Skip to content

· Private foundation

Five Together Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4.5M
Granted FY2025still arriving
37
Grants FY2025still arriving
13
States reached
$750k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Public Benefit$3.8MEducation$2.9MPhilanthropy$2.4MInternational$2.1MHousing & Shelter$2.0MCrime & Legal$1.7MCivil Rights$1.5MYouth Development$1.5MOther$0
02FY2025 · 37 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $80k
  • $50k–250k29 grants · $2.5M
  • $250k+5 grants · $1.9M
$100,000
Median grant
13
States reached
$43M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIDELITY CHARITABLE GIFT FUND$750,000
EARTH UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$320,490
HIAS AND COUNCIL MIGRATION SERIVICE OF PHILADELPHIA$300,000
COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS$300,000
YOUTH REPRESENT$250,000
SPREAD THE VOTE$150,000
CHANGE SUMMER INC$125,000
HUMBLE DESIGN INC$100,000
OVERTOWN YOUTH CENTER INC$100,000
LEGAL AID SOCIETY$100,000
HISPANICS IN PHILANTHROPY$100,000
JEVS FOUNDATION$100,000
NEW VENTURE FUND$100,000
GIRLS LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE INC$100,000
ABOLITIONIST LAW CENTER$100,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $1.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 72% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LAUREL HOUSE: $15k → 7%LA PUERTA ABIERTA INC: $55k → 22%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF SAN DIEGO: $75k → 11%VOCES DE LA FRONTERA: $60k → 17%PROMISE ARIZONA: $100k → 11%BABY'S BOUNTY: $65k → 13%PREBLE STREET: $50k → 7%BABY'S BOUNTY: $50k → 13%BABY'S BOUNTY: $50k → 13%WEEMA INTERNATIONAL: $25k → 8%A BRIDGE FOR KIDS: $60k → 11%WEEMA INTERNATIONAL: $25k → 8%A BRIDGE FOR KIDS: $60k → 11%A BRIDGE FOR KIDS: $55k → 11%A BRIDGE FOR KIDS: $50k → 11%A BRIDGE FOR KIDS: $50k → 11%HIAS AND COUNCIL MIGRATION SERIVICE OF PHILADELPHIA: $300k → 22%BROAD STREET MINISTRY: $175k → 22%HIAS AND COUNCIL MIGRATION SERIVICE OF PHILADELPHIA: $200k → 22%HIAS AND COUNCIL MIGRATION SERIVICE OF PHILADELPHIA: $115k → 22%HIAS AND COUNCIL MIGRATION SERIVICE OF PHILADELPHIA: $50k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
WA
WI
MI
NY
MA
NV
IN
PA
NJ
CT
CA
VA
MD
AZ
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$20M · 52 repeat orgs$2.9M to everyone else

52 repeat relationships: 26 still active in FY2025, 26 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

52
33

Total granted

$20M
$2.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+48%

Still filing today

81%
76%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $635k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCivil RightsInternationalYouth DevelopmentEducationCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +95%
  • AY
    AGAHOZO-SHALOM YOUTH VILLAGE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +109%
  • EARTH University Foundation Inc
    7× · 2019–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCHgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $250k · revenue +95%
  • RE
    RISE EDUCATION FUND
    one grant, 2023 · $190k
  • BROAD STREET MINISTRY
    one grant, 2020 · $175k · revenue -84%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Center for Research On Women

The international center for research for women (icrw) is a global research institute, with a mission to advance rights and opportunities for women, girls, and structurally excluded populations with actionable evidence and solutions.

International
2
Upturn Inc

Upturn advances equity and justice in the design, governance, and use of technology.

—
3
Accion International

Our mission is to create a fair and inclusive economy where underserved people have quality financial choices and opportunities to improve their economic well-being. we find and help build innovative companies with the potential to reach…

International
4
Pro Publica Inc

Pro publica is an independent, non-profit, pulitzer prize-winning newsroom that produces investigative journalism in the public interest. our work focuses exclusively on truly important stories. [see continuation on schedule o] we produce…

Arts & Culture
5
Democracy Works Inc

The organization's mission is to leverage web-technologies to improve civic engagement and voter education.

Civil Rights
6
Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education
7
Partnership for Public Service Inc

Making our government work better is a daunting task, and we are a small organization seeking to transform a government that employs millions of civilians and manages trillions of dollars in taxpayer revenue needed to protect public…

Employment
8
Common Future

Common future is a network of pioneering leaders across the u.s. and canada who work deeply within their communities to create alternative approaches to business, philanthropy, and investing. we envision an economy that has transitioned…

Community Improvement
9
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
10
Common Impact Inc

Common impact's mission is to strengthen the capacity of social change organizations, enabling them to better run and scale their programs. through its partnership with companies, common impact taps into the business skills and expertise…

Unclassified
11
Womens Funding Network

Our mission as a global alliance is to provide strategies, research, and resources that support the critical agency and influence of women's foundations and gender justice funders in the movement for equality, justice, and power for all.

Education
12
Voteamerica

The mission of voteamerica is to strengthen united states democracy by increasing voter turnout.

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Venture Fund; the most unlike its peers is New York University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

85 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 85 of the 102 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
21
Early backer (in before they grew)
84/85
Grantees still filing
57/85
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MOVEMENT VOTER FUND AT THE TIDES FOUNDATION: $2,000,000 · OtherMOVEMENT VOTER FUND AT THE TIDES FOUNDATIONCOALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $1,420,000 · OtherCOALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INCHISPANICS IN PHILANTHROPY: $575,000 · OtherGENERATION CITIZEN INC: $670,500 · OtherFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $1,250,000 · OtherFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUNDTHE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $800,000 · OtherTHE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INCHumble Design Inc: $440,000 · OtherJEVS FOUNDATION: $673,000 · OtherGirls Leadership Institute Inc dba Girls Leadership: $516,000 · Other+43 more: $4,662,500 · Other+43 moreEARTH University Foundation Inc: $1,298,531 · InternationalEARTH Universi…RESONATE WORKSHOPS: $542,500 · InternationalRESONATE WORKS…UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $400,000 · InternationalUNITED STATES …AMIGOS OF COSTA RICA INC: $361,000 · InternationalAMIGOS OF COST…PANORAMA GLOBAL: $315,000 · InternationalPANORAMA GLOBA…REFUGEPOINT INC: $200,000 · InternationalREFUGEPOINT IN…SEEDS OF PEACE INC: $150,000 · International+3 more: $195,000 · International+3 moreYOUTH REPRESENT INC: $1,065,000 · Crime & LegalYOUTH REP…THE LEGAL AID SOCIETY: $760,000 · Crime & LegalTHE LEGAL…YOUTH SENTENCING & REENTRY PROJECT INC: $265,000 · Crime & LegalYOUTH SEN…ABOLITIONIST LAW CENTER: $200,000 · Crime & LegalABOLITION…AGAHOZO-SHALOM YOUTH VILLAGE INC: $1,390,000 · EducationAGAHOZO-S…SADIE NASH LEADERSHIP PROJECT INC: $486,000 · EducationSADIE NAS…NEW AMERICAN LEADERS INC: $125,000 · EducationNEW AMERI…MONARCH SCHOOL PROJECT: $75,000 · Education+1 more: $50,000 · EducationSPREAD THE VOTE INC: $465,000 · Civil RightsVOTER FORMATION PROJECT: $415,000 · Civil RightsMOTHERING JUSTICE: $265,000 · Civil RightsNEW VOICES PITTSBURGH INC: $216,000 · Civil RightsDemocracy North Carolina: $169,500 · Civil RightsVOTERIDERS: $150,000 · Civil RightsARIZONA CENTER FOR EMPOWERMENT: $105,000 · Civil RightsNEW GEORGIA PROJECT INC: $100,000 · Civil RightsAFRICAN FAMILY HEALTH ORGANIZATION: $75,000 · Civil Rights+2 more: $20,000 · Civil RightsTIDES FOUNDATION: $1,050,000 · PhilanthropyPROJECT AKILAH INC: $300,000 · PhilanthropyMICHIGAN ORGANIZING PROJECT: $150,000 · PhilanthropyRISE EDUCATION FUND: $125,000 · PhilanthropyROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC: $100,000 · PhilanthropyAmalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc: $75,000 · Philanthropy+3 more: $160,000 · PhilanthropyHIAS and Council Migration Service of Philadelphia Inc: $665,000 · Human ServicesA BRIDGE FOR KIDS: $275,000 · Human ServicesBROAD STREET MINISTRY: $175,000 · Human ServicesBABY'S BOUNTY: $165,000 · Human ServicesPROMISE ARIZONA: $100,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO: $75,000 · Human ServicesVOCES DE LA FRONTERA INC: $60,000 · Human Services+4 more: $170,000 · Human Services
Other$13,007,000International$3,462,031Crime & Legal$2,290,000Education$2,126,000Civil Rights$1,980,500Philanthropy$1,960,000Human Services$1,685,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $1,420,000 over 9y, 1.6% of budgetAGAHOZO-SHALOM YOUTH VILLAGE INC: $1,390,000 over 9y, 7.2% of budgetEARTH University Foundation Inc: $1,298,531 over 7y, 3.6% of budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $1,250,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH REPRESENT INC: $1,065,000 over 5y, 11% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION: $1,050,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $800,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetTHE LEGAL AID SOCIETY: $760,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetJEVS FOUNDATION: $673,000 over 5y, 20% of budgetGENERATION CITIZEN INC: $670,500 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetHIAS and Council Migration Service of Philadelphia Inc: $665,000 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetHISPANICS IN PHILANTHROPY: $575,000 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetRESONATE WORKSHOPS: $542,500 over 8y, 21% of budgetGirls Leadership Institute Inc dba Girls Leadership: $516,000 over 6y, 5.5% of budgetSADIE NASH LEADERSHIP PROJECT INC: $486,000 over 7y, 6.1% of budgetSPREAD THE VOTE INC: $465,000 over 5y, 26% of budgetHumble Design Inc: $440,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetVOTER FORMATION PROJECT: $415,000 over 2y, 8.