Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Faulkner Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$227k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$226k
Largest
01What you fund
0192% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Religion$1.1MInternational$23kHuman Services$12kHealth$6kPhilanthropy$5kEducation$3kArts & Culture$2kEnvironment$500Other$0
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $500
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $226k
$226,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS$226,000
JULIAN PATHWAYS$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $5k → 11%COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $1k → 11%COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $541 → 11%COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $512 → 11%COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $249 → 11%COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $98 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
ID
MN
IL
MI
NY
CA
UT
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.1M · 15 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +80% since the first grant, against +77% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
22

Total granted

$1.1M
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+80%
+77%

Still filing today

67%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHealthHousing & ShelterEducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER
    6× · 2018–2024 · $7k · revenue +190%
  • IR
    International Rescue Committee INC
    6× · 2018–2023 · $6k · revenue +80%
  • BC
    Backcountry Communities Thriving
    3× · 2022–2024 · $3k · revenue +257%

Funded once

  • GA
    GIVE A DAY OF LIFE
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
  • OR
    OUR RESCUEgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue +102%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Women's Refugee Commission Inc

To improve the lives and protect the rights of women, children and youth displaced by conflict and crisis. the women's refugee commission envisions a world in which refugees are safe, healthy and reliant and seeks to drive change in…

Human Services
2
Interval House

The mission of the organization is to ensure safety and stability for people who are battered, abused, homeless or at risk; to create public awareness about the epidemic of violence; and to mobilize the community to prevent violence and…

Human Services
3
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International
4
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
5
Episcopal Relief and Development

Episcopal relief & development (the organization") is an affiliate of the domestic and foreign missionary society of the protestant episcopal church of the united states of america (the "society or "dfms"). (see schedule o)

Human Services
6
International Committee of the Red Cross

The international committee of the red cross (switzerland)(icrc) is an impartial, neutral, and independent organization whose exclusively humanitarian mission is to protect the lives and dignity of victims of armed conflict and of violence…

International
7
Chemists Without Borders

Chemists without borders is a global humanitarian organization committed to sustainable and equitable solutions that empower communities and improve overall well-being. our strategic framework is: service - developing, facilitating, and…

Science & Tech
8
International Bridges to Justice

In recognition of the fundamental principles of the universal declaration of human rights, international bridges to justice (ibj) is dedicated to protecting the basic legal rights of ordinary citizens in developing countries. specifically,…

Crime & Legal
9
The San Francisco Particular Council of the Society of St Vincent De Paul

The mission of the st. vincent de paul society of san francisco (svdp-sf) is to offer hope and service on a direct person-to-person basis, working to break the cycles of homelessness and domestic violence.

Human Services
10
Crisis House

The mission of crisis house is to respond immediately to stop the cycle of domestic violence and homelessness and to connect families and individuals to crucial resources that empower them to renew their lives.

Human Services
11
California Partnership to End Domestic Violence

The organization's mission is to promote the collective voice of a diverse coalition of organizations and individuals working to eliminate all forms of domestic violence. as an advocate for sociate change, we advance our mission by…

Civil Rights
12
International Needs

International needs has the vision to transform lives and change communities by helping christian nationals serve both god and neighbor within their own countries.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Resource Center and the most unlike its peers is Hillsdale College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
16/20
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS — $687,466 · OtherCHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTSTHE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS — $398,000 · OtherTHE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS+26 more — $25,871 · OtherFORPEACE INC — $15,784 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER — $7,183 · Human ServicesInternational Rescue Committee INC — $5,865 · International+1 more — $200 · InternationalGOFUNDMEORG — $4,817 · PhilanthropyJULIAN PATHWAYS INC — $1,000 · EducationMONARCH SCHOOL PROJECT — $400 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEGE — $100 · EducationMothers Without Borders — $1,300 · Health+1 more — $20 · Health
Other$1,111,337Community Improvement$15,784Human Services$7,183International$6,065Philanthropy$4,817Education$1,500Health$1,320

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFORPEACE INC — $15,784 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER — $7,183 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $5,865 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGOFUNDMEORG — $4,817 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBackcountry Communities Thriving — $2,994 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetMothers Without Borders — $1,300 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJULIAN PATHWAYS INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOUR RESCUE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInterfaith Community Services Inc — $866 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJULIAN COMMUNITY HERITAGE FNDN (JCHF) — $600 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetOLIVENHAIN PIONEER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PTA — $510 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMONARCH SCHOOL PROJECT — $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAN DIEGO HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYAPAY BOLIVIA FOUNDATION — $200 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSAN DIEGO RESCUE MISSION INC — $171 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFAITH MATTERS FOUNDATION INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FORPEACE INC
  • Who funds COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC
  • Who funds GOFUNDMEORG
  • Who funds Backcountry Communities Thriving
  • Who funds Mothers Without Borders
  • Who funds JULIAN PATHWAYS INC
  • Who funds OUR RESCUE
  • Who funds Interfaith Community Services Inc
  • Who funds JULIAN COMMUNITY HERITAGE FNDN (JCHF)
  • Who funds OLIVENHAIN PIONEER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PTA
  • Who funds MONARCH SCHOOL PROJECT
  • Who funds SAN DIEGO HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC
  • Who funds YAPAY BOLIVIA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SAN DIEGO RESCUE MISSION INC
  • Who funds FAITH MATTERS FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC
  • Who funds ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE
  • Who funds AUTISM SPEAKS INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH11.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Faulkner Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph