Skip to content

· Private foundation

First Push Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$15k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SKATE LIKE A GIRL$3,000
COWTOWN SKATE$2,000
INTERNATIONAL SKATEBOARDING HALL OF FAME$1,480
THE TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PARTNERSHIP OF ARIZONA$1,000
SKATE WILD FOUNDATION$1,000
FRIENDS OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY PARKS$1,000
LAUNCH COMMUNITY THROUGH SKATEBOARDING$1,000
BOARDS FOR BROS$1,000
MAKE LIFE SKATE LIFE$1,000
SKATEISTAN$1,000
FRESNO SKATEBOARD SALVAGE$1,000
THE SKATEPARK PROJECT$1,000
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY24–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 68% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%COWTOWN SKATE: $2k → 11%INTERNATIONAL SKATEBOARDING HALL OF FAME: $1k → 10%SKATE WILD FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%THE SKATEPARK PROJECT: $1k → 11%FRIENDS OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY PARKS: $1k → 13%FRESNO SKATEBOARD SALVAGE: $1k → 19%BOARDS FOR BROS: $1k → 13%MAKE LIFE SKATE LIFE: $1k → 7%LAUNCH COMMUNITY THROUGH SKATEBOARDING: $1k → 11%SKATEISTAN: $1k → 9%THE TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PARTNERSHIP OF ARIZONA: $1k → 11%SKATE LIKE A GIRL: $3k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Skate Free Inc
Education
2
Black Girls Skate

Our mission is to increase the visibility of skaters and promote safety practices, while also creating positive and safe spaces for individuals new to skating, those aspiring to improve, and professional skaters. We are committed to…

Recreation & Sports
3
Super Skate Posse

To make the mental health and wellness benefits of skateboarding available to children in underserved communities by providing free skateboards helmets, shoes, and lessons

Recreation & Sports
4
Lebanon Skatepark Committee

To enrich the city of lebanon by cooperating with local skaters, businesses, and community at large to facilitate the construction of a public skatepark.

Recreation & Sports
5
The Younglo Skate Project Inc

our mission statement is helping underserved kids be part of an empowering, supportive and exciting culture one skateboard at a time.

Public Benefit
6
Association of Skateboarders in Hawaii
Recreation & Sports
7
Skate Bud Program Inc
Education
8
Girls On Shred

Our mission is to empower youth and marginalized genders including women non-binary, and trans folk, and build community through action sports skill-building, equipment sharing, and accessible community events. We seek to transform…

Youth Development
9
Board House Society

Providing outdoor education through skateboarding camps and lessons to local youth

Human Services
10
Gwl Skatepark Corp

Gwl skatepark mission is to raise funds to build a skatepark accessible to the underprivilege youth and to develop appreciation for this sport in this unique community.

Philanthropy
11
Skate Raleigh

Advocacy, fundraising, and activation for action sports in Raleigh, North Carolina.

Recreation & Sports
12
Humboldt Skatepark Collective

The mission of the Humboldt Skatepark Collective is to enhance the health and quality of life for community members by providing recreational opportunities in Humboldt County. Through advocacy and outreach, we aim to support programs and…

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cowtown Skate; the most unlike its peers is Technical Assistance Partnership of Arizona. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
1/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SKATE LIKE A GIRL: $3,000 · Recreation & SportsSKATE LIKE A GIRLCOWTOWN SKATE: $2,000 · Recreation & SportsCOWTOWN SKATESKATE WILD FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Recreation & SportsSKATE WILD FOUNDATIONFRESNO SKATEBOARD SALVAGE INC: $1,000 · Recreation & SportsFRESNO SKATEBOARD SALVAGE INCBOARDS FOR BROS INC: $1,000 · Recreation & SportsBOARDS FOR BROS INCLaunch Community Through Skateboard: $1,000 · Recreation & SportsLaunch Community Through SkateboardINTERNATIONAL SKATEBOARDING HALL OF FAME: $1,480 · OtherINTERNATIONAL SKAT…FRIENDS OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY PARKS: $1,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF SANTA C…MAKE LIFE SKATE LIFE: $1,000 · InternationalMAKE LIFE SKAT…SKATEISTAN: $1,000 · InternationalSKATEISTANTHE SKATEPARK PROJECT: $1,000 · PhilanthropyTECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PARTNERSHIP OF ARIZONA: $1,000 · Health
Recreation & Sports$9,000Other$2,480International$2,000Philanthropy$1,000Health$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSKATE LIKE A GIRL: $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOWTOWN SKATE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE SKATEPARK PROJECT: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE LIFE SKATE LIFE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY PARKS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSKATE WILD FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetSKATEISTAN: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFRESNO SKATEBOARD SALVAGE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetBOARDS FOR BROS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetTECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PARTNERSHIP OF ARIZONA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLaunch Community Through Skateboard: $1,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Paypal Charitable Giving FundDC7.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization First Push Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from First Push Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to First Push Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to First Push Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on First Push’s filings →

    More from the funding graph