Skip to content

· Private foundation

Faith Home Inc

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$24k
Granted FY2026still arriving
13
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Youth Development$128kHuman Services$15kEducation$12kFood & Nutrition$7kPhilanthropy$3kArts & Culture$2k
02FY2026 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$303k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$9,365
Individual grant recipient$2,250
Merrimack Valley Food Bank$2,000
Calvary Baptist Church-Teens Alive$1,500
Kids in Tech$1,250
Girls Inc$1,000
End 68 Hours of Hunger$1,000
Catholic Charities for GAP$1,000
Greater Lowell Family YMCA$1,000
The Wish Project$1,000
Open Pantry of Greater Lowell$1,000
Project Learn$1,000
Discovery Museum$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–26, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%Greater Lowell Family YMCA: $1k → 8%Greater Lowell Family YMCA: $1k → 8%Greater Lowell Family YMCA: $1k → 8%Greater Lowell Family YMCA: $1k → 8%Greater Lowell Family YMCA: $1k → 8%Greater Lowell Family YMCA: $1k → 8%Greater Lowell Family YMCA: $500 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$189k · 18 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2026, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
2

Total granted

$189k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+60%

Still filing today

44%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
EducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesFood & NutritionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TW
    THE WISH PROJECT
    10× · 2017–2026 · $11k · revenue +154%
  • PL
    PROJECT LEARN INC
    7× · 2020–2026 · $8k · revenue +56%
  • KI
    KIDS IN TECH INC
    6× · 2021–2026 · $7k · revenue +189%

Funded once

  • TS
    The Salvation Army
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • DF
    DEMOULAS FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +60%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lowell Farm and Wildlife Center
Animals
2
Locker Project

The locker project connects food-insecure children in maine with nourishing food to improve their learning capacity, health, and future.

Food & Nutrition
3
Greater Lowell Workforce Dev Board Inc dba Masshire Greater Lowell Workforce
—
4
Lowell Sun Charities Inc

Raise funds for charitable causes as well as needy families in the greater lowell area.

Philanthropy
5
Greater Boston Food Bank Inc

Our costs consist of acquiring, sorting and distributing food to 617 member agencies, transportation and logistics, and community outreach to 69 direct distribution sites such as gbfb mobile markets, and federal distributions for low…

—
6
Lowell Makes Inc

Lowell makes is a collection of open workshops and laboratories where members and students can collaborate to learn, share, and hone crafts of all kinds. the focus is on providing a space for education, entrepreneurship, and engagement…

Arts & Culture
7
Danvers Educational Enrichment Program
—
8
West Bridgewater Food Pantry Inc

To supply the necessary food to needy residents

Food & Nutrition
9
Little Compton Food Bank

Provide nourishing food and basic necessities to the residents of Little Compton and Tiverton Rhode Island.

Food & Nutrition
10
Medway Village Food Pantry Inc

The medway village food pantry is a 100% choice pantry serving over 2,500 children, adults, and seniors in metrowest ma. each week clients may choose from a wide variety of items including fresh produce, eggs, cheese, shelf-stable foods,…

Food & Nutrition
11
Tewksbury Community Pantry Inc

The heart of the tewksbury community pantry's mission lies in our commitment to assist residents of tewksbury facing hardships. we extend beyond mere food distribution, offering guidance towards additional resources, ensuring our clients…

Human Services
12
Got Lunch Laconia

Got Lunch Laconia is a community based effort created to address the food insecurity of Laconia's children who receive free and reduced school lunch during the school year. Our mission is to address this need by delivering healthy…

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Lowell Family Ymca; the most unlike its peers is Demoulas Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $51,364 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $24,600 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCalvary Baptist Church-Teens Alive: $16,100 · OtherCalvary Baptist Church-Teens AliveCatholic Charities for GAP: $12,925 · OtherCatholic Charities for GAPLowell Community Health: $12,300 · OtherLowell Community HealthTHE WISH PROJECT: $10,900 · OtherTHE WISH PROJECTGirls Inc: $8,000 · OtherLife Saver Ministries-My Father's H: $5,700 · Other+6 more: $18,300 · Other+6 morePROJECT LEARN INC: $7,700 · EducationKIDS IN TECH INC: $6,600 · EducationGREATER LOWELL FAMILY YMCA: