Skip to content

· Private foundation

Falconwood Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$3.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
142
Grants FY2024still arriving
23
States reached
$525k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Philanthropy$6.6MHealth$2.1MEducation$1.4MEnvironment$1.1MHuman Services$1.1MCivil Rights$1.0MInternational$868kPublic Benefit$585kOther$0
02FY2024 · 142 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k71 grants · $221k
  • $10k–50k60 grants · $1.3M
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $632k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.2M
$10,000
Median grant
23
States reached
$3.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WORKMONEY FOUNDATION INC$525,000
THE BRIGHTWATER FUND$400,000
THE YEP FOUNDATION$268,250
GALAXY GIVES (GLOBAL IMPACT)$120,473
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA$109,000
ACLU FOUNDATION$107,500
GOODNATION (ONE FOR DEMOCRACY)$70,000
Individual grant recipient$60,330
WILDLIFE CONSERVATION SOCIETY$60,000
BARD PRISON INITIATIVE$55,000
MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER$50,000
GREENPEACE FUND INC$45,000
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL$45,000
NEW YORKERS FOR CHILDREN$43,750
DRUG POLICY ALLIANCE$43,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 89% of grant dollars ($15M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 11% that went abroad ($1.8M) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 78% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FREEDOM OF THE PRESS FOUNDATION: $25k → 10%THE STISSING CENTER: $10k → 9%THE CARVER CENTER: $33k → 9%WORKMONEY FOUNDATION INC: $525k → 17%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $8k → 7%THE STISSING CENTER: $6k → 9%THE CARVER CENTER: $27k → 9%LUND FAMILY CENTER INC: $5k → 10%THE CARVER CENTER: $26k → 9%JOYFUL HEART FOUNDATION: $5k → 20%LUND FAMILY CENTER INC: $5k → 10%THE CARVER CENTER: $25k → 9%HOT BREAD KITCHEN: $14k → 17%HOT BREAD KITCHEN: $6k → 17%HOT BREAD KITCHEN: $6k → 17%FREEDOM READS: $5k → 12%WELLBEINGS: $18k → 17%CHILDREN OF THE NIGHT: $15k → 14%CHILDREN OF THE NIGHT: $15k → 14%CHILDREN OF THE NIGHT: $15k → 14%SOCIETY TO AID RETARDED INC: $4k → 14%GOOD FOUNDATION: $25k → 17%GOOD FOUNDATION: $25k → 17%SOCIETY TO AID RETARDED INC: $3k → 14%GOOD FOUNDATION: $25k → 17%GOOD FOUNDATION: $25k → 17%SOCIETY TO AID RETARDED INC: $3k → 14%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS: $2k → 17%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS: $2k → 17%RIP MEDICAL DEBT: $56k → 9%RIP MEDICAL DEBT: $38k → 9%RIP MEDICAL DEBT: $5k → 9%GO CAMPAIGN: $10k → 14%GO CAMPAIGN: $10k → 14%GO CAMPAIGN: $8k → 14%GO CAMPAIGN: $8k → 14%GO CAMPAIGN: $5k → 14%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $5k → 17%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $3k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $10k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $10k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $5k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $5k → 17%BRIGID ALLIANCE: $3k → 17%ASSOCIATION TO BENEFIT CHILDREN: $20k → 17%ASSOCIATION TO BENEFIT CHILDREN: $20k → 17%GIRLS WHO CODE: $3k → 17%ASSOCIATION TO BENEFIT CHILDREN: $15k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
WA
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
VA
MD
TN
NC
DC
OK
AL
FL

Beyond the US: 11% of all-years giving ($1.8M)

2 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
British Virgin Islands$1.7M · 16 grants
Germany$111k · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 14% of Falconwood Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Falconwood Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 11% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$12M · 158 repeat orgs$2.9M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +24% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

158 repeat relationships: 110 still active in FY2024, 48 since wound down; 30 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

158
68

Total granted

$12M
$1.9M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+16%

Still filing today

76%
65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $982k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEnvironmentArts & CultureEducationHealthCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $775k · revenue +65%
  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $552k · revenue +40%
  • BARD COLLEGE
    5× · 2020–2024 · $483k · revenue +151%

Funded once

  • G
    GOODNATION
    one grant, 2020 · $851k
  • TE
    The Eisenhower Project Inc
    one grant, 2020 · $176k · revenue -100% · 30% of their budget
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $111k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
2
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
3
Peter G Peterson Institute for International Economics

The peterson institute for international economics (piie) is an independent nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization dedicated to strengthening prosperity and human welfare in the global economy through expert analysis and practical…

Social Science
4
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
5
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
6
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
7
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
8
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
9
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
10
National Public Radio Inc

National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…

Arts & Culture
11
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
12
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is People Power Initiatives Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Gere Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

