Skip to content
Family Policy Alliance at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Family Policy Alliance

Family Policy Alliance is a family advocacy organization that inspires men and women to live out biblical citizenship that transforms culture.

$133k
Granted FY2022
1
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$131k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Public Benefit$160kMembership Benefit$104kCivil Rights$82kEducation$29kPublic Safety & Disaster$10kHuman Services$10k
02FY2022 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$130,921
Median grant
1
States reached
$623k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Wyoming Family Alliance$130,921
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%North Carolina Values Coalition: $20k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
WA
WI
MA
WY
PA
KS
NC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Family Policy Council of West Virginia Inc

A servant organization that advocates for policies that embrace the sanctity of human life enrich marriages and the safeguard of religious freedom

Civil Rights
2
Catholic Action for Faith and Family

Catholic Action for Faith and Family is an association of Catholics that strives to uphold and defend Christian values inspired by the teachings of the Roman Catholic Church.The organization works in a legal and peaceful manner in the…

Religion
3
Frontline Policy Council Inc

To be a state-focused, biblical organization that could tactfully address issues of life, religious freedom, educational opportunity, Gods design, human dignity, free speech, and principled government.

Education
4
Florida Family Association Inc

To educate people on what they can do to defend protect and promote traditional biblical values.

Civil Rights
5
Pennsylvania Family Institute

Strengthening families by restoring the traditional, foundational principles and values.

Human Services
6
Family Policy Institute of Washington

Organization holds meetings to promote voter education as to the issues and the workings of the electoral process.

Civil Rights
7
North Dakota Family Alliance

To equip north dakotans to engage in god-honoring citizenship and advocate for policies that strengthen faith, family, and freedom.

Civil Rights
8
Texas Values Action

Texas values action directly advocates for faith, family and freedom in the political arena.

Community Improvement
9
Wisconsin Family Council

To advance judeo-christian principles and values in wisconsin by informing and inspiring individuals, churches and policy makers through research, resources and policy expertise to be involved in strengthening, preserving and promoting…

—
10
Hawaii Family Forum

To identify, develop, and support policies and programs that will ensure the preservation and strengthening of traditional Judeo-Christian family values.

Human Services
11
Liberty First Project Inc

Educating the public on the importance of protection our individual constitutional rights and freedoms as citizens of the United States and of Kansas and advancing public awareness of the traditional principles of limited government, free…

—
12
Value Them Both Association

The Value Them Both Coalition is made up of Kansas citizens and groups who believe every human life has value. We are committed to advocating across our state for the passage of the Value Them Both Amendment to ensure that Kansas can stop…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wisconsin Family Action; the most unlike its peers is Kansas Life Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Wyoming Family Alliance: $130,921 · Public BenefitWyoming Family AllianceWisconsin Family Action: $7,500 · Public BenefitWisconsin Family ActionKANSAS FAMILY VOICE INC: $104,417 · OtherKANSAS FAMILY VOICE INCKeep MA Safe: $10,000 · OtherKeep MA SafeSunshine Hill PAC: $8,000 · OtherSunshine Hill PACKansas Life Fund Inc: $7,666 · OtherKansas Life Fund IncPENNSYLVANIA FAMILY COUNCIL: $6,100 · OtherFLORIDA FAMILY ACTION INC: $50,457 · Civil RightsFLORIDA FAMILY AC…FPIW Action: $12,000 · Civil RightsFPIW ActionNORTH CAROLINA VALUES COALITION: $20,000 · Human ServicesThe Alaska Family Action Inc: $10,000 · Human ServicesFRONTLINE POLICY ACTION INC: $28,766 · Education
Public Benefit$138,421Other$136,183Civil Rights$62,457Human Services$30,000Education$28,766

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKANSAS FAMILY VOICE INC: $104,417 over 1y, 29% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA VALUES COALITION: $20,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetFPIW Action: $12,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetThe Alaska Family Action Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetWisconsin Family Action: $7,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA FAMILY COUNCIL: $6,100 over 1y, 1.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Family Policy Alliance funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Family Policy Alliance. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Family Policy Alliance’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home