Skip to content

· Private foundation

Female Samaritan Association

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$13k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$46kFood & Nutrition$12kReligion$7kHealth$6kRecreation & Sports$6kYouth Development$4kArts & Culture$3kEducation$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$350
Median grant
1
States reached
$332k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Opportunity Alliance$4,800
Salvation Army$1,550
Individual grant recipient$800
Root Cellar$650
Through These Doors$650
Wayside Soup Kitchen$500
Project Feed$500
Wayside Soup Kitchen$500
Abba$450
Cultivating Community$350
St Vincent de Paul$300
Simple Gifts$300
Learning Works$300
Stevens Ave Congregational Church$300
Grace Street Ministry$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $26k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%Opportunity Alliance: $5k → 7%Opportunity Alliance: $5k → 7%Opportunity Alliance: $4k → 7%Opportunity Alliance: $2k → 7%Opportunity Alliance: $2k → 7%Opportunity Alliance: $2k → 7%Through These Doors: $650 → 7%Through These Doors: $650 → 7%Opportunity Alliance: $600 → 7%Through These Doors: $500 → 7%Opportunity Alliance: $500 → 7%Leaning Works: $500 → 7%Through These Doors: $500 → 7%Leaning Works: $500 → 7%Opportunity Alliance: $500 → 7%Learning Works: $300 → 7%Through These Doors: $250 → 7%Learning Works: $150 → 7%Simple Gifts: $500 → 7%Simple Gifts: $500 → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$89k · 23 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
14

Total granted

$89k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+47%

Still filing today

43%
7%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionHealthArts & CultureEducationYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TO
    The Opportunity Alliance
    9× · 2017–2025 · $21k · revenue +53%
  • WF
    Wayside Food Programs
    8× · 2018–2025 · $7k · revenue +56%
  • SG
    SIMPLE GIFTS
    7× · 2018–2025 · $3k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • PF
    Portland Family Shelter
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • SA
    Salvation Army Camp Sebago
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
  • M(
    MainStay (Program of Opportunity Alliance)
    one grant, 2019 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Maine Needs Inc

We strive to help individuals and families in Maine meet their basic, material needs by providing donated clothing, hygiene products, household items, and other necessities. We focus our work on those starting life over from scratch:…

Human Services
2
Crossroads for Women Inc

Crossroads provides gender-responsive addiction and behavioral health treatment services in a safe and respectful environment so individuals and families can lead healthy lives.

Health
3
Locker Project

The locker project connects food-insecure children in maine with nourishing food to improve their learning capacity, health, and future.

Food & Nutrition
4
Rural Community Action Ministry

Our purpose is to work with people to meet their needs for safe and adequate shelter, clothing, food and basic well-being in a manner that maintains or improves their self worth and dignity.

Human Services
5
Maine Access Points

To recognize the resiliency of people who use drugs and to work in collaboration to create access points for overdose prevention and harm reduction services in Maine.

Health
6
Penobscot Community Health Center

Penobscot Community Health Center (PCHC) is a non-profit organization incorporated in 1997 that is governed by a Board of community volunteers and is the largest Federally Qualified Health Center in Maine. PCHC is driven by its mission…

Health
7
Mid-Maine Homeless Shelter Inc

Providing emergency food and shelter to homeless and displaced persons in central Maine.

Housing & Shelter
8
Greater Portland Immigrant Welcome Center

The Greater Portland Immigrant Welcome Center serves as a hub of collaboration that strengthens the immigrant community through language acquisition, economic integration and civic engagement.

Human Services
9
Preble Street

To provide accessible barrier-free services to empower people experiencing problems with homelessness, housing, hunger, and poverty and to advocate for solutions to those problems.

Human Services
10
Camden Area Christian Food Pantry

Provide food and basic necessities to individuals and families in need in the Camden, Maine area

Food & Nutrition
11
The Everly Project

Our mission is to provide trauma-informed harm reduction services to people who are unhoused in the Portland Metro area. Our focus is on mental health services, nursing care, extreme weather supplies, food and safer use supplies for people…

Health
12
Fork Food Lab

Fork Food Lab is a nonprofit food business incubator and shared commercial kitchen focused on growing the local food economy. We support the growth of sustainable Maine-based businesses by providing entrepreneurs with work space,…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Center for Grieving Children; the most unlike its peers is St Vincent DePaul Soup Kitchen. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
12/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Salvation Army: $15,325 · OtherSalvation ArmyPROJECT FEED: $5,700 · OtherPROJECT FEEDYMCA Otter Pond Day Camp: $5,250 · OtherYMCA Otter Pond Day CampIndividual grant recipient: $4,300 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSo Maine Agency on Ageing: $3,293 · OtherSo Maine Agency on AgeingTHE ROOT CELLAR: $3,050 · OtherSt Vincent DePaul Soup Kitchen: $2,400 · OtherAbba: $2,200 · OtherBoys and Girls Club: $2,150 · Other+24 more: $15,789 · Other+24 moreThe Opportunity Alliance: $21,131 · Human ServicesThe Opportunity AllianceSIMPLE GIFTS: $3,050 · Human ServicesSIMPLE GIFTSTHROUGH THESE DOORS: $2,550 · Human ServicesTHROUGH THESE DOORSLEARNINGWORKS: $1,450 · Human ServicesWayside Food Programs: $6,600 · Food & NutritionCULTIVATING COMMUNITY: $350 · Food & NutritionCOMMONSPACE: $2,000 · HealthABBA A WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER: $500 · Arts & CultureRUTH'S REUSABLE RESOURCES: $200 · EducationTHE CENTER FOR GRIEVING CHILDREN: $200 · Youth Development
Other$59,457Human Services$28,181Food & Nutrition$6,950Health$2,000Arts & Culture$500Education$200Youth Development$200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Opportunity Alliance: $21,131 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWayside Food Programs: $6,600 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSIMPLE GIFTS: $3,050 over 7y, 3.3% of budgetTHE ROOT CELLAR: $3,050 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHROUGH THESE DOORS: $2,550 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSt Vincent DePaul Soup Kitchen: $2,400 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetCOMMONSPACE: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLEARNINGWORKS: $1,450 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBig Brothers Big Sisters of Mid-Maine: $1,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetThe Iris Network: $700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetABBA A WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR GRIEVING CHILDREN: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Opportunity Alliance ↗
  • Who funds Wayside Food Programs ↗
  • Who funds SIMPLE GIFTS ↗
  • Who funds THE ROOT CELLAR ↗
  • Who funds THROUGH THESE DOORS ↗
  • Who funds St Vincent DePaul Soup Kitchen ↗
  • Who funds COMMONSPACE ↗
  • Who funds LEARNINGWORKS ↗
  • Who funds Big Brothers Big Sisters of Mid-Maine ↗
  • Who funds The Iris Network ↗
  • Who funds ABBA A WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CULTIVATING COMMUNITY ↗
  • Who funds RUTH'S REUSABLE RESOURCES ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR GRIEVING CHILDREN ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Maine Community Foundation IncME22.8× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Maine Community Foundation Inc · Portland Provident Association · Saco & Biddeford Savings Charitable Foundation · Stephen & Tabitha King Foundation Inc · Sam L Cohen Foundation · Fisher Charitable Foundation · United Way Inc · Simmons Foundation - PerkinsThompson · Good Shepherd Food Bank · John T Gorman Foundation · The Smith Family Charitable Ta · The Eunice Frye Home Foundation CO Thomas M Pierce HM Payson

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Female Samaritan Association funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Female Samaritan Association. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Female Samaritan Association?

    Find your warmest path to Female Samaritan Association through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Female Samaritan Association’s filings →

    More from the funding graph