· Private foundation
Florence Bullock Ragan Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k4 grants · $11k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $60k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $200k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Church of Jesus Christ of LDS | $50,000 |
| Cirque Lodge Foundation | $50,000 |
| American National Red Cross | $50,000 |
| Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation Inc | $50,000 |
| Brigham Young University | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| Utah Food Bank | $10,000 |
| Friends of Utah County Children's Justice Center | $10,000 |
| Refuge Utah | $10,000 |
| Primary Childrens' Hospital Intermountain Healthcare Foundation Inc | $10,000 |
| Juan Diego Catholic High School | $5,000 |
| University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill | $2,500 |
| Sunshine Acres Children's Home Inc | $2,000 |
| Crossnore School Inc | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $366k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
17 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CLCIRQUE LODGE FOUNDATION8× · 2018–2025 · $350k · revenue +357%
- ANAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches8× · 2018–2025 · $350k · revenue +9%
- IHINTERMOUNTAIN HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC7× · 2018–2025 · $80k · revenue +64%
Funded once
- COCHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAIone grant, 2020 · $35k
- PCPRIMARY CHILDRENS' HOSPITALone grant, 2022 · $20k
- COCROSSROADS OF THE WEST COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 590one grant, 2018 · $4k · revenue -61%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide services to victims and potential victims of child abuse and neglect.
Helping people live the healthiest lives possible.
Ronald McDonald House Mountain West surrounds families with the support they need to be near and care for their seriously ill or injured children.
Manage investment assets for the benefit of the children's center utah located in salt lake city, ut.
We help families experiencing homelessness find lasting independence and security.
Provide mental health services to residents of Cache, Rich, and Box Elder Counties in Utah.
To help homeless pets find their forever home. it includes fostering, medicdal and microchipping them.
Making lives better in southwest utah by providing accessible, quality health care, regardless of financial, language, or cultural barriers.
We serve Utah's children by finding, educating, and nurturing families to meet the needs of children in foster care
Provide housing to low-income families in provo, utah.
Food bank - to assist those families who face the dilemma of paying rent or buying food.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Center for Women and Children in Crisis and the most unlike its peers is Cirque Lodge Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CIRQUE LODGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE UTAH COUNTY CHILDREN'S JUSTICE CENTER ↗
- Who funds INTERMOUNTAIN HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds The Center for Women and Children in Crisis ↗
- Who funds UTAH FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds OUR RESCUE ↗
- Who funds SUNSHINE ACRES CHILDREN'S HOME INC ↗
- Who funds CROSSROADS OF THE WEST COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 590 ↗
- Who funds PROVO ELKS LODGE BENEVOLENT TRUST FUND ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Florence Bullock Ragan Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.