· Public charity
Fargo-Moorhead Convention & Visitors Bureau Inc
The Fargo-Moorhead-West Fargo CVB works to position our distinctive community as a desirable destination and gateway to the region and nation, resulting in a superior Quality of Life for its residents.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 50% of Fargo-Moorhead Convention & Visitors Bureau Inc’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 3 grants below total $1,100,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,193,942 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $93,942 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FM Community Theatre | $500,000 |
| FM Science Museum | $300,000 |
| Concordia College | $300,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.
8 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $600k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NPNORTHERN PRAIRIE PERFORMING ARTS2× · 2021–2024 · $550k · revenue +19% · 31% of their budget
- RRRED RIVER ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY2× · 2020–2021 · $113k · revenue +51%
- FAFARGO AIR MUSEUM2× · 2018–2020 · $86k · revenue +30%
Funded once
- FRFM Rotary Foundationone grant, 2022 · $240k · revenue -66% · 78% of their budget
- FMFargo Metro Baseball Associationgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $150k · revenue +62%
- RRRED RIVER REGIONAL MARKSMANSHIP CTRone grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue -17%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Museum/educational center
Fargo Post 2 Baseball Club has been established to give players an opportunity to play the game of baseball. Giving 45 plus young men a chance to play competitive baseball in Fargo, ND.
The Corporation's mission is to promote, develop and administer a youth hockey program.
Dakota county historical society exists to preserve, interpret and promote the history of dakota county, minnesota.
Support and enhance the development of the arts in northwestern minnesota. facilitate and encourage the creation and appreciation of the arts.
Mission statement of the midwest museum: encouraging our community's appreciation of natural history using shared experiences through collections, exhibits, and education.
The purpose of the Foundation is to pursue unique fundraising opportunities and increase private sector support to further the development, growth, and excellence of the Park District in providing modernized facilities and quality…
To promote, foster, operate and maintain a fair, agricultural and livestock exposition, annually, at the red river valley fairgrounds, west fargo, cass county, north dakota
The organization is dedicated to preserving, restoring and educating others about the history of the region.
The league was originally formed in 1912 and in 1945 was recognized as a tax exempt organization by the irs. the league continues to encourage dynamic local leadership by providing educational opportunities and myriad of services to city…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Plains Art Museum and the most unlike its peers is Fargo Air Museum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 77 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MOORHEAD YOUTH HOCKEY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN PRAIRIE PERFORMING ARTS ↗
- Who funds CONCORDIA COLLEGE CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds FARGO-MOORHEAD SCIENCE MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds FM Rotary Foundation ↗
- Who funds Fargo Metro Baseball Association ↗
- Who funds RED RIVER ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds RED RIVER REGIONAL MARKSMANSHIP CTR ↗
- Who funds FARGO AIR MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds HISTORICAL & CULTURAL SOCIETY OF CLAY COUNTY ↗
- Who funds Fargo Theatre Management Corporation ↗
- Who funds FARGO AREA SPORTS ↗
- Who funds PLAINS ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds Cass County North Dakota Historical Society ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN PLAINS BOTANIC GARDEN SOCIETY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Fargo-Moorhead Area Foundation Corporation · Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Dakota Caring Foundation · Sanford Group Return · Alex Stern Family Foundation · Dakota Medical Foundation · Offutt Family Foundation · Midcontinent Foundation · The Arts Partnership of the Red Rive · Fred M Hector Jr Charitable Trust · The Barry Foundation · North Dakota Community Foundation · Bnsf Railway Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Fargo-Moorhead Convention & Visitors Bureau Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Fargo-Moorhead Convention & Visitors Bureau Inc?
Find your warmest path to Fargo-Moorhead Convention & Visitors Bureau Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.