Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ferguson Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$828k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$645kArts & Culture$545kEducation$500kHealth$303kReligion$233kHuman Services$75kPhilanthropy$50kEnvironment$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $268k
  • $250k+2 grants · $550k
$118,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$615k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Roundup River Ranch$300,000
Mayo Clinic$250,000
Vail Religious Foundation$118,000
Bravo Vail$100,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
Vail Jazz Foundation$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 37% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Mayo Clinic: $250k → 9%Planned Parenthood: $10k → 17%ACTIVE MINDS: $500 → 14%Chris Long Foundation: $1k → 11%Bright Future: $500 → 8%ROUNDUP RIVER RANCH: $120k → 7%Roundup River Ranch: $300k → 8%Planned Parenthood of the Rocky Mtns: $13k → 12%CureSearch for Children's Cancer: $20k → 8%Loyola University Maryland: $335k → 19%Vail Valley Foundation: $10k → 7%Roundup River Ranch: $200k → 8%Planned Parenthood of the Rocky Mtns: $10k → 12%Loyola Univeristy Maryland: $85k → 19%WALKING MOUNTAINS SCIENCE CENTER: $10k → 7%Roundup River Ranch: $25k → 8%Loyola Univeristy Maryland: $80k → 19%Vail Religious Foundation: $118k → 7%Vail Interfaith Chapel: $115k → 7%Bravo Vail: $100k → 7%Bravo Vail: $75k → 7%Bravo Vail: $75k → 7%Bravo Vail: $75k → 7%Bravo Vail: $30k → 7%Bravo Vail: $30k → 7%Bravo Vail: $25k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
UT
CO
MO
VA
MD
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 6 repeat orgs$177k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
8

Total granted

$1.9M
$127k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+45%

Still filing today

67%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthRecreation & SportsEducationArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RR
    ROUNDUP RIVER RANCH
    4× · 2017–2025 · $645k · revenue +73%
  • LU
    Loyola University Maryland Inc
    3× · 2020–2023 · $500k · revenue +28%
  • BV
    Bravo Vail
    7× · 2019–2025 · $410k

Funded once

  • EV
    Eagle Valley Community Center
    one grant, 2023 · $75k
  • CF
    CURESEARCH FOR CHILDREN'S CANCER
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue -19%
  • WM
    WALKING MOUNTAINSgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +45%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Virginia Investment Management Company

The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

Education
2
Vail Health Services

Vail health services is the parent company of a group of companies generally known as vail health, whose mission is to elevate health across our mountain communities.

Health
3
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
4
Vail International Pro Am
Recreation & Sports
5
The Vermont Community Foundation

The vermont community foundation helps to build philanthropic resources to sustain healthy and vital vermont communities. the foundation connects and mobilizes people through giving to multiply the impact of philanthropy.

Philanthropy
6
Eagle River Valley Childcare

Eagle river valley childcare is strategically designed to address the childcare supply and affordability issues in the eagle county, colorado community.

Human Services
7
Eagle Valley Mental Health

Eagle valley mental health (dba eagle valley behavioral health) primarily serves the behavioral health care needs of eagle county, and secondarily the region surrounding eagle county.

Health
8
Uvmc Foundation

Enhance the patient and family experience at upper valley medical center by raising community support for programs and services which help build healthy communities.

Philanthropy
9
Vitalant

Unite blood and biologics donors, talent, and innovation to save and improve lives.

Health
10
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

—
11
Colorado Gives Foundation

We connect people, ideas, and nonprofits to make good happen. our vision is that all of jeffco is thriving.

Philanthropy
12
Poudre Valley Medical Group Llc

We improve lives. in big ways through learning, healing and discovery. in small, personal ways through human connection. but in all ways, we improve lives.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Roundup River Ranch; the most unlike its peers is Eagle Valley Community Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Loyola University Maryland Inc: $500,000 · OtherLoyola University Maryland IncBravo Vail: $410,000 · OtherBravo VailVAIL RELIGIOUS FOUNDATION: $233,000 · OtherVAIL RELIGIOUS FOUNDATIONEagle Valley Community Center: $75,000 · OtherEagle Valley Community CenterIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · Other+4 more: $43,000 · OtherROUNDUP RIVER RANCH: $645,150 · Recreation & SportsROUNDUP RIVER RANCHMAYO CLINIC: $250,000 · HealthMAYO CLINICCURESEARCH FOR CHILDREN'S CANCER: $20,000 · HealthCURESEARCH F…+1 more: $500 · HealthTHE VAIL JAZZ FOUNDATION INC: $135,000 · Arts & CultureEAGLE VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $1,000 · PhilanthropyWALKING MOUNTAINS: $10,000 · EducationVAIL VALLEY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Community Improvement
Other$1,311,000Recreation & Sports$645,150Health$270,500Arts & Culture$135,000Philanthropy$51,000Education$10,000Community Improvement$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetROUNDUP RIVER RANCH: $645,150 over 4y, 4.5% of budgetLoyola University Maryland Inc: $500,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetVAIL RELIGIOUS FOUNDATION: $233,000 over 2y, 23% of budgetTHE VAIL JAZZ FOUNDATION INC: $135,000 over 6y, 18% of budgetEAGLE VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetCURESEARCH FOR CHILDREN'S CANCER: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetVAIL VALLEY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHRIS LONG FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetActive Minds Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ROUNDUP RIVER RANCH ↗
  • Who funds Loyola University Maryland Inc ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds VAIL RELIGIOUS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE VAIL JAZZ FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds EAGLE VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CURESEARCH FOR CHILDREN'S CANCER ↗
  • Who funds WALKING MOUNTAINS ↗
  • Who funds VAIL VALLEY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHRIS LONG FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Active Minds Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA10.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ferguson Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ferguson Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • Loyola University Maryland Inc: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Ferguson Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Ferguson Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ferguson Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph