Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Family Policy Alliance

Family Policy Alliance is a family advocacy organization that inspires men and women to live out biblical citizenship that transforms culture.

$133k
Granted FY2022
1
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$131k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172022.

Public Benefit$160kMembership Benefit$104kCivil Rights$82kEducation$29kPublic Safety & Disaster$10kHuman Services$10k
02FY2022 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$130,921
Median grant
1
States reached
$623k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Wyoming Family Alliance$130,921
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%North Carolina Values Coalition: $20k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
ME
WA
WI
MA
WY
PA
KS
NC
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Family Policy Council of West Virginia Inc

A servant organization that advocates for policies that embrace the sanctity of human life enrich marriages and the safeguard of religious freedom

Civil Rights
2
Catholic Action for Faith and Family

Catholic Action for Faith and Family is an association of Catholics that strives to uphold and defend Christian values inspired by the teachings of the Roman Catholic Church.The organization works in a legal and peaceful manner in the…

Religion
3
Frontline Policy Council Inc

To be a state-focused, biblical organization that could tactfully address issues of life, religious freedom, educational opportunity, Gods design, human dignity, free speech, and principled government.

Education
4
Florida Family Association Inc

To educate people on what they can do to defend protect and promote traditional biblical values.

Civil Rights
5
Pennsylvania Family Institute

Strengthening families by restoring the traditional, foundational principles and values.

Human Services
6
Family Policy Institute of Washington

Organization holds meetings to promote voter education as to the issues and the workings of the electoral process.

Civil Rights
7
North Dakota Family Alliance

To equip north dakotans to engage in god-honoring citizenship and advocate for policies that strengthen faith, family, and freedom.

Civil Rights
8
Texas Values Action

Texas values action directly advocates for faith, family and freedom in the political arena.

Community Improvement
9
Wisconsin Family Council

To advance judeo-christian principles and values in wisconsin by informing and inspiring individuals, churches and policy makers through research, resources and policy expertise to be involved in strengthening, preserving and promoting…

10
Hawaii Family Forum

To identify, develop, and support policies and programs that will ensure the preservation and strengthening of traditional Judeo-Christian family values.

Human Services
11
Liberty First Project Inc

Educating the public on the importance of protection our individual constitutional rights and freedoms as citizens of the United States and of Kansas and advancing public awareness of the traditional principles of limited government, free…

12
Value Them Both Association

The Value Them Both Coalition is made up of Kansas citizens and groups who believe every human life has value. We are committed to advocating across our state for the passage of the Value Them Both Amendment to ensure that Kansas can stop…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wisconsin Family Action and the most unlike its peers is Kansas Life Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Wyoming Family Alliance — $130,921 · Public BenefitWyoming Family AllianceWisconsin Family Action — $7,500 · Public BenefitWisconsin Family ActionKANSAS FAMILY VOICE INC — $104,417 · OtherKANSAS FAMILY VOICE INCKeep MA Safe — $10,000 · OtherKeep MA SafeSunshine Hill PAC — $8,000 · OtherSunshine Hill PACKansas Life Fund Inc — $7,666 · OtherKansas Life Fund IncPENNSYLVANIA FAMILY COUNCIL — $6,100 · OtherFLORIDA FAMILY ACTION INC — $50,457 · Civil RightsFLORIDA FAMILY AC…FPIW Action — $12,000 · Civil RightsFPIW ActionNORTH CAROLINA VALUES COALITION — $20,000 · Human ServicesThe Alaska Family Action Inc — $10,000 · Human ServicesFRONTLINE POLICY ACTION INC — $28,766 · Education
Public Benefit$138,421Other$136,183Civil Rights$62,457Human Services$30,000Education$28,766

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetKANSAS FAMILY VOICE INC — $104,417 over 1y, 29% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA VALUES COALITION — $20,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetFPIW Action — $12,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetThe Alaska Family Action Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetWisconsin Family Action — $7,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA FAMILY COUNCIL — $6,100 over 1y, 1.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Family Policy Alliance funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph