· Private foundation
Fanny Edith Winn Educational Trust
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k20 grants · $70k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $119k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $52k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA AT LAFAYETTE | $51,800 |
| LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY | $42,000 |
| MCNEESE STATE UNIVERSITY | $32,500 |
| LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY AT EUNICE | $19,500 |
| ST MICHAEL CATHOLIC CHURCH | $15,000 |
| BLIND GRACE | $10,000 |
| ST PETER & PAUL CATHOLIC CHURCH | $7,500 |
| ST THERESA CHURCH | $7,500 |
| NORTHWESTERN STATE UNIVERSITY | $6,000 |
| CATHERAL OF ST JOHN THE EVANGELIST | $6,000 |
| IMMACULATE HEART OF MARY CHURCH | $6,000 |
| ST JOHN BERCHMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH | $5,000 |
| ST BERNADETTE CHURCH | $2,500 |
| ST ALOYSIUS CHURCH | $2,500 |
| OUR LADY STAR OF THE SEA PARISH | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 18%. 67% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
36 repeat relationships — 26 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BGBLIND GRACE4× · 2022–2025 · $40k · revenue +587% · 81% of their budget
- LULOYOLA UNIVERSITY3× · 2023–2025 · $8k · revenue +8%
- TATHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND2× · 2024–2025 · $5k · revenue +8%
Funded once
- LSLOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY AT SHREVEPORTone grant, 2024 · $2k
- UOUNIVERSITY OF NEW ORLEANSone grant, 2021 · $2k
SOUTHERN UNIVERTY SYSTEMone grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue +23%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The lsu foundation cultivates and invests in philanthropic partnerships to support and advance lsu's academic priorities.
The Foundation supports the development and promotion of Lamar University, its students, faculty and staff. The Lamar University Foundation supports and enhances Lamar University by encouraging the commitment of personal and financial…
The Southeastern Louisiana University Foundation (SLUF) is a 501(c)(3) corporation charged with securing, managing and stewarding private gifts in support of Southeastern Louisiana University. Private support increases the University's…
The University of New Orleans Foundation's mission is to promote the well-being and advancement of the University of New Orleans and all the colleges, schools, departments, and divisions comprising it, and to develop, expand, and improve…
Support university through engaging alumni.
The mission is to protect, promote, and foster the welfare of louisiana state university and to create and nurture mutually beneficial relationships between the university and its alumni and friends. the association, using the talents and…
To support any and all programs, facilities, research, and educational opportunities offered by the University of New Orleans and the University of Louisiana System.
The louisiana tech university foundation was organized to solicit, receive, hold, invest and transfer funds for the benefit of louisiana tech university. the foundation also assists louisiana tech university in meeting the criteria for…
Provides course of instruction in christian liberal arts at the undergraduate and graduate level, by persons of all genders taught by regular classroom instruction, correspondence or other means. higher education
Organization's mission loyola marymount university maintains a three-fold mission: 1)the encouragement of learning, 2) the education of the whole person, and 3)the service of faith and the promotion of justice.
The louisiana endowment for the humanities is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing educational opportunities to all louisianans. the mission is to provide all louisianans with access to and an appreciation of their own rich,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Louisiana At Monroe Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Blind Grace. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Baton Rouge Area Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Fanny Edith Winn Educational Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Fanny Edith Winn Educational Trust?
Find your warmest path to Fanny Edith Winn Educational Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.