Skip to content
Family Support Services of North Florida Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Family Support Services of North Florida Inc

To be the leader in providing safety, stability, and quality of life for all children by working with the community to strenghten the family unit.

$84M
Granted FY2022
8
Grants FY2022
2
States reached
$8.0M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Human Services$96MHealth$6.6MYouth Development$2.9MArts & Culture$17kOther$0
02FY2022 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $16,999,776, the rows itemized in this filing. The $83,918,937 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $66,919,161 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k2 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $16k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $149k
  • $250k+4 grants · $17M
$318,009
Median grant
2
States reached
$16M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH FAMILY COMMUNITY SERVICE$7,988,415
DANIEL MEMORIAL$5,578,539
NATIONAL YOUTH ADVOCATE PROGRAM$2,933,717
CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY$318,009
CHILD GUIDANCE CENTER$148,969
Individual grant recipient$15,531
HARDBALL CREATIVE INC$9,570
TUCKERHALL INC$7,026
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $74.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 82% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY: $3.7M → 11%NEIGHBOR TO FAMILY: $2.7M → 14%NATIONAL YOUTH ADVOCATE PROGRAM: $2.9M → 15%CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY: $3.7M → 11%NEIGHBOR TO FAMILY: $2.6M → 14%NATIONAL YOUTH ADVOCATE PROGRAM: $2.9M → 15%CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY: $3.3M → 11%NEIGHBOR TO FAMILY: $1.0M → 14%NATIONAL YOUTH ADVOCATE PROGRAM: $2.0M → 15%CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY: $1.6M → 11%CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY: $475k → 11%CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY: $318k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY COMMUNITY SERVICES: $8.0M → 14%JEWISH FAMILY COMMUNITY SERVICE: $8.0M → 14%JEWISH FAMILY COMMUNITY SERVICES: $7.8M → 14%JEWISH FAMILY COMMUNITY SERVICES: $7.8M → 14%JEWISH FAMILY COMMUNITY SERVICES: $7.7M → 14%JEWISH FAMILY COMMUNITY SERVICES: $7.5M → 14%FSS DUVAL & NASSAU: $103k → 14%FSS DUVAL & NASSAU: $77k → 14%FSS DUVAL & NASSAU: $53k → 14%FSS DUVAL & NASSAU: $29k → 14%NORTHSIDE COMMUNITY INVOLVE: $41k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$104M · 8 repeat orgs$856k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2022, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
4

Total granted

$104M
$824k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+54%

Still filing today

100%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $32k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
Human ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TL
    THE LJD JEWISH FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $47M · revenue +35% · 61% of their budget
  • DM
    DANIEL MEMORIAL INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $29M · revenue +53% · 28% of their budget
  • NY
    NATIONAL YOUTH ADVOCATE PROGRAM INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $7.8M · revenue +120%

Funded once

  • MH
    MENTAL HEALTH RESOURCE CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $610k · revenue +25%
  • FP
    FLORIDA PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATES
    one grant, 2017 · $94k
  • SB
    SEDNET-SCHOOL BOARD OF CLAY COUNTY
    one grant, 2017 · $79k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rapid Resource for Families Inc
Human Services
2
Concern - Professional Services for Children Youth and Families

Concern's mission: concern brings hope, offers opportunity, and inspires change. concern's vision: to encourage growth and promote positive healthy lives.

Human Services
3
Citrus Health Network Inc

To provide primary care and behavioral health services to children, adults, and families in south florida across a broad range of health services and community-based programs; and to oversee the coordinated child welfare system of care…

—
4
The Child Center of Ny Inc

The child center of ny strengthens children and families with skills, opportunities, and emotional support to build healthy, successful lives.

—
5
Northeast Center for Youth and Families Inc

Provide a range of high-quality, community-based, behavioral health services to empower individuals and families to live healthy and successful lives.

Human Services
6
Northside Center for Child Development Inc

To foster the healthy development of children and families and seek to empower them to respond constructively to negative societal factors including racism and its related consequences. through comprehensive, high quality mental health and…

Education
7
Family and Children's Services of Centra

To transform the lives of children and adults by providing opportunities to build self-confidence, resilience and hope.

Human Services
8
Children's Case Management Organization Inc D/B/a Families First of Pb County

Families first of palm beach county, through innovative programs, promotes generational change by addressing families emotional, physical, and social well-being.

Environment
9
Family Foundations Counseling Services

The mission of Family Foundations Counseling Services is to prevent child abuse and neglect, to ensure the wellbeing of every child and youth we serve, and to aid in building strong resilient families.

Health
10
Thompson Child & Family Focus Inc

Founded in 1886, thompson child & family focus is called to strengthen children, families, and communitiesdelivering measurable outcomes through healing, teaching, worship, and play. for more than a century, thompson has transformed lives…

—
11
New Horizons Child and Family Services

New Horizons Child and Family Services (NHCFS) is a mental health outpatient provider dedicated to supporting underserved populations, at-risk youth, and formerly incarcerated individuals and their families. Our mission is to promote…

Health
12
Family & Children's Service of Ithaca Inc

Family and children's service of ithaca supports, promotes and strengthens the well-being of individuals and families by providing high-quality, accessible mental health care and related social services, with a particular sensitivity…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Neighbor to Family Inc; the most unlike its peers is Northside Community Involvement Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE LJD JEWISH FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $46,738,775 · Human ServicesTHE LJD JEWISH FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES INCTHE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF FLORIDA: $13,104,780 · Human ServicesTHE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF FLORIDANATIONAL YOUTH ADVOCATE PROGRAM INC: $7,808,761 · Human ServicesNATIONAL YOUTH ADVOCATE PROGRAM INCNEIGHBOR TO FAMILY INC: $6,357,867 · Human ServicesNEIGHBOR TO FAMILY INC+2 more: $302,990 · Human ServicesDANIEL MEMORIAL INC: $28,694,676 · HealthDANIEL MEMORIAL INC+2 more: $1,063,893 · HealthCHILD GUIDANCE CENTER INC: $914,005 · OtherFLORIDA PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATES: $94,000 · OtherSEDNET-SCHOOL BOARD OF CLAY COUNTY: $79,281 · Other+3 more: $32,127 · Other
Human Services$74,313,173Health$29,758,569Other$1,119,413

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE LJD JEWISH FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $46,738,775 over 6y, 61% of budgetDANIEL MEMORIAL INC: $28,694,676 over 6y, 28% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF FLORIDA: $13,104,780 over 6y, 3.3% of budgetNATIONAL YOUTH ADVOCATE PROGRAM INC: $7,808,761 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetNEIGHBOR TO FAMILY INC: $6,357,867 over 3y, 20% of budgetCHILD GUIDANCE CENTER INC: $914,005 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH RESOURCE CENTER INC: $610,092 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetMANAGED ACCESS TO CHILD HEALTH INC D/B/A PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILD HEALTH: $453,801 over 2y, 8.0% of budgetFAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES OF NORTH FLORIDA INC: $262,055 over 4y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lutheran Services Flo…United Way of Northea…The Bank of America C…Amazonsmile Foundation
Lutheran Services Florida IncFL15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lutheran Services Florida Inc · United Way of Northeast Florida Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Family Support Services of North Florida Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Family Support Services of North Florida Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Managed Access to Child Health Inc D/B/a Partnership for Child Health: 18% of income from government
  • The Children's Home Society of Florida: 6% of income from government
  • Mental Health Resource Center Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Family Support Services of North Florida Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Daniel Memorial Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Child Guidance Center Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Family Support Services of North Florida’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home