Skip to content

· Private foundation

Faye Murray & Mae Wardlaw Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$120k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$185kReligion$79kHealth$59kYouth Development$48kEducation$48kRecreation & Sports$35kPhilanthropy$30kAnimals$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $97k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE INN RECOVERY COMMUNITY$17,500
SALVATION ARMY$15,000
NAVARRO COLLEGE FOUNDATION$12,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER DALL$11,000
WADE WELLNESS SERVICES$11,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF NAVARRO COUNTY$10,000
COMPASSION CORSICANA$10,000
NAVARRO COUNTY YOUTH EXPOSITION$10,000
Individual grant recipient$7,500
NORTHSIDE BAPTIST CHURCH$7,500
MARTIN LUTHER KING CENTER$5,000
VOICE$2,000
HOPE CENTER$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–22, $29k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 65% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MEALS ON WHEELS NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS: $10k → 10%MARY PETERSON CHILD CARE CENTER: $14k → 23%MARY PETERSON CHILD CARE CENTER: $5k → 23%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$452k · 14 repeat orgs$102k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +76% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
8

Total granted

$452k
$57k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+76%
+16%

Still filing today

29%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $46k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationRecreation & SportsAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NC
    NAVARRO COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $48k · revenue +87%
  • HS
    HUMANE SOCIETY OF NAVARRO COUNTY
    3× · 2023–2025 · $25k · revenue +57%
  • MP
    MARY PETERSON CHILD CARE CENTER
    2× · 2021–2024 · $23k · revenue +76%

Funded once

  • FB
    FROST BASEBALL ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2024 · $15k
  • MO
    MEALS ON WHEELS NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS INC
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -9%
  • BS
    BAPTIST STUDENT MINISTRY
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
5/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NORTHSIDE BAPTIST CHURCH: $65,000 · OtherNORTHSIDE BAPTIST CHURCHSALVATION ARMY: $60,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYCOMPASSION CORSICANA: $40,000 · OtherCOMPASSION CORSICANABOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER DALL: $38,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER DALLUNITED WAY OF CORSICANA: $30,300 · OtherUNITED WAY OF CORSICANANAVARRO COUNTY AMBULATORY CARE: $30,000 · OtherNAVARRO COUNTY AMBULATORY CARECHRISTMAS IN ACTION: $26,500 · OtherCHRISTMAS IN ACTIONIndividual grant recipient: $22,500 · OtherTHE INN RECOVERY COMMUNITY: $17,500 · OtherFROST BASEBALL ASSOCIATION: $15,000 · OtherPRYSBYTERIAN CHILDREN SERVICES: $15,000 · Other+10 more: $63,192 · Other+10 moreNAVARRO COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $48,000 · EducationNAVARRO C…MARY PETERSON CHILD CARE CENTER: $23,276 · Human ServicesMEALS ON WHEELS NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesCHRISTMAS IN APRIL-NAVARRO COUNTY INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesHUMANE SOCIETY OF NAVARRO COUNTY: $25,000 · AnimalsCAMP OF THE RISING SUN: $20,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$422,992Education$48,000Human Services$38,276Animals$25,000Recreation & Sports$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNAVARRO COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $48,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF NAVARRO COUNTY: $25,000 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetMARY PETERSON CHILD CARE CENTER: $23,276 over 2y, 12% of budgetCAMP OF THE RISING SUN: $20,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NAVARRO COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF NAVARRO COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds MARY PETERSON CHILD CARE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CAMP OF THE RISING SUN ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTMAS IN APRIL-NAVARRO COUNTY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Pearl Thornell Charitable FoundationTX17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Pearl Thornell Charitable Foundation · J Tom Eady Charitable Trust · The Moran Family Foundation · Navarro Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Faye Murray & Mae Wardlaw Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Faye Murray & Mae Wardlaw Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Faye Murray & Mae Wardlaw’s filings →

    More from the funding graph