Skip to content

· Public charity

Family Planning Council of Iowa

The purpose of the FAMILY PLANNING COUNCIL OF IOWA is to assure access to quality reproductive healthcare and family planning for all people.

$1.8M
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$589k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$17M
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $50k–250k7 grants · $856k
  • $250k+2 grants · $955k
$130,937
Median grant
1
States reached
$762k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$589,427
COMMUNITY HEALTH CARE INC$366,036
PRIMARY HEALTH CARE INC$237,204
SIOUXLAND COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER$154,226
WOMEN'S HEALTH SERVICES$130,937
GREAT RIVER HEALTH SYSTEM$125,376
CRESCENT COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER$88,338
TRINITY MUSCATINE HEALTHCARE$60,654
TRINITY REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER DBA UNITYPOINT HEALTH FORT DODGE$59,748
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $644k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HILLCREST FAMILY SERVICES: $218k → 11%HILLCREST FAMILY SERVICES: $152k → 11%HILLCREST FAMILY SERVICES: $140k → 11%HILLCREST FAMILY SERVICES: $135k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$17M · 14 repeat orgs$237k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +67% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
2

Total granted

$17M
$177k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+67%
0%

Still filing today

71%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $60k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PH
    PRIMARY HEALTH CARE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.0M · revenue +75%
  • PP
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD NORTH CENTRAL STATES
    4× · 2022–2025 · $2.0M · revenue +15%
  • SC
    Siouxland Community Health Center
    8× · 2018–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +67%

Funded once

  • CI
    CENTRAL IOWA FAMILY PLANNING
    one grant, 2017 · $100k · 33% of their budget
  • JC
    JOHNSON COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT
    one grant, 2020 · $77k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
2
Community Health Centers of Southeastern Iowa Inc

To provide primary health care to residents of the greater se iowa region, especially those individuals/families with limited resources or with other barriers to health care. see schedule o for additional information.

Health
3
Southeast Iowa Regional Medical Center Inc

Southeast iowa regional medical center is dedicated to improving the region's health by providing high-quality care, world-class customer service, and uncompromising value for our patients and their families.

Health
4
Mercy Medical Center - Centerville

We, mercy medical center - centerville and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communitites. mercy medical center - centerville is a member of trinity…

Health
5
Community Health Care Inc

Community health care provides the communities we serve with excellence in patient-centered medical, dental, and behavioral health care that is compassionate, affordable, and accessible.

—
6
Pella Regional Health Center

The mission of pella regional health center is to provide healthcare and healing services with christian compassion.

Health
7
Heartland Community Health Clinic D/B/a Heartland Health Services

Provide affordable, high-quality health services and remove inequities to improve the lives of all.

Health
8
Eastern Iowa Health Center

Eastern Iowa Health Center provides accessible, high-quality healthcare services to those in need in the Linn County, Iowa area. Our services include family medicine, pediatrics, obstetrics and gynecology, labor and delivery, behavioral…

Health
9
Genesis Health System

We, genesis health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.

Health
10
Centracare Health System - Long Prairie

We're here for your whole life to listen, then serve, to guide and heal because health means everything.

Health
11
Iowa Physicians Clinic Medical Foundation

To improve the health of the people and communities we serve.

Health
12
Trinity Medical Center

The mission of trinity medical center is to improve the health of the people and communities we serve.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Primary Health Care Inc; the most unlike its peers is Planned Parenthood of the Heartland Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE HEARTLAND INC: $3,779,523 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE HEARTLAND INCPRIMARY HEALTH CARE INC: $2,015,310 · HealthPRIMARY HEALTH CARE INCPLANNED PARENTHOOD NORTH CENTRAL STATES: $1,995,003 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD NORTH CENTRAL STATESSiouxland Community Health Center: $1,384,436 · HealthSiouxland Community Health CenterWOMENS HLTH SERV OF EASTERN IA INC: $1,286,423 · HealthWOMENS HLTH SERV OF EASTERN IA INCGREAT RIVER HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $980,516 · HealthGREAT RIVER HEALTH SYSTEM INCUNITY HEALTHCARE: $715,441 · HealthUNITY HEALTHCARECrescent Community Health Center: $553,137 · Health+2 more: $277,515 · HealthCOMMUNITY HEALTH CARE INC: $1,808,402 · OtherCOMMUNITY HEALTH CARE …IA: $569,580 · OtherIACOUNTY OF JOHNSON: $498,625 · OtherCOUNTY OF JOHNSONGREATER SIOUX COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $247,548 · OtherGREATER SIOUX COMMUNIT…+2 more: $177,258 · Other+2 moreHillcrest Family Services Inc: $643,933 · Human Services
Health$12,987,304Other$3,301,413Human Services$643,933

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE HEARTLAND INC: $3,779,523 over 4y, 6.5% of budgetPRIMARY HEALTH CARE INC: $2,015,310 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD NORTH CENTRAL STATES: $1,995,003 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetSiouxland Community Health Center: $1,384,436 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetWOMENS HLTH SERV OF EASTERN IA INC: $1,286,423 over 9y, 25% of budgetGREAT RIVER HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $980,516 over 8y, 24% of budgetUNITY HEALTHCARE: $715,441 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetHillcrest Family Services Inc: $643,933 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetCrescent Community Health Center: $553,137 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetGREATER SIOUX COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $217,767 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetCENTRAL IOWA FAMILY PLANNING: $100,335 over 1y, 33% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE HEARTLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds PRIMARY HEALTH CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD NORTH CENTRAL STATES ↗
  • Who funds Siouxland Community Health Center ↗
  • Who funds WOMENS HLTH SERV OF EASTERN IA INC ↗
  • Who funds GREAT RIVER HEALTH SYSTEM INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITY HEALTHCARE ↗
  • Who funds Hillcrest Family Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds Crescent Community Health Center ↗
  • Who funds GREATER SIOUX COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL IOWA FAMILY PLANNING ↗
  • Who funds TRINITY REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Delta Dental of Iowa FoundationIA19.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Delta Dental of Iowa Foundation · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · American Heart Association Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Family Planning Council of Iowa funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Family Planning Council of Iowa. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Family Planning Council of Iowa’s filings →

    More from the funding graph