
8
Arizona Urban Agriculture Foundation
Food & Nutrition
9
Flagstaff Foodlink Inc

support production & greater access to local food

Food & Nutrition
10
Hope Ranch Animal Sanctuary

Animal rescue

Animals
11
Arizona Site Steward Program Foundation
Education
12
Adelante Comunidad Conejo Inc

It is our mission to bring Conejo Valley Latino voices into important community conversations regarding our schools, city and recreation opportunities. We organize and advocate for those not yet ready to speak on their own behalf and seek…

Civil Rights

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Friends of Pinal Pets and the most unlike its peers is Pinal County Historical Society Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
5/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FLORENCE FRIENDS OF KIDS FIRST FOUNDATION — $10,000 · OtherFLORENCE FRIENDS OF KIDS FIRST FOUNDATIONSOUTH FLORENCE FIRE DEPT — $7,000 · OtherSOUTH FLORENCE FIRE DEPTPEDRO E GUERRO ARTS CENTER — $7,000 · OtherPEDRO E GUERRO ARTS CENTERTIERRA DEL SOL RV RESORT ASSOCIATIO — $5,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE CASA GRANDE RUINS — $5,000 · OtherTHE CENTRAL ARIZONA COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $4,700 · OtherFLORENCE BAPTIST CHURCH FOOD BANK — $4,500 · OtherFLORENCE FOOD BANK — $4,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $4,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $4,000 · Other+29 more — $48,725 · Other+29 moreFUTURE FORWARD FOUNDATION INC — $7,500 · Housing & ShelterHope Coalition — $1,000 · Housing & ShelterPINAL COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC — $5,700 · Arts & CultureHOPE INTERNATIONAL FOOD PANTRY — $5,000 · Human ServicesHumane Society of Southern Arizona — $2,000 · AnimalsFriends of Pinal Pets — $2,000 · AnimalsFRIENDS OF APACHE JUNCTION — $2,500 · Community ImprovementPaladin Sports Outreach — $2,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$104,425Housing & Shelter$8,500Arts & Culture$5,700Human Services$5,000Animals$4,000Community Improvement$2,500Recreation & Sports$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFUTURE FORWARD FOUNDATION INC — $7,500 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetPINAL COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC — $5,700 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetHOPE INTERNATIONAL FOOD PANTRY — $5,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetTHE CENTRAL ARIZONA COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $4,700 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetHumane Society of Southern Arizona — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPaladin Sports Outreach — $2,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetLETS GO COMPOST — $2,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetFriends of Pinal Pets — $2,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetUNITED WAY OF PINAL COUNTY — $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHope Coalition — $1,000 over 1y, 17% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FUTURE FORWARD FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds PINAL COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds HOPE INTERNATIONAL FOOD PANTRY
  • Who funds THE CENTRAL ARIZONA COLLEGE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF APACHE JUNCTION
  • Who funds Humane Society of Southern Arizona
  • Who funds Paladin Sports Outreach
  • Who funds LETS GO COMPOST
  • Who funds Friends of Pinal Pets
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF PINAL COUNTY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Florence Copper Community Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Florence Copper Community Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Florence Copper Community Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph