Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Fischer Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$171k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Religion$619kEducation$360kHousing & Shelter$25kHealth$20kFood & Nutrition$20kHuman Services$10k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $11k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $160k
$60,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$46k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KINGDOM WORKERS$100,000
LEWIS AND CLARK COLLEGE$60,000
ST PETER'S LUTHERAN CHURCH$6,000
TIME OF GRACE$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%BETHESDA CARES: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$679k · 4 repeat orgs$375k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +19% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
8

Total granted

$679k
$370k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+13%

Still filing today

75%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionEducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WE
    WISCONSIN EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN SYNOD KINGDOM WORKERS INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $470k · revenue +35%
  • LEWIS & CLARK COLLEGE
    3× · 2021–2024 · $175k · revenue +19%
  • YR
    YELLOW RIBBON FUND INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $10k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • DS
    DIVINE SAVIOR ACADEMY-SANTA RITA RANCH
    one grant, 2021 · $150k
  • TC
    THE CHAPEL AT OCEAN REEF FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $100k
  • WISCONSIN LUTHERAN COLLEGE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $35k · revenue +10%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Covenant House Washington Dc

Covenant house washington, dc ("chw") provides shelter, crisis care, community services, and outreach services to youth in the washington dc area.

Human Services
2
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
3
Cornerstone Montgomery

Empowering people living with mental health and substance use disorders to thrive in their community through collaboration, treatment, education and advocacy.

4
William Jessup University

In partnership with the church, the purpose of william jessup university is to educate transformational leaders for the glory of god.

5
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
6
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
7
Adventist Healthcare Inc

We extend god's care through the ministry of physical, mental and spiritual healing.

8
Washington County Commission On Aging Inc/Area Agency On Aging

To plan and coordinate systems of services which help older americans, those with disabilities regardless of age and caregivers, maintain their independence through a variety of programs. these programs include, but are not limited to,…

9
Endicott College

Endicott college offers students a vibrant academic environment that remains true to its founding principle of integrating professional and liberal arts with experiential learning. for more information see schedule o.

Education
10
Youthbuild Dc Public Charter School Inc

Youthbuild pcs seeks to transform the lives of disconnected youth by offering a program, in english and spanish, that combines rigorous academic instruction with vocational training, life and employability skills- building, and community…

Education
11
Newberry College

Newberry college challenges and nurtures students for lifetimes of service and leadership through intellectual transformation, social development, a culture of physical well being, and spiritual growth by providing a christian education in…

Education
12
Southwest Baptist University

Christ-centered, caring academic community preparing students to be servant leaders in a global society; a higher-education institution offering courses that lead to both undergraduate and graduate degrees.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod Kingdom Workers Inc and the most unlike its peers is Lewis & Clark College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WISCONSIN EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN SYNOD KINGDOM WORKERS INC — $470,000 · ReligionWISCONSIN EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN SYNOD KINGDOM WORKERS …INTERFAITH WORKS — $20,000 · Religion+1 more — $5,000 · ReligionDIVINE SAVIOR ACADEMY-SANTA RITA RANCH — $150,000 · OtherDIVINE SAVIOR ACADEMY-SANTA RITA RANC…THE CHAPEL AT OCEAN REEF FOUNDATION — $100,000 · OtherTHE CHAPEL AT OCEAN REEF FOUNDATIONWISCONSIN LUTHERAN COLLEGE INC — $35,000 · OtherWISCONSIN LUTHERAN COLLEGE INCST PETER'S LUTHERAN CHURCH — $24,000 · OtherST PETER'S LUTHERAN CHURCHHENRY M JACKSON FOUNDATION-STRATEGIC INITIATIVES — $20,000 · OtherHENRY M JACKSON FOUNDATION-STRATEGIC …SOME INC — $20,000 · OtherSOME INCLEWIS & CLARK COLLEGE — $175,000 · EducationLEWIS & CLARK COLL…CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC — $20,000 · Food & NutritionYELLOW RIBBON FUND INC — $10,000 · PhilanthropyBETHESDA CARES INC — $5,000 · Human Services
Religion$495,000Other$349,000Education$175,000Food & Nutrition$20,000Philanthropy$10,000Human Services$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWISCONSIN EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN SYNOD KINGDOM WORKERS INC — $470,000 over 4y, 3.4% of budgetLEWIS & CLARK COLLEGE — $175,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWISCONSIN LUTHERAN COLLEGE INC — $35,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINTERFAITH WORKS — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOME INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYELLOW RIBBON FUND INC — $10,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBETHESDA CARES INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTIME OF GRACE MINISTRY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH12.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Fischer Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 4%
  • Bethesda Cares Inc100% of income from government
  • Interfaith Works4% of income from government
  • Lewis & Clark College2% of income from government
  • Yellow Ribbon Fund Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph