Skip to content
First Nonprofit Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

First Nonprofit Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$5.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
135
Grants FY2024still arriving
—
States reached
$111k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$6.5MHealth$1.5MHuman Services$952kEducation$917kRecreation & Sports$727kPhilanthropy$324kInternational$320kHousing & Shelter$304kOther$0
02FY2024 · 135 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 135 grants below total $3,166,299, the rows itemized in this filing. The $5,524,074 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $2,357,775 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k60 grants · $232k
  • $10k–50k54 grants · $1.1M
  • $50k–250k21 grants · $1.8M
$10,000
Median grant
—
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Yeshiva Lubavitch of Baltimore$111,111
Ohr Eliyahu Lubavitch Mesivta of Chicago$111,111
Yeshiva and Mesivta Menachem$111,111
Yeshiva Lubavitch of Baltimore$111,111
Yeshivas Ohr Eliyahu Lubavitch Mesivta of$111,111
Yeshiva and Mesivta Menachem$111,111
Yeshiva Lubavitch of Baltimore$111,111
Ohr Eliyahu Lubavitch Mesivta of Chicago$111,111
Yeshiva and Mesivta Menachem$111,111
Tzur Foundation$100,000
Tzur Foundation$100,000
Kollel Bais Boruch Sanz Grybov$100,000
AF of - Rabbinical College of Telz Stone$100,000
Kollel of Boro Park$100,000
BMA American Israel Relief Foundation$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $743k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 68% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PALS PROGRAMS: $5k → 6%NEW LEASH ON LIFE USA: $39k → 7%NEW HOPE MINISTRIES: $30k → 9%SOUTH BAY COMMUNITY SERVICES: $5k → 11%FAMILY YMCA OF THE DESERT: $10k → 11%DREAM CENTER FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%OLMSTED CENTER FOR SIGHT: $20k → 13%HERITAGE CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $10k → 14%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON: $5k → 14%OPERATION HEALING FORCES: $50k → 12%ASPIRE OF ILLINOIS: $30k → 14%LIFE TOWN: $10k → 16%SPIRIT OPEN EQUESTRIAN PROGRAM: $50k → 6%QUEST THERAPEUTIC SERVICES INC: $25k → 6%WOODS SERVICES INC: $25k → 6%DESERT ABILITY CENTER: $10k → 11%OPERATION HEALING FORCES: $25k → 12%KIDS IN DISTRESS INC: $15k → 13%SPIRIT OPEN EQUESTRIAN PROGRAM: $25k → 6%DESERT ABILITY CENTER: $10k → 11%MEMORY MATTERS: $25k → 10%AARON'S ACRES: $7k → 9%DESERT ABILITY CENTER: $5k → 11%FLORENCE FULLER CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $15k → 11%MEMORY MATTERS: $11k → 10%CONCORDIA PLACE: $20k → 14%UCAN: $10k → 14%CONCORDIA PLACE: $10k → 14%SOMEONE TO TELL IT TO: $10k → 12%Kimpatorin Aid: $25k → 20%THE WOMEN'S TREATMENT CENTER: $15k → 14%JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER HARRISBURG: $31k → 12%ASSOCIATION HOUSE OF CHICAGO (AHC): $17k → 14%THE CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE: $59k → 14%THE CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE: $25k → 14%COMMUNITY ACTION COMMISSION: $25k → 12%COMMUNITY ACTION COMMISSION: $25k → 12%HEALTHY STEPS DIAPER BANK: $4k → 12%HEALTHY STEPS DIAPER BANK: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
ID
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
LA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 20% of First Nonprofit Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

First Nonprofit Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.1% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$9.6M · 60 repeat orgs$4.9M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +48% since the first grant, against +47% for those funded once.

60 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2024, 39 since wound down; 71 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

60
170

Total granted

$9.6M
$3.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+47%

Still filing today

42%
51%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.3M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationCrime & LegalRecreation & SportsArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TD
    TORAH DAY SCHOOL OF DALLAS
    3× · 2017–2020 · $303k · revenue +39%
  • TA
    THE ALEPH INSTITUTE INC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $300k · revenue +29%
  • NS
    NORTH SHORE HEBREW ACADEMY
    2× · 2017–2021 · $150k · revenue +71%

Funded once

  • OE
    Ohr Eliyahu Lubavitch Mesivta of Ch
    one grant, 2021 · $333k
  • MM
    MAIMONIDES MEDICAL CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $250k · revenue +36%
  • CC
    COLEL CHABAD
    one grant, 2019 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Marrakech Inc

Provides person-centered and inclusive services to children and adults with and without disabilities that includes securing employment, connecting to necessary supportive services, accessing housing and participating fully as contributing…

Employment
2
Job Options Inc

To actively seek employment for individuals with psychological or physical disabilities.

