Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

First Steps Kent

To create a coordinated, integrated system of early childhood services that supports all families in kent county so every young child in kent county will enter kindergarten ready to succeed in school and in life.

$10.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$1.3M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$8.8MEducation$5.7MCrime & Legal$4.0MHuman Services$2.7MPublic Benefit$2.1MHousing & Shelter$1.7MYouth Development$1.0MSocial Science$329kOther$0
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $112k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $826k
  • $250k+13 grants · $9.1M
$318,658
Median grant
4
States reached
$4.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FAMILY FUTURES$1,281,697
KENT COUNTY$1,221,922
KENT INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL DISTRICT$1,220,605
HEALTH NET OF WEST MICHIGAN$1,031,865
ARBOR CIRCLE$918,557
COREWELL HEALTH$786,193
GRAND RAPIDS COMMUNITY COLLEGE$457,116
CHERRY STREET HEALTH SERVICES$451,807
HEALTHY HOMES COALITION OF WEST MICHIGAN$380,193
READY FOR SCHOOL$360,725
BETHANY CHRISTIAN SERVICES$318,658
VIBRANT FUTURES$314,879
FAMILY PROMISE$310,277
MOMSBLOOM$245,352
YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER GRAND RAPIDS$152,156
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $4.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%EASTERSEALS MICHIGAN: $241k → 8%BETHANY CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $319k → 16%EASTERSEALS MICHIGAN: $54k → 8%BETHANY CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $212k → 16%EASTER SEALS MICHIGAN: $41k → 8%BETHANY CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $71k → 16%EASTER SEALS MICHIGAN: $28k → 8%YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER GRAND RAPIDS: $152k → 11%ARBOR CIRCLE: $919k → 11%ARBOR CIRCLE: $642k → 11%ARBOR CIRCLE: $135k → 11%ARBOR CIRCLE: $96k → 11%VIBRANT FUTURES: $378k → 11%VIBRANT FUTURES: $315k → 11%WEST MICHIGAN PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN: $265k → 11%VIBRANT FUTURES: $212k → 11%HISPANIC CENTER OF WESTERN MICHIGAN: $145k → 11%VIBRANT FUTURES: $129k → 11%HISPANIC CENTER OF WESTERN MICHIGAN: $101k → 11%WEST MICHIGAN PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN: $69k → 11%HISPANIC CENTER OF WESTERN MICHIGAN: $59k → 11%WEST MICHIGAN PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN: $44k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$26M · 24 repeat orgs$152k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +36% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.

24 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
1

Total granted

$26M
$152k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+21%

Still filing today

71%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $152k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’23’24
Human ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterCrime & LegalEducationCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FF
    FAMILY FUTURES
    5× · 2020–2024 · $4.0M · revenue +113% · 32% of their budget
  • CH
    COREWELL HEALTH
    5× · 2020–2024 · $2.7M · revenue +86%
  • HN
    Health Net of West Michigan
    7× · 2017–2024 · $2.6M · revenue +90% · 26% of their budget

Funded once

  • TY
    The Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Grand Rapids (3019)
    one grant, 2024 · $152k · revenue +21%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Michigan Family Resources

Michigan Family Resources mission is to deliver holistic family-centered services to children that promote their well-being and development.

Education
2
Center for Family Health

The mission of the Center for Family Health is opening the door to health care for all.

Health
3
Midmichigan Health Services

To provide high quality community-oriented, patient-centered health services for all.

Health
4
Family Outreach Center

Leading the way in promoting healthy family living by reaching out to underserved populations and those who are in our community.

5
Child Care Resource and Referral of Kalamazoo

To work with parents, child care providers, businesses and the community to improve access to quality child care and early education so that every child enjoys safe, nurturing and inspiring care.

Human Services
6
Lincoln Behavioral Services

To provide comprehensive outpatient mental health services to over 5400 individuals and their families in a consumer driven person centered delivery system. Approximately 15% of our staff members are our clients who are involved in a…

Health
7
Michigan Child Care Centers Inc

Touching hearts, teaching minds, changing lives

8
Catholic Social Services of Washtenaw County

Catholic Social Services of Washtenaw County D/B/A Catholic Charities Washtenaw County provides diverse, holistic social services including adoption and pregnancy counseling, food and basic needs assistance, domestic and child abuse…

9
Brilliant Detroit

Helping families and neighborhoods succeed by providing a place and support to assure kids ages 0-5 are school ready and families are healthy and stable.

Youth Development
10
Child and Family Services of the Upper Peninsula Inc

To strengthen, nuture and empower children and families for a brighter future by providing programs that preserve the dignity and enhance the well-being of families throughout michigan's upper peninsula, in a caring, compassionate and…

Human Services
11
Michigan's Children

To ensure that policymakers prioritize the needs of the most challenged children from cradle to career.

