Loading…
· Public charity
FEEDING GEORGIA INC
Feeding georgia maximizes the impact of 7 regional feeding america food banks.
$282k
Granted FY2024
8
Grants
2
Communities
$79k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2020–2024.
Food & Nutrition$6.7MOther$346k
02FY2024 · 8 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k3 grants · $21k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $120k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $79k
$32,732
Median grant
2
States reached
$535k
Total assets
Largest grants
- ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK$78,853
- FB OF NORTHEAST GA$35,656
- CHATTANOOGA AREA FOOD BANK$33,818
- FEEDING THE VALLEY FB$32,732
- GOLDEN HARVEST FB$17,500
- MIDDLE GEORGIA COMMUNITY FB$7,500
- AMERICA'S 2ND HARVEST OF COASTAL GA$7,500
- GEORGIA MOUNTAIN FOOD BANK$6,432
02The need
03
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 16% — the area typically sits at 12%. 90% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$7.1M · 9 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else
9 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
9
0
Total granted
$7.1M
$0
Still filing today
100%
0%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- A2AMERICA'S 2ND HARVEST OF COASTAL GA5× · 2020–2024 · $2.3M · revenue +178%
- FTFEEDING THE VALLEY FB5× · 2020–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +768%
- FOFB OF NORTHEAST GA5× · 2020–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +84%
Funded once
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Second Harvest Food Bank of Northeast Tn
To feed the hungry in ne tn by securing and distributing food and engaging the community.
Food & Nutrition
2
San Francisco Food Bank
To end hunger in san francisco and marin county.
—
3
Harvest Hope Food Bank
Harvest hope is south carolina's largest food bank, providing over 25 million meals on average to neighbors in need across the midlands, pee dee and upstate.
Food & Nutrition
4
Augusta Food Bank
The augusta food bank provides a supplemental source of food to individuals and families in need.
Food & Nutrition
5
Second Harvest Food Bank of East
Assess and address the nutritional needs of all people experiencing hunger in our 18 county east tennessee service area.
—
6
Food Bank for the Heartland
To eliminate hunger in the heartland by ensuring consistent access to healthy foods through community partnerships.
—
7
Heart of Alabama Food Bank
The food bank operates as a clearing house for the collection, sorting, storing and distribution of edible food to qualified agencies.
Food & Nutrition
8
Foodbank of Southeastern Virginia
Leading the effort to eliminate hunger in our community.
Food & Nutrition
9
The Food Bank of Northeast Arkansas
The food bank of northeast arkansas provides hunger relief to people in need by raising awareness, securing resources, and distributing food through a network of non-profit agencies and programs.
Human Services
10
Second Harvest Foodbank of North Central
To grow hope in our region by creating pathways to nutritious food.
Food & Nutrition
11
Fauquier Community Food Bank & Thrift Store
To fight hunger in fauquier county by providing our neighbors in need with nourishing food and encouraging self-sufficiency through vibrant community partnerships
Food & Nutrition
12
Second Harvest Food Bank of the
To solicit, store, and distribute food for hunger relief organizations feeding hungry people in columbiana, mahoning, and trumbull counties, and to provide education and advocacy.
Food & Nutrition
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chattanooga Area Food Bank Inc and the most unlike its peers is Second Harvest of. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network
9 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
9/9
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Food & Nutrition$6,738,268Other$346,030
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AMERICA'S 2ND HARVEST OF COASTAL GA ↗
- Who funds FEEDING THE VALLEY FB ↗
- Who funds FB OF NORTHEAST GA ↗
- Who funds CHATTANOOGA AREA FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds GOLDEN HARVEST FB ↗
- Who funds MIDDLE GEORGIA COMMUNITY FB ↗
- Who funds GEORGIA MOUNTAIN FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds SECOND HARVEST OF S GA FB ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
The Kroger Co Zero Hunger ZeroOH18.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: The Kroger Co Zero Hunger Zero · Atlanta Community Food Bank Inc · Georgia Power Foundation Inc · Feeding America · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Southern Poverty Law Center Inc · The Kroger Co Foundation · The Community Foundation for Greater · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation FEEDING GEORGIA INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: AMERICA'S 2ND HARVEST OF COASTAL GA.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
medium risk
~4 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 6 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
6 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.8× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 581442013 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on AMERICA'S 2ND HARVEST OF COASTAL GA, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 4 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 9% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Feeding Georgia Inc?
Find your warmest path to Feeding Georgia Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines