· Public charity
Family Endeavors Inc
Driven by faith to serve those in need.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 11 grants below total $1,423,119 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $16,366,911 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $14,943,792 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $12k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $136k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
- $250k+2 grants · $1.2M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Endeavors Unlimited | $900,000 |
| Endeavors Health Service Board | $300,000 |
| University of Arizona Foundation | $75,000 |
| The University of Texas at El Paso | $26,000 |
| Rebuilding Together Tampa Bay Inc | $25,000 |
| Texas Southern University Foundation | $25,000 |
| The University of Texas at San Antonio | $25,000 |
| Fayetteville State University Foundation Inc | $25,000 |
| Coast Guard Foundation Inc | $10,000 |
| Rey Feo Scholarship Foundation | $7,119 |
| Providing Autism links & Support Inc | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $325.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.
8 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $447k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- EUEndeavors Unlimited Inc7× · 2017–2024 · $4.0M · revenue +135% · 30% of their budget
- FSFAYETTEVILLE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION3× · 2021–2024 · $60k · revenue +44%
- CFCEO FORUM INC2× · 2022–2023 · $40k · revenue +4%
Funded once
- COCity of Eagle Lakeone grant, 2023 · $51k
- TGTHE GREATER SAN ANTONIO CHAMBER OF COMMEone grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -23%
- HIHOLDING INSTITUTE INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +226%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Through faith in action, austin habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.
To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…
As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.
Educates texans about career opportunities in the rental housing industry and works with our local apartment association and workforce development partners to support training programs for those new to the industry.
Provides housing to disabled persons under section 811 of the national housing act under agreement with the department of hud.
RAISE Texas advances equitable policies and programs that foster financial security and economic mobility for low- and moderate-income Texans. We equip, innovate and advocate to reduce disparities, remove barriers and build opportunities…
To facilitate research and development within the texas a&m university system and selected other entities.
See schedule ocentral houston champions a thriving downtown by connecting influential leaders through initiatives that advance the future of business and community for all.
To ensure and preserve quality, affordable housing opportunities for low- to moderate-income families in austin as well as provide financial literacy and homeownership opportunities.
Innovatively utilize resources to preserve & create quality affordable multi-family housing committed to fulfilling individual housing needs and stabilize neighborhoods.
Partnership housing, inc. brings people together to build homes, communities and hope to realize our vision of a world where everyone has a decent place to live.
To provide affordable housing and service coordination for persons with limited incomes in an inclusive environment that enhances their quality of life physically, mentally, and spiritually.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Arizona Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Holding Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 14% of your grantees by number, and just 99% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds REACH RESILIENCE ↗
- Who funds Endeavors Unlimited Inc ↗
- Who funds Endeavors Health Services Board ↗
- Who funds University of Arizona Foundation ↗
- Who funds FAYETTEVILLE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CEO FORUM INC ↗
- Who funds TEXAS SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIO ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds THE GREATER SAN ANTONIO CHAMBER OF COMME ↗
- Who funds HOLDING INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER GREATER FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds INTERFAITH WELCOME COALITION ↗
- Who funds Global Impact ↗
- Who funds COAST GUARD FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds URBAN ALLIANCE INC MONARCH PLACE APTS ↗
- Who funds Independent Housing Advocates Pecan Valley Inc (Viceroy Village Apts)) ↗
- Who funds Independent Housing Advocates Inc Regal Village Apartments ↗
- Who funds Witte Museum ↗
- Who funds REY FEO SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Providing Autism Links & Support Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Family Endeavors Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.