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $400,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOVERTOWN YOUTH CENTER INC: $370,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetAMIGOS OF COSTA RICA INC: $361,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetAVESTA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $325,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetPANORAMA GLOBAL: $315,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetPROJECT AKILAH INC: $300,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetA BRIDGE FOR KIDS: $275,000 over 5y, 16% of budgetMOTHERING JUSTICE: $265,000 over 2y, 6.6% of budgetYOUTH SENTENCING & REENTRY PROJECT INC: $265,000 over 4y, 3.7% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $250,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTRATEGIES FOR YOUTH: $240,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetNEW VOICES PITTSBURGH INC: $216,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetABOLITIONIST LAW CENTER: $200,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetREFUGEPOINT INC: $200,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetTHE SHADE TREE INC: $177,500 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetBROAD STREET MINISTRY: $175,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetDemocracy North Carolina: $169,500 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetBABY'S BOUNTY: $165,000 over 3y, 5.7% of budgetMICHIGAN ORGANIZING PROJECT: $150,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetVOTERIDERS: $150,000 over 3y, 18% of budgetSEEDS OF PEACE INC: $150,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetJEVS HUMAN SERVICES: $140,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRISE EDUCATION FUND: $125,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetJACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK: $125,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetIMPACT SERVICES CORPORATION: $116,500 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $105,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetARIZONA CENTER FOR EMPOWERMENT: $105,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetNEW GEORGIA PROJECT INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPROMISE ARIZONA: $100,000 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetACLU FOUNDATION OF SAN DIEGO & IMPERIAL COUNTIES: $100,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
  • Who funds AGAHOZO-SHALOM YOUTH VILLAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds EARTH University Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH REPRESENT INC ↗
  • Who funds TIDES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LEGAL AID SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds JEVS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GENERATION CITIZEN INC ↗
  • Who funds HIAS and Council Migration Service of Philadelphia Inc ↗
  • Who funds HISPANICS IN PHILANTHROPY ↗
  • Who funds RESONATE WORKSHOPS ↗
  • Who funds Girls Leadership Institute Inc dba Girls Leadership ↗
  • Who funds SADIE NASH LEADERSHIP PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds SPREAD THE VOTE INC ↗
  • Who funds Humble Design Inc ↗
  • Who funds VOTER FORMATION PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds OVERTOWN YOUTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds AMIGOS OF COSTA RICA INC ↗
  • Who funds AVESTA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds PANORAMA GLOBAL ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT AKILAH INC ↗
  • Who funds A BRIDGE FOR KIDS ↗
  • Who funds MOTHERING JUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH SENTENCING & REENTRY PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds STRATEGIES FOR YOUTH ↗
  • Who funds NEW VOICES PITTSBURGH INC ↗
  • Who funds ABOLITIONIST LAW CENTER ↗
  • Who funds REFUGEPOINT INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SHADE TREE INC ↗
  • Who funds BROAD STREET MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds Democracy North Carolina ↗
  • Who funds BABY'S BOUNTY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Amalgamated Charitable Foundation IncDC36× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Tides Foundation · Impactassetsinc · NEO Philanthropy Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · New Venture Fund · Foundation to Promote Open Society · The Miami Foundation Inc · The Ford Foundation · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · The Overbrook Foundation · United States Energy Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Five Together Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Five Together Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 68%
  • Laurel House Inc: 68% of income from government
  • Strategies for Youth: 21% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
23report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Five Together Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Five Together Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 102 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Five Together’s filings →

More from the funding graph