188 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 188 of the 261 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
29
Early backer (in before they grew)
188/188
Grantees still filing
122/188
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE YEP FOUNDATION: $1,344,780 · OtherTHE YEP FOUNDATIONGOODNATION: $851,000 · OtherGOODNATIONNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL CO DMP: $336,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $313,368 · Other+118 more: $4,421,999 · Other+118 moreThe Brightwater Fund: $2,233,782 · PhilanthropyThe Brightwater FundTIDES FOUNDATION: $2,000,000 · PhilanthropyTIDES FOUNDATION+5 more: $82,500 · PhilanthropyBARD COLLEGE: $482,750 · EducationBARD COLL…KHAN ACADEMY INC: $179,000 · EducationKHAN ACAD…The Eisenhower Project Inc: $176,000 · EducationThe Eisen…The Trustees of Princeton University: $125,000 · EducationThe Trust…ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $100,000 · EducationICAHN SCH…ABC INC OF NEW CANAAN: $65,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND: $60,000 · EducationWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $59,750 · Education+13 more: $226,400 · Education+13 moreWORKMONEY FOUNDATION INC: $525,000 · Human ServicesMEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC: $138,750 · Human ServicesPORT CHESTER CARVER CENTER INC: $110,500 · Human ServicesGOOD PLUS FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 · Human ServicesASSOCIATION TO BENEFIT CHILDREN: $55,000 · Human ServicesChildren of the Night: $45,000 · Human ServicesGo Campaign: $40,000 · Human Services+11 more: $158,250 · Human ServicesPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $552,175 · HealthDRUG POLICY ALLIANCE: $142,500 · HealthALLEN INSTITUTE: $100,000 · HealthWhite Plains Hospital Medical Center: $87,500 · HealthTHE MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $53,000 · Health+12 more: $195,250 · HealthAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $775,125 · Civil RightsNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC: $100,000 · Civil RightsPrison Policy Initiative: $82,500 · Civil RightsEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $45,000 · Civil Rights+4 more: $70,000 · Civil RightsINSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION INC: $294,500 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INC: $170,500 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $137,500 · InternationalAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC: $42,500 · International+3 more: $24,000 · International
Other$7,267,147Philanthropy$4,316,282Education$1,473,900Human Services$1,172,500Health$1,130,425Civil Rights$1,072,625International$669,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Brightwater Fund: $2,233,782 over 5y, 73% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION: $2,000,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $775,125 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $552,175 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWORKMONEY FOUNDATION INC: $525,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBARD COLLEGE: $482,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION INC: $294,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetKHAN ACADEMY INC: $179,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetThe Eisenhower Project Inc: $176,000 over 1y, 30% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $170,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MARSHALL PROJECT INC: $156,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetNEW YORKERS FOR CHILDREN INC: $154,750 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetSOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER: $152,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetDRUG POLICY ALLIANCE: $142,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetMEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC: $138,750 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $137,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe Trustees of Princeton University: $125,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BAIL PROJECT INC: $122,700 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetFOODCORPS INC: $120,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetGREENPEACE FUND INC: $115,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPORT CHESTER CARVER CENTER INC: $110,500 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetThe Center for Investigative Reporting Inc: $105,000 over 5y, 7.5% of budgetTHE KEEWAYDIN FOUNDATION: $105,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVERA INSTITUTE OF JUSTICE INC: $100,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC: $100,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGOOD PLUS FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetALLEN INSTITUTE: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $95,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL WORKING GROUP: $90,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetWildlife Conservation Society: $88,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWhite Plains Hospital Medical Center: $87,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY: $85,600 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPrison Policy Initiative: $82,500 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $75,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF MONMOUTH COUNTY: $70,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetABC INC OF NEW CANAAN: $65,000 over 3y, 8.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND: $60,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $59,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetASSOCIATION TO BENEFIT CHILDREN: $55,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetX PRIZE FOUNDATION INC: $54,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $53,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetNatureServe: $52,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE AMERICAN FILM INSTITUTE: $51,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetChildren of the Night: $45,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $45,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $45,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGRAMERCY PARK BLOCK ASSOC INC: $44,000 over 5y, 2.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Brightwater Fund ↗
  • Who funds TIDES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds WORKMONEY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BARD COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds KHAN ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds The Eisenhower Project Inc ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MARSHALL PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORKERS FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER ↗
  • Who funds DRUG POLICY ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds MEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds The Trustees of Princeton University ↗
  • Who funds THE BAIL PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds FOODCORPS INC ↗
  • Who funds GREENPEACE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds PORT CHESTER CARVER CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds The Center for Investigative Reporting Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE KEEWAYDIN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI ↗
  • Who funds VERA INSTITUTE OF JUSTICE INC ↗
  • Who funds NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds GOOD PLUS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ALLEN INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL WORKING GROUP ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY22.2× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Triangle Community Foundation Inc · The Bessemer Giving Fund · The Ford Foundation · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · The New York Community Trust · Wellspring Philanthropic Fund Inc · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Analog Devices Foundation · The Jm Kaplan Fund Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Falconwood Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Falconwood Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 130%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Lund Family Center Inc: 34% of income from government
  • Foodcorps Inc: 21% of income from government
  • Freedom Reads Inc: 12% of income from government
  • Sea Education Association Inc: 12% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Princeton University: 11% of income from government
  • Community Foundation for Nantucket Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Nantucket Maria Mitchell Association in: 9% of income from government
  • Northeastern University: 7% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children: 6% of income from government
  • Connecticut Foodshare Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Birdscaribbean: 4% of income from government
  • Shatterproof a Nonprofit Corporation: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
13get no government money at all
34report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Falconwood Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Falconwood Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 261 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Falconwood’s filings →

More from the funding graph