Skip to content
Fisher-Titus Medical Center at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Fisher-Titus Medical Center

Deliver compassionate and convenient care to the highest level of excellence that promotes lifelong health and wellness for our community.

$677k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$252k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$501kRecreation & Sports$396kEmployment$299kPublic Safety & Disaster$178kEducation$137kCommunity Improvement$67kPhilanthropy$60kYouth Development$10k
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $574,761, the rows itemized in this filing. The $677,192 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $102,431 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $303k
  • $250k+1 grant · $252k
$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$237M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EHOVE CAREER CENTER$252,110
TERRA STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE$129,317
MAGRUDER HOSPITAL$73,334
WESTERN RESERVE ATHLETIC BOOSTERS$50,000
MONROEVILLE ATHLETIC BOOSTERS$50,000
NORWALK AREA UNITED FUND$10,000
HURON COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MAGRUDER HOSPITAL: $186k → 10%EHOVE CAREER CENTER: $252k → 11%BGSU FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 12%TERRA STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $129k → 12%VILLAGE OF WAKEMAN: $25k → 13%MAGRUDER HOSPITAL: $73k → 10%EHOVE CAREER CENTER: $15k → 11%BGSU FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 12%TERRA STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $32k → 12%VILLAGE OF WAKEMAN: $15k → 13%BGSU FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 12%NEW LONDON GREENWICH RAIL TRAIL: $12k → 13%NEW LONDON PARKS & REC: $14k → 13%WESTERN RESERVE ATHLETIC BOOSTERS: $50k → 13%WESTERN RESERVE ATHLETIC BOOSTERS: $50k → 13%MONROEVILLE ATHLETIC BOOSTERS: $50k → 13%MONROEVILLE ATHLETIC BOOSTERS: $50k → 13%FISHER TITUS FOUNDATION: $101k → 13%FISHER TITUS FOUNDATION: $89k → 13%FISHER TITUS FOUNDATION: $77k → 13%CITY OF NORWALK - PARKS & RECREATION: $50k → 13%NORWALK AREA FRIENDS OF YOUTH SPORT: $50k → 13%FISHER TITUS FOUNDATION: $50k → 13%FISHER TITUS FOUNDATION: $28k → 13%FISHER TITUS FOUNDATION: $25k → 13%NORWALK ATHLETIC BOOSTER: $20k → 13%NORWALK AREA UNITED FUND: $20k → 13%FISHER TITUS FOUNDATION: $20k → 13%NORWALK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: $18k → 13%NORWALK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP: $13k → 13%NORWALK AREA UNITED FUND: $10k → 13%NORWALK AREA UNITED FUND: $10k → 13%NORWALK AREA UNITED FUND: $10k → 13%RESTORE NORWALK: $10k → 13%HURON COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $10k → 13%NORWALK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP: $10k → 13%NORWALK AREA UNITED FUND: $10k → 13%NORWALK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP: $9k → 13%NORWALK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP: $8k → 13%NORWALK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: $8k → 13%TEEN LEADERSHIP CORPS: $5k → 13%TEEN LEADERSHIP CORPS: $5k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 10 repeat orgs$166k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
6

Total granted

$1.5M
$156k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-7%
-4%

Still filing today

70%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationRecreation & SportsCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyHealthCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HB
    H B MAGRUDER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
    2× · 2023–2024 · $259k · revenue +5%
  • NA
    NORWALK AREA UNITED FUND
    5× · 2017–2024 · $60k · revenue +46%
  • BG
    Bowling Green State University Foundation Inc
    3× · 2017–2019 · $30k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • CO
    CITY OF NORWALK - PARKS & RECREATION
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
  • NA
    NORWALK AREA FRIENDS FOR YOUTH SPORTS INC
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue -83% · 30% of their budget
  • NH
    NORWALK HIGH SCHOOL ATHELTIC BOOSTE
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue -4%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Huron County Development Council

Strengthen industrial operations in huron county, ohio

Community Improvement
2
Norwalk Activity Boosters

Support of norwalk community school district activities

Education
3
Akron-Westfield Athletic Booster

To lessen the general public's burden of supporting local high school athletics.

Education
4
Norwalk Harbor Keeper
—
5
Troy Area Chamber of Commerce

Empowering prosperity for troy, ohio

—
6
Wooster All-Sports Booster Club

To promote and support wooster high school athletic teams and the student athletes who play on those teams.

—
7
Norwalk High School Parents Club
Education
8
Ohio Business Leadership Network
—
9
Greater Norwalk Chamber of Commerce Inc

Promotion and support of commercial & civic awareness and activities in the greater norwalk area.

Community Improvement
10
Northwood High School Athletic Booster Club

Fundraising support for Northwood High Schools 25 athletic teams

Education
11
Norton Bicentennial Incorporated

To facilitate acquistition of real property to be dedicated to use as a public park in the city of bucyrus, ohio.

Recreation & Sports
12
Portage Development Board

To coordinate and promote economic development on a county wide basis among all of the political subdivisions of portage county, ohio.

Public Benefit
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bowling Green State University Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is New London Greenwich Rail - Trail. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
4/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FISHER-TITUS AFFILIATED SERVICES: $389,947 · OtherFISHER-TITUS AFFILIATED SERVICESEHOVE EDUCATION ASSOCIATION: $266,878 · OtherEHOVE EDUCATION ASSOCIATIONTERRA STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $161,098 · OtherTERRA STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGECITY OF NORWALK - PARKS & RECREATION: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $40,000 · Other+3 more: $34,385 · OtherH B MAGRUDER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $259,480 · HealthH B MAGRUDER MEMO…WESTERN RESERVE ATHLETIC BOOSTER CLUB INC: $200,000 · EducationWESTERN RESERVE …Bowling Green State University Foundation Inc: $30,000 · EducationBowling Green St…TEEN LEADERSHIP CORPS: $10,000 · EducationHURON COUNTY GROWTH PARTNERHIP CHARITIES: $64,320 · Community ImprovementNORWALK AREA FRIENDS FOR YOUTH SPORTS INC: $50,000 · Recreation & SportsNew London Greenwich Rail - Trail: $11,720 · Recreation & SportsNORWALK AREA UNITED FUND: $60,000 · PhilanthropyNORWALK HIGH SCHOOL ATHELTIC BOOSTE: $20,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$942,308Health$259,480Education$240,000Community Improvement$64,320Recreation & Sports$61,720Philanthropy$60,000Crime & Legal$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFISHER-TITUS AFFILIATED SERVICES: $389,947 over 7y, 1.9% of budgetH B MAGRUDER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $259,480 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetWESTERN RESERVE ATHLETIC BOOSTER CLUB INC: $200,000 over 2y, 35% of budgetHURON COUNTY GROWTH PARTNERHIP CHARITIES: $64,320 over 5y, 7.9% of budgetNORWALK AREA UNITED FUND: $60,000 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetNORWALK AREA FRIENDS FOR YOUTH SPORTS INC: $50,000 over 1y, 30% of budgetBowling Green State University Foundation Inc: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNORWALK HIGH SCHOOL ATHELTIC BOOSTE: $20,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetHURON COUNTY GROWTH PARTNERSHIP: $10,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetTEEN LEADERSHIP CORPS: $10,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

John F & Doris E Erns…The Twenty First Cent…Amazonsmile Foundation
John F & Doris E Ernsthausen FoundationOH13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: John F & Doris E Ernsthausen Foundation · The Twenty First Century Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fisher-Titus Medical Center funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fisher-Titus Medical Center. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Fisher-Titus Medical Center’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home