Skip to content
Family Endeavors Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Family Endeavors Inc

Driven by faith to serve those in need.

$16M
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$900k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$321MEmployment$4.0MHealth$305kEducation$255kReligion$250kPublic Benefit$66kCommunity Improvement$65kHousing & Shelter$49kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 11 grants below total $1,423,119, the rows itemized in this filing. The $16,366,911 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $14,943,792 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $136k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.2M
$25,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$279M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Endeavors Unlimited$900,000
Endeavors Health Service Board$300,000
University of Arizona Foundation$75,000
The University of Texas at El Paso$26,000
The University of Texas at San Antonio$25,000
Rebuilding Together Tampa Bay Inc$25,000
Fayetteville State University Foundation Inc$25,000
Texas Southern University Foundation$25,000
Coast Guard Foundation Inc$10,000
Rey Feo Scholarship Foundation$7,119
Providing Autism links & Support Inc$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $325.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%RED CROSS WEST TEXAS: $21k → 21%RED CROSS WEST TEXAS: $7k → 21%ENDEAVORS UNLIMITED INC: $5k → 16%Reach Resilience: $33.5M → 16%FAMILY ENDEAVORS FOUNDATION: $187.5M → 16%FAMILY ENDEAVORS FOUNDATION: $100.0M → 16%Endeavors Unlimited Inc: $1.1M → 16%Endeavors Unlimited: $900k → 16%ENDEAVORS UNLIMITED INC: $500k → 16%ENDEAVORS UNLIMITED INC: $500k → 16%ENDEAVORS UNLIMITED INC: $493k → 16%ENDEAVORS UNLIMITED INC: $480k → 16%Independent Housing Advocates Inc: $8k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$325M · 8 repeat orgs$619k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +44% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
10

Total granted

$325M
$171k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+23%

Still filing today

75%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $447k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterHealthPublic BenefitReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EU
    Endeavors Unlimited Inc
    7× · 2017–2024 · $4.0M · revenue +135% · 30% of their budget
  • FS
    FAYETTEVILLE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    3× · 2021–2024 · $60k · revenue +44%
  • CF
    CEO FORUM INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $40k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • CO
    City of Eagle Lake
    one grant, 2023 · $51k
  • TG
    THE GREATER SAN ANTONIO CHAMBER OF COMME
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -23%
  • HI
    HOLDING INSTITUTE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +226%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Austin Habitat for Humanity Inc

Through faith in action, austin habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

—
2
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
3
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
4
Texas Apartment Association Education Foundation

Educates texans about career opportunities in the rental housing industry and works with our local apartment association and workforce development partners to support training programs for those new to the industry.

Education
5
Volunteers of America Inc Volunteers of America Texas Calmont

Provides housing to disabled persons under section 811 of the national housing act under agreement with the department of hud.

—
6
Raise Texas

RAISE Texas advances equitable policies and programs that foster financial security and economic mobility for low- and moderate-income Texans. We equip, innovate and advocate to reduce disparities, remove barriers and build opportunities…

Human Services
7
Texas a&M Research Foundation

To facilitate research and development within the texas a&m university system and selected other entities.

Education
8
Central Houston Inc

See schedule ocentral houston champions a thriving downtown by connecting influential leaders through initiatives that advance the future of business and community for all.

—
9
Austin Affordable Housing Corporation

To ensure and preserve quality, affordable housing opportunities for low- to moderate-income families in austin as well as provide financial literacy and homeownership opportunities.

Housing & Shelter
10
Housing Plus

Innovatively utilize resources to preserve & create quality affordable multi-family housing committed to fulfilling individual housing needs and stabilize neighborhoods.

Housing & Shelter
11
Partnership Housing Inc

Partnership housing, inc. brings people together to build homes, communities and hope to realize our vision of a world where everyone has a decent place to live.

Housing & Shelter
12
Retirement Housing Foundation

To provide affordable housing and service coordination for persons with limited incomes in an inclusive environment that enhances their quality of life physically, mentally, and spiritually.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Arizona Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Holding Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
13/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

REACH RESILIENCE: $321,000,000 · Human ServicesREACH RESILIENCE+3 more: $4,014,893 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES ARCHDIOCESE OF SAN ANTONIO INC: $225,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASO: $53,000 · OtherCity of Eagle Lake: $51,000 · OtherTHE GREATER SAN ANTONIO CHAMBER OF COMME: $25,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO: $25,000 · Other+4 more: $31,451 · OtherEndeavors Health Services Board: $300,000 · Health+1 more: $5,000 · HealthUniversity of Arizona Foundation: $75,000 · EducationFAYETTEVILLE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $60,000 · EducationCEO FORUM INC: $40,000 · EducationTEXAS SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIO: $35,000 · EducationHOLDING INSTITUTE INC: $25,000 · Education+1 more: $7,119 · EducationREBUILDING TOGETHER GREATER FLORIDA INC: $25,000 · Housing & ShelterURBAN ALLIANCE INC MONARCH PLACE APTS: $8,000 · Housing & ShelterIndependent Housing Advocates Pecan Valley Inc (Viceroy Village Apts)): $8,000 · Housing & ShelterINTERFAITH WELCOME COALITION: $25,000 · ReligionGlobal Impact: $10,000 · International
Human Services$325,014,893Other$410,451Health$305,000Education$242,119Housing & Shelter$41,000Religion$25,000International$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetREACH RESILIENCE: $321,000,000 over 3y, 100% of budgetEndeavors Unlimited Inc: $3,978,198 over 7y, 30% of budgetEndeavors Health Services Board: $300,000 over 1y, 36% of budgetUniversity of Arizona Foundation: $75,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAYETTEVILLE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetCEO FORUM INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTEXAS SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIO: $35,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $28,695 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GREATER SAN ANTONIO CHAMBER OF COMME: $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER GREATER FLORIDA INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetINTERFAITH WELCOME COALITION: $25,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetGlobal Impact: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOAST GUARD FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetURBAN ALLIANCE INC MONARCH PLACE APTS: $8,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetIndependent Housing Advocates Pecan Valley Inc (Viceroy Village Apts)): $8,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetIndependent Housing Advocates Inc Regal Village Apartments: $8,000 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetWitte Museum: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetREY FEO SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $7,119 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetProviding Autism Links & Support Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Blackbaud Giving …Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Blackbaud Giving FundSC9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Family Endeavors Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Family Endeavors Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Family Endeavors’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home