Employment
3
The Way Back Inc

To provide rehabilitative housing services and support to help people with psychiatric disabilities reintegrate into the community.the agency provides rehabilitative housing services and staff support as a primary mechanism for achieving…

Human Services
4
Lifeworks Incorporated

Lifeworks provides education, jobs and homes for persons with developmental disabilities empowering them to lead meaningful lives within the community. our guiding principles ensure that lifeworks staff and volunteers strive to create and…

Human Services
5
Abilitypath

Empower people with special needs to achieve their full potential through innovative, inclusive programs and community partnerships.

Employment
6
Via Rehabilitation Services Inc

Our mission is to empower people with disabilities and their families to grow, develop, and thrive by providing essential skill-building, therapeutic, and recreational programs.

Health
7
Lifestream Inc

Lifestream, inc. (the organization") provides community-based services that support individuals in attaining greater independence, promising opportunities, and lives that are meaningful and fulfilling on their own terms.

Health
8
Homeward Bound Inc

Providing innovative and life-enriching services for children, adolescents, and adults with disabilities.

Human Services
9
Connections for Life

Empowering people with disabilities by providing services that promote independence, equality and intergration, enhancing their quality of life.

Health
10
Developmental Services Center of Champaign County Inc

Developmental services center (dsc) supports people with disabilities in living a rich and meaningful life.

Human Services
11
Goodwill Industries of Greater New York & Northern New Jersey Inc

Goodwill nynj empowers people with disabilities and other barriers to employment to gain independence through the power of work. goodwill nynj provided services to more than 11,087 adults in fiscal year 2025 through all programs.

Employment
12
Lifeworks Services Inc

Lifeworks' mission is to partner with people with disabilities to drive change by increasing opportunity and access in the community.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Welllife Network Inc; the most unlike its peers is Philadelphia Boys Gymnastics. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

119 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 119 of the 304 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
36
Early backer (in before they grew)
115/119
Grantees still filing
90/119
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OHR ELIYAHU LUBAVITCH MESIVTA OF CHICAGO: $1,144,443 · OtherOHR ELIYAHU LUBAVITCH MESIVTA OF CHICAGOYESHIVAS LUBAVITCH OF BALTIMORE INC: $1,033,332 · OtherYESHIVAS LUBAVITCH OF BALTIMORE INCYeshiva and Mesivta Menachem: $999,999 · OtherYeshiva and Mesivta MenachemYESHIVA MESIVTA MENACHEM: $699,999 · OtherYESHIVA MESIVTA MENACHEMYeshiva Lubavitch of Baltimore: $666,666 · OtherYeshiva Lubavitch of BaltimoreKollel of Boro Park: $500,000 · OtherKollel Bais Boruch Sanz Grybov: $450,000 · Other+141 more: $6,235,721 · Other+141 moreTHE CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR VISUALLY IMPAIRED: $84,000 · Human ServicesSPIRIT OPEN EQUESTRIAN PROGRAM INC: $75,000 · Human ServicesOPERATION HEALING FORCES INC: $75,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ACTION COMMISSION: $50,000 · Human ServicesNEW LEASH ON LIFE USA: $38,500 · Human ServicesMEMORY MATTERS: $35,500 · Human ServicesJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER HARRISBURG: $30,655 · Human ServicesNEW HOPE MINISTRIES INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesASPIRE OF ILLINOIS: $30,000 · Human ServicesCONCORDIA PLACE: $30,000 · Human ServicesWoods Services Inc: $25,000 · Human ServicesKIMPATORIN AID INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesQUEST THERAPEUTIC SERVICES INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesDesert Ability Center: $25,000 · Human Services+11 more: $142,520 · Human ServicesMAIMONIDES MEDICAL CENTER: $250,000 · HealthAMUDIM COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC: $100,000 · HealthKAPAYIM INC: $72,000 · HealthCLINICS CAN HELP INC: $30,460 · HealthBLUFFTON-JASPER COUNTY VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE INC: $22,500 · HealthUNITED DISABILITIES SERVICES FOUNDATION: $18,450 · Health+4 more: $55,077 · HealthTORAH DAY SCHOOL OF DALLAS: $303,000 · EducationTHE AUDITORY ORAL SCHOOL OF NY: $50,000 · EducationREACH OUT AND READ INC: $35,000 · EducationPHOENIX ALTERNATIVES INC: $30,000 · EducationRAR-MA INC: $20,000 · Education+2 more: $25,000 · EducationTHE ALEPH INSTITUTE INC: $300,000 · Crime & LegalThe Chicago Area Project: $25,700 · Crime & LegalPENNSYLVANIANS FOR MODERN COURTS: $20,871 · Crime & LegalFRESH START HEALING HEART: $15,000 · Crime & LegalMORASHA OLAMI INC: $100,000 · InternationalAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SHAARE ZEDEK HOSPITAL IN JERUSALEM INC: $100,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC: $100,000 · InternationalFLEUR DE QUE: $100,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF COLLIER AND THE KEYS INC: $41,540 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL PA: $19,500 · Philanthropy
Other$11,730,160Human Services$721,175Health$548,487Education$463,000Crime & Legal$361,571International$300,000Philanthropy$161,040

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE ALEPH INSTITUTE INC: $300,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetMAIMONIDES MEDICAL CENTER: $250,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH SHORE HEBREW ACADEMY: $150,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetMORASHA OLAMI INC: $100,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAMUDIM COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC: $100,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SHAARE ZEDEK HOSPITAL IN JERUSALEM INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR VISUALLY IMPAIRED: $84,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSPIRIT OPEN EQUESTRIAN PROGRAM INC: $75,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetOPERATION HEALING FORCES INC: $75,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetMOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC: $72,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetKAPAYIM INC: $72,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetWHITAKER CENTER FOR SCIENCE AND THE ARTS: $60,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE LOWCOUNTRY INC: $55,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION COMMISSION: $50,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetTHE AUDITORY ORAL SCHOOL OF NY: $50,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetKIDS-N-CAMP FUND INC: $50,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetNEWVIEW OKLAHOMA INC: $45,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF COLLIER AND THE KEYS INC: $41,540 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetWESTMORELAND SANCTUARY INC: $40,000 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetMUSLIMS FOR PROGRESSIVE VALUES: $40,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetKids Above All Illinois: $39,398 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNEW LEASH ON LIFE USA: $38,500 over 1y, 6.9% of budgetMEMORY MATTERS: $35,500 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetREACH OUT AND READ INC: $35,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER HARRISBURG: $30,655 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCLINICS CAN HELP INC: $30,460 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetMIRASOL HEALTH INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetNEW HOPE MINISTRIES INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetASPIRE OF ILLINOIS: $30,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetOSPREY VILLAGE INC: $30,000 over 1y, 7.6% of budgetTHE COMMON WHEEL: $30,000 over 1y, 9.6% of budgetPHOENIX ALTERNATIVES INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCONCORDIA PLACE: $30,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetVISIONS FOR CREATIVE HOUSING SOLUTIONS: $28,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetThe Chicago Area Project: $25,700 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetHERITAGE FOR THE BLIND INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetWoods Services Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S GOLF FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetKIMPATORIN AID INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetOUR HOUSE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetNational Veterans Homeless Support Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetQUEST THERAPEUTIC SERVICES INC: $25,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetDesert Ability Center: $25,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetLUTHERAN CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES OF ILLINOIS: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBLUFFTON-JASPER COUNTY VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE INC: $22,500 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetSHALOM HOUSE: $21,345 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetVIA VISUALLY IMPAIRED ADVANCEMENT: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TORAH DAY SCHOOL OF DALLAS ↗
  • Who funds THE ALEPH INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds MAIMONIDES MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NORTH SHORE HEBREW ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds MORASHA OLAMI INC ↗
  • Who funds AMUDIM COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SHAARE ZEDEK HOSPITAL IN JERUSALEM INC ↗
  • Who funds FLEUR DE QUE ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR VISUALLY IMPAIRED ↗
  • Who funds SPIRIT OPEN EQUESTRIAN PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION HEALING FORCES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Foundation for En…Schwab-Silfen Foundat…Lancaster County Comm…United Way of the Cap…Community Foundation …Pryor E & Arlene R Ne…The Donald B and Doro…United Way of Metropo…Rite Aid Healthy Futu…Trustmark FoundationFerree FoundationMcCormick Family Fdn …
The Foundation for Enhancing CommunitiesPA27.1× affinity12 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Foundation for Enhancing Communities · Schwab-Silfen Foundation · Lancaster County Community Foundation · United Way of the Capital Region · Community Foundation of the Lowcountry · Pryor E & Arlene R Neuber Charitable Trust · The Donald B and Dorothy L Stabler Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · Rite Aid Healthy Futures · Trustmark Foundation · Ferree Foundation · McCormick Family Fdn Agent 80397

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization First Nonprofit Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from First Nonprofit Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Clifford Beers Community Care Center Inc: 75% of income from government
  • Newview Oklahoma Inc: 45% of income from government
  • Nantucket Maria Mitchell Association in: 9% of income from government
  • Reach Out and Read Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Children's Golf Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Kids in Distress Inc: 0% of income from government
  • The Aleph Institute Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
32report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to First Nonprofit Foundation?

Find your warmest path to First Nonprofit Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 304 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $6.2M of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on First Nonprofit’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home