Skip to content

· Private foundation

Fire Horse Refuge Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$45k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k21 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$675
Median grant
11
States reached
$25k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NIRVANA MUSTANG SANCTUARY$15,405
HEART OF THE WILD EQUINE RESCUE NSC$9,465
Individual grant recipient$7,406
Individual grant recipient$1,672
Individual grant recipient$1,530
DIAMOND BAR RANCH INC$1,280
HABITAT FOR HORSES$1,213
Individual grant recipient$1,126
Individual grant recipient$910
SWEET GRASS ADVOCACY FOR NORTH AMER$908
SWEET BAY EQUINE RESCUE OF POPLARVI$675
COLORADO GIVES FOUNDATION$624
THE RED HORSE RUNNING EQUINE FOUNDA$538
Individual grant recipient$400
CHRYSTAL MCHENRY RUSTIC C RANCH$342
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY24–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 88% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FOR LOVE OF HOOF: $351 → 14%JUDY WILKINSON COLLINS: $220 → 7%SINKYONE ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $400 → 9%EARTHJUSTICE: $260 → 10%JILL ROBERTSON FUOCO: $2k → 12%ALL SEATS IN A BARN: $500 → 18%TRI RIDGE RANCH: $500 → 14%HABITAT FOR HORSES: $1k → 10%PAW 4 THE FOUNDATION: $103 → 11%EVANESCENT MUSTANG RESCUE AND SANCT: $299 → 11%TONYA GULLEY: $850 → 14%CHRYSTAL MCHENRY RUSTIC C RANCH: $342 → 17%NIRVANA MUSTANG SANCTUARY: $18k → 17%DIAMOND BAR RANCH INC: $1k → 16%LAPOINT LONGHORN RANCH: $100 → 9%STONE VALLEYS RAY OF HOPE EQUINE RE: $125 → 9%ERICA BLEVINS: $200 → 10%ANNE GARRITY: $1k → 15%HEATHER QUINN: $6k → 19%ALAYNA BLACK: $100 → 19%ANDREA LARKIN: $910 → 13%HORSE PLUS HUMANE SOCIETY: $200 → 14%HEART OF THE WILD EQUINE RESCUE NSC: $9k → 21%COLORADO GIVES FOUNDATION: $624 → 7%FRIENDS OF LACKOTA: $7k → 9%SWEET GRASS ADVOCACY FOR NORTH AMER: $3k → 10%SWEET BAY EQUINE RESCUE OF POPLARVI: $675 → 18%JILL ROBERTSON FUOCO: $1k → 12%HABITAT FOR HORSES: $800 → 10%TONYA GULLEY HOOFPRINTS TRAIL: $250 → 14%NIRVANA MUSTANG SANCTUARY: $15k → 17%DIAMOND BAR RANCH INC: $613 → 16%ANNE GARRITY: $848 → 15%HEATHER QUINN: $2k → 19%NICOLE SCHOLL: $4k → 21%COLORADO GIVES FOUNDATION: $52 → 7%FRIENDS OF LACKOTA: $1k → 9%SWEET GRASS ADVOCACY FOR NORTH AMER: $908 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
CA
CO
AZ
TN
NC
OK
AL
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$61k · 8 repeat orgs$21k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
8

Total granted

$61k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
0%

Still filing today

38%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’24’25
AnimalsEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NM
    NIRVANA MUSTANG SANCTUARY
    2× · 2024–2025 · $33k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2024–2025 · $8k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2024–2025 · $7k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $4k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $850
  • AS
    ALL SEATED IN A BARN
    one grant, 2024 · $500 · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Platte Ranch Forever Home Sanctuary
Animals
2
New Hope Farm Inc

Rescue and sanctuary for horses, donkeys, and mules.

—
3
2nd Chance Ranch and Rescue

Sanctuary for abused or abandoned animals

Animals
4
Tuckers Place Equine Sanctuary

501c3 horse rescue

Animals
5
Thunder Mountain Farms Equine Rescue

Rescue horses from slaughter and neglect and find homes for them.

Animals
6
Hope 4 Horses Rescue and Sanctuary

Rescue, Rehabilitate, train and try to adopt horses out that are healthy to permanent homes. We bring in horses that are seized by the counties within our state of Illinois, we take in owner surrenders when folks cannnot care and feed for…

Animals
7
For the Love of the Hoof Inc

Animal rescue, we rescue equines from the slaughter pipeline and rehibilitation

Animals
8
Hooves of My Heart Equine Rescue Ltd
Animals
9
Rainfall Ranch Rescue

Equine rescue and rehabilitation

Animals
10
Miracle Horse Rescue Inc

rescue abused neglected equines of all types of condition we provide all care and a final home for them to live out remainder of days as opposed to going to slaughter

Animals
11
Focus Rescue & Rehabilitation Co

Prevention of animal abuse and neglect in the United States. In our fourth year of operation, we were able to save over numerous horses, sheep, pigs, donkeys, mules, cows, chickens, dogs, cats and birds. This was accomplished though our…

Animals
12
Healing Hearts Hooves and Paws Rescue

rescue rehab retraining and rehoming for homeless and neglected equine and canine

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Horse Plus Humane Society; the most unlike its peers is Earthjustice. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
0/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NIRVANA MUSTANG SANCTUARY: $33,482 · OtherNIRVANA MUSTANG SANCTUARYHEART OF THE WILD EQUINE RESCUE NSC: $9,465 · OtherHEART OF THE WILD EQUINE RESCUE NSCIndividual grant recipient: $8,406 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $7,153 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $4,447 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSWEET GRASS ADVOCACY FOR NORTH AMER: $3,729 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $2,845 · Other+16 more: $7,834 · Other+16 moreHABITAT FOR HORSES INC: $2,013 · AnimalsDIAMOND BAR RANCH INC: $1,893 · AnimalsALL SEATED IN A BARN: $500 · AnimalsHORSE PLUS HUMANE SOCIETY: $200 · Animals+1 more: $103 · AnimalsCOLORADO GIVES FOUNDATION: $676 · PhilanthropyEARTHJUSTICE: $260 · Environment
Other$77,361Animals$4,709Philanthropy$676Environment$260

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNIRVANA MUSTANG SANCTUARY: $33,482 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetHABITAT FOR HORSES INC: $2,013 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDIAMOND BAR RANCH INC: $1,893 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetCOLORADO GIVES FOUNDATION: $676 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALL SEATED IN A BARN: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE: $260 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHORSE PLUS HUMANE SOCIETY: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAW 4 THE FOUNDATION INC: $103 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NIRVANA MUSTANG SANCTUARY ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HORSES INC ↗
  • Who funds DIAMOND BAR RANCH INC ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO GIVES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALL SEATED IN A BARN ↗
  • Who funds EARTHJUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds HORSE PLUS HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds PAW 4 THE FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fire Horse Refuge Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fire Horse Refuge Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Fire Horse Refuge Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Fire Horse Refuge Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Fire Horse Refuge’s filings →

    More from the funding graph