· Public charity
Fanangel Foundation Inc
Fanangel Foundation exists to help schools, teams, bands, clubs and anyone else who needs to navigate modern fundraising.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 134 grants below total $2,103,690 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,206,457 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $102,767 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k61 grants · $453k
- $10k–50k68 grants · $1.3M
- $50k–250k5 grants · $344k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PENN HIGH SCHOOL | $91,426 |
| St Joseph High School | $83,022 |
| BRENNAN H S | $66,309 |
| MEAD MAVERICKS BOOSTERS INC | $52,307 |
| MAINE WEST HIGH SCHOOL | $51,025 |
| ERIE HIGH SCHOOL | $49,032 |
| MORRO BAY HIGH | $48,109 |
| GROVETOWN HIGH SCHOOL | $47,963 |
| LONGMONT HIGH SCHOOL | $42,597 |
| NATRONA COUNTY HIGH SCHOOL | $41,667 |
| LAWRENCE NORTH HIGH SCHOOL | $40,410 |
| KAMIAKIN HIGH SCHOOL BOOSTER CLUB | $39,198 |
| SENTINEL HIGH SCHOOL | $31,452 |
| Lebanon Valley College | $29,878 |
| LAKESHORE HIGH SCHOOL | $28,778 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 70% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.
149 repeat relationships — 88 still active in FY2024, 61 since wound down; 31 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $311k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FMFRIENDSWOOD MUSTANGS BOOSTER CLUB INC7× · 2018–2024 · $137k · revenue +497%
- KBKAMIAKIN BOOSTER CLUB3× · 2022–2024 · $104k · revenue +17%
- LVLoudoun Valley Vikings Athletic Assn6× · 2019–2024 · $91k · revenue +78% · 29% of their budget
Funded once
- VGVARIOUS GRANTS AND CONTRIBUTIONSone grant, 2019 · $297k
- IWINCARNATE WORD HIGH SCHOOLone grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue -23%
- AHARAGON HIGH SCHOOLone grant, 2019 · $20k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Support morton ranch athletes
Support student athletics
Donations to Cy-Springs High School for all athletic programs to help foster hard work, commitment and dedication to do well in the classroom and on the field.
To promote and provide support for all athletic teams at Tascosa High School.
High school band booster
Fundraising for high school athletics program
To support irvine High schools sports programs
High School Athletic Boosters
Supporting over 1200 student athletes
Houston High Cheer Booster Club is organized to foster promote and advance the Houston High School Cheerleading Squad by encouraging spirit throughout the school provide honors recognition and awards not provided by Houston High School…
The southridge suns boosters is a group of parents and community members who support southridge high school athletics and student activities. the booster club exists to aid school administration in providing memorable educational and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Vista Athletic Boosters and the most unlike its peers is Bard College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 18 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 14% of your grantees by number, and just 18% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
113 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 113 of the 304 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FRIENDSWOOD MUSTANGS BOOSTER CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds KAMIAKIN BOOSTER CLUB ↗
- Who funds Loudoun Valley Vikings Athletic Assn ↗
- Who funds CYPRESS HIGH SCHOOL BAND PAGEANTRY AND DRILL TEAM BOOSTER ↗
- Who funds Vista Ridge High School Athletic Booster Club ↗
- Who funds MIDLAND ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds MIDLAND CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds Falcons Athletic Club Inc ↗
- Who funds WESTSIDE WOLVES ATHLETIC BOOSTER CLUB INCW ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Project Lead the Way Inc · Round It Up America Inc · GenYOUTH Incorporated · For Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology (FIRST) · Project Lead the Way Inc · Share Our Strength · I Car Education Foundation · The George W Bush Foundation · University of Indianapolis · Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of Colorado · The Mr Holland's Opus Foundation · Digital Promise Global
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Fanangel Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.