Human Services
12
Mgh Family Health Center Muskegon Family Care

Muskegon family care is a federally qualified health center with medical and dental clinics reaching out to uninsured and underinsured patients in muskegon county.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Vibrant Futures and the most unlike its peers is The Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Grand Rapids (3019). Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
15/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

KENT INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL DISTRICT — $2,718,273 · OtherKENT INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL DISTRICTKENT COUNTY — $2,382,550 · OtherKENT COUNTYGRAND RAPIDS COMMUNITY COLLEGE — $1,572,531 · OtherGRAND RAPIDS COMMUNITY COLLEGEEarly Learning Neighborhood Collaborative — $461,953 · OtherEarly Learning Neighborhood Colla…Basis Policy Research LLC — $328,500 · Other+3 more — $391,029 · OtherCOREWELL HEALTH — $2,663,672 · HealthCOREWELL HEALTHHealth Net of West Michigan — $2,632,919 · HealthHealth Net of West MichiganCherry Street Services Inc — $1,246,623 · HealthCherry Street Services Inc+1 more — $159,546 · HealthTHE ARBOR CIRCLE CORPORATION — $1,791,305 · Human ServicesTHE ARBOR CIRCLE CO…VIBRANT FUTURES — $1,034,509 · Human ServicesVIBRANT FUTURESBETHANY CHRISTIAN SERVICES — $601,183 · Human ServicesBETHANY CHRISTIAN S…WEST MICHIGAN PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN — $378,839 · Human ServicesWEST MICHIGAN PARTN…EASTERSEALS MORC HEALTH CARE INC — $363,226 · Human ServicesEASTERSEALS MORC HE…HISPANIC CENTER OF WESTERN MICHIGAN INC — $304,475 · Human ServicesHISPANIC CENTER OF …+1 more — $152,156 · Human ServicesFAMILY FUTURES — $3,958,462 · Crime & LegalFAMILY FUTURESHEALTHY HOMES COALITION OF WEST MICHIGAN INC — $913,198 · Housing & ShelterFAMILY PROMISE OF GRAND RAPIDS — $783,255 · Housing & ShelterREADY FOR SCHOOL — $977,179 · EducationMOMSBLOOM INC — $587,862 · Civil RightsHEART OF WEST MICHIGAN UNITED WAY — $89,788 · Philanthropy
Other$7,854,836Health$6,702,760Human Services$4,625,693Crime & Legal$3,958,462Housing & Shelter$1,696,453Education$977,179Civil Rights$587,862Philanthropy$89,788

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFAMILY FUTURES — $3,958,462 over 5y, 32% of budgetCOREWELL HEALTH — $2,663,672 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHealth Net of West Michigan — $2,632,919 over 7y, 26% of budgetTHE ARBOR CIRCLE CORPORATION — $1,791,305 over 5y, 4.0% of budgetCherry Street Services Inc — $1,246,623 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetVIBRANT FUTURES — $1,034,509 over 5y, 7.4% of budgetREADY FOR SCHOOL — $977,179 over 5y, 30% of budgetHEALTHY HOMES COALITION OF WEST MICHIGAN INC — $913,198 over 5y, 61% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF GRAND RAPIDS — $783,255 over 5y, 6.8% of budgetBETHANY CHRISTIAN SERVICES — $601,183 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetMOMSBLOOM INC — $587,862 over 5y, 54% of budgetEarly Learning Neighborhood Collaborative — $461,953 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetWEST MICHIGAN PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN — $378,839 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetEASTERSEALS MORC HEALTH CARE INC — $363,226 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetHISPANIC CENTER OF WESTERN MICHIGAN INC — $304,475 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetDA BLODGETT - ST JOHN'S — $242,518 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetCOMPREHENSIVE THERAPY CENTER — $159,546 over 5y, 5.6% of budgetThe Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Grand Rapids (3019) — $152,156 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHEART OF WEST MICHIGAN UNITED WAY — $89,788 over 2y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FAMILY FUTURES
  • Who funds COREWELL HEALTH
  • Who funds Health Net of West Michigan
  • Who funds THE ARBOR CIRCLE CORPORATION
  • Who funds Cherry Street Services Inc
  • Who funds VIBRANT FUTURES
  • Who funds READY FOR SCHOOL
  • Who funds HEALTHY HOMES COALITION OF WEST MICHIGAN INC
  • Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF GRAND RAPIDS
  • Who funds BETHANY CHRISTIAN SERVICES
  • Who funds MOMSBLOOM INC
  • Who funds Early Learning Neighborhood Collaborative
  • Who funds WEST MICHIGAN PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN
  • Who funds EASTERSEALS MORC HEALTH CARE INC
  • Who funds HISPANIC CENTER OF WESTERN MICHIGAN INC
  • Who funds DA BLODGETT - ST JOHN'S
  • Who funds COMPREHENSIVE THERAPY CENTER
  • Who funds The Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Grand Rapids (3019)
  • Who funds HEART OF WEST MICHIGAN UNITED WAY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Grand Rapids Community FoundationMI41.9× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Grand Rapids Community Foundation · Corewell Health Group Return · Michigan Health Endowment Fund · Heart of West Michigan United Way · Frey Foundation · The Wege Foundation · The Community Foundation of the Holland/Zeeland Area Inc · WK Kellogg Foundation · The Sebastian Foundation · Douglas & Maria Devos Foundation · Feeding America West Michigan · Health Net of West Michigan

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization First Steps Kent funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph