Skip to content

· Private foundation

Fan Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$215k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0182% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Science & Tech$520kArts & Culture$185kEducation$165kHuman Services$70kPhilanthropy$50kHealth$40kYouth Development$35kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $200k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TRUSTEES OF TUFTS COLLEGE$30,000
MIT$25,000
CHINESE HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF NE$25,000
BOSTON CHINATOWN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER$20,000
HARVARD UNIVERSITY$20,000
ASIAN COMMUNITY FUND - THE BOSTON FOUNDATION$10,000
BROOKLINE TEEN CENTER$10,000
SOUTH COVE MANOR NURSING$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS BOSTON$10,000
UC BERKELEY FOUNDATION$10,000
ADDGENE$10,000
BROOKLINE LIBRARY FOUNDATION$5,000
BOSTON PUBLIC LIBRARY FUND$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $70k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%BOSTON CHINATOWN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $20k → 16%BOSTON CHINATOWN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $20k → 16%BOSTON CHINATOWN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $20k → 16%BOSTON CHINATOWN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$735k · 15 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +0% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
4

Total granted

$735k
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+0%

Still filing today

40%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Trustees of Tufts College
    5× · 2020–2024 · $120k · revenue +39%
  • BOSTON CHINATOWN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $70k · revenue +98%
  • BT
    BROOKLINE TEEN CENTER
    4× · 2020–2024 · $35k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • BE
    BROOKLINE EDUCATION FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue -4%
  • PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +6%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
Trustees of Boston University

Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…

—
3
Boston Foundation
Philanthropy
4
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
5
Trustees of Boston College

Mission strengthened by more than a century and a half of dedication to academic excellence, boston college commits itself to the highest standards of teaching and research in undergraduate, graduate and professional programs and to the…

Education
6
Trustees of the Public Library of the City of Boston

The Boston Public Library provides educational and cultural enrichment free to all by engaging the public through programming and active spaces, restoring and preserving our history, providing access to borrow from our vast collection of…

Education
7
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
8
New England Lawboston

New england law/boston dedicates itself to preparing students to be successful lawyers and leaders in the public and private sectors through integrated practical, theoretical and ethical education of the highest caliber and to contributing…

Education
9
Boston Library Consortium Inc

Boston library consortium, inc. (the organization or "blc") was incorporated in 1977 as amassachusetts not-for-profit corporation. blc is a library consortium serving public and privateuniversities, liberal arts colleges, state libraries,…

—
10
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
11
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
12
Marine Biological Laboratory

The Marine Biological Laboratory (MBL) is a world-renowned center for biological discovery and training that is notably affiliated with more than 60 Nobel Prize winners. Research is conducted by full-time faculty as well as hundreds of the…

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boston Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Brookline Teen Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

President and Fellows of Harvard College: $405,000 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Harvard CollegeTrustees of Tufts College: $120,000 · EducationTrustees of Tufts CollegeThe Brookline Library Foundation Inc: $20,000 · Education+2 more: $15,000 · EducationCHINESE HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF NE: $110,000 · OtherCHINESE HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF NEMIT: $105,000 · OtherMITUC BERKELEY FOUNDATION: $55,000 · OtherUC BERKELEY FOUNDATIONMUSEUM OF FINE ARTS BOSTON: $55,000 · OtherMUSEUM OF FINE ARTS BOSTONASIAN COMMUNITY FUND - THE BOSTON FOUNDATION: $40,000 · OtherASIAN COMMUNITY FUND - THE BOSTON FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $35,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSOUTH COVE MANOR NURSING: $30,000 · OtherSOUTH COVE MANOR NURSINGGREATER BOSTON GOLDEN AGE CENTER: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · Other+2 more: $15,000 · OtherBOSTON CHINATOWN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC: $70,000 · Human ServicesBROOKLINE TEEN CENTER: $35,000 · Youth DevelopmentBrookline High School 21st Century Fund Inc: $10,000 · PhilanthropyBoston Foundation Inc: $10,000 · PhilanthropyAddgene Inc: $10,000 · HealthJOSLIN DIABETES CENTER INC: $5,000 · Health
Education$560,000Other$485,000Human Services$70,000Youth Development$35,000Philanthropy$20,000Health$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $405,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTrustees of Tufts College: $120,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBOSTON CHINATOWN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC: $70,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetBROOKLINE TEEN CENTER: $35,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetThe Brookline Library Foundation Inc: $20,000 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetBrookline High School 21st Century Fund Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetBoston Foundation Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOSTON PUBLIC LIBRARY FUND INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAddgene Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBROOKLINE EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOSLIN DIABETES CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds Trustees of Tufts College ↗
  • Who funds BOSTON CHINATOWN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BROOKLINE TEEN CENTER ↗
  • Who funds The Brookline Library Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Brookline High School 21st Century Fund Inc ↗
  • Who funds Boston Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds BOSTON PUBLIC LIBRARY FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Addgene Inc ↗
  • Who funds BROOKLINE EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC ↗
  • Who funds JOSLIN DIABETES CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Allen & Franka Charlupski FoundationMA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Allen & Franka Charlupski Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fan Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fan Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Boston Chinatown Neighborhood Center Inc: 38% of income from government
  • Joslin Diabetes Center Inc: 35% of income from government
  • Trustees of Tufts College: 13% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Brookline Teen Center: 0% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Addgene Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Boston Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Fan Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph