· Public charity
Family Values Work a Multi-State Consortium
Grantmaking and technical support to movement network organizations focused on paid leave, paid sick and safe time, child care and other equitable and just care policies
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k10 grants · $372k
- $50k–250k26 grants · $2.9M
- $250k+1 grant · $372k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| 9TO5 NATIONAL ASSOC OF WORKING | $372,000 |
| FAMILY FORWARD OREGON | $215,350 |
| MOTHERING JUSTICE | $185,000 |
| NEW JERSEY CITIZEN ACTION EDU | $175,350 |
| WOMEN EMPLOYED | $171,000 |
| ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY INSTITUTE | $165,000 |
| COALITION FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE EDUCATION FUND | $140,000 |
| NORTH CAROLINA JUSTICE CENTER | $132,000 |
| RESTAURANT OPPORTUNITIES CENTERS UNITED INC | $130,149 |
| PUBLIC POLICY AND ED FUND | $125,000 |
| WORKER'S DEFENSE PROJECT INC | $125,000 |
| SHE LEADS JUSTICE | $120,000 |
| ISAIAH | $115,000 |
| PODER LATINX COLLECTIVE FUND | $110,000 |
| MAKE IT WORK NEVADA | $110,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 21% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +72% since the first grant, against +2% for the ones you funded once.
37 repeat relationships — 30 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $320k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
9TO5 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF WORKING WOMEN INC8× · 2017–2024 · $3.9M · revenue +177%- FFFAMILY FORWARD OREGON8× · 2017–2024 · $1.7M · revenue +182% · 32% of their budget
- MJMOTHERING JUSTICE8× · 2017–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +712%
Funded once
- CMCATALYST MONTANAone grant, 2017 · $45k · revenue -49%
- FVFAMILY VALUES WORK A MULTI-STATE CONSORTIUMgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $44k · revenue +44%
Forward Togetherone grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue -22%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…
The organization serves as a coalition of labor organizations, community groups, faith-based organizations, and student groups dedicated to protecting the rights of working people. To this end, the corporation shall engage in organizing…
Building support for the rights of working people through coalitions of labor and community and through public education.
Advance workers rights & social justice through building sustained relationships and taking direct action to create concrete change in the lives of working families
We are workers, united across different industries to improve our working conditions and our lives. We come together as working people to build power through education, organizing, and enforcement. We work to raise and uphold standards in…
To develop and advocate for legislation, regulations, ballot initiatives, and government programs as a voice of the working class, to promote social justice, and to stimulate the economy; and, to conduct research, educate the public, and…
We are workers, united across different industries to improve our working conditions and our lives. We come together as working people to build power through education, organizing, and enforcement. We work to raise and uphold standards in…
Fund for Justice is a nationally connected social impact research and advocacy organization that works to achieve fundamental, systemic reform by addressing policies and practicies that prevent individuals from reaching their full…
Towards justice is a nonprofit law firm that seeks to advance economic equity and worker power through impact litigation, strategic policy advocacy, and collaboration with organizers and public agencies. we were founded in response to the…
Southern coalition for social justice partners with communities of color and economically disadvantaged communities across the south to defend and advance their political, social, and economic rights. through an intersectional and…
Through grassroots people-powered advocacy and organizing, lwvnj trains, mobilizes, and educates advocates to have a greater voice in government and influence public policy.
The Central Ohio Worker Center is a non-profit organization that educates, empowers, and advocates for and with low-wage and immigrant workers in Central Ohio.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Domestic Workers Alliance Inc and the most unlike its peers is Peacock Consulting Services Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
52 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 52 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds 9TO5 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF WORKING WOMEN INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY FORWARD OREGON ↗
- Who funds MOTHERING JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds Economic Opportunity Institute ↗
- Who funds TIDES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COALITION FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
- Who funds NEW JERSEY CITIZEN ACTION EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
- Who funds PUBLIC POLICY AND EDUCATION FUND OF NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds WOMEN EMPLOYED ↗
- Who funds She Leads Justice Inc ↗
- Who funds NORTH CAROLINA JUSTICE CENTER ↗
- Who funds WORKERS DEFENSE PROJECT ↗
- Who funds The Women and Girls Foundation of Southwest Pennsylvania ↗
- Who funds TIDES ADVOCACY ↗
- Who funds ISAIAH ↗
- Who funds THE ECONOMIC PROGRESS INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds TAKEACTION MN EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds MAINE WOMEN'S LOBBY EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds HAWAII CHILDREN'S ACTION NETWORK ↗
- Who funds BUSINESS EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds JOB OPPORTUNITIES TASK FORCE INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN MAINE WORKERS CENTER ↗
- Who funds Florida Coalition On Black Civic Participation Inc ↗
- Who funds JEWS UNITED FOR JUSTICE INC ↗
- Who funds Jobs with Justice Education Fund ↗
- Who funds MANY LANGUAGES ONE VOICE ↗
- Who funds THE NEW YORK STATE PAID LEAVE COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds PEOPLE'S ACTION INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds PUBLIC JUSTICE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds PATHWAYS PA INC ↗
- Who funds RESTAURANT OPPORTUNITIES CENTERS UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL HISPANIC COUNCIL ON AGING ↗
- Who funds United Workers Association Inc ↗
- Who funds CORAZON AZ ↗
- Who funds National Coalition on Black Civic Partic ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL BLACK WORKER CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE FOR A JUST SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds Peacock Consulting Services Inc ↗
- Who funds National Domestic Workers Alliance Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Tides Foundation · New Venture Fund · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Hopewell Fund · The Ford Foundation · NEO Philanthropy Inc · Wellspring Philanthropic Fund Inc · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · National Domestic Workers Alliance Inc · Annie E Casey Foundation Inc · WK Kellogg Foundation · Windward Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Family Values Work a Multi-State Consortium funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- She Leads Justice Inc — 22% of income from government
- Vermont Community Loan Fund — 14% of income from government
- New Jersey Citizen Action Education Fund Inc — 9% of income from government
- Public Justice Center Inc — 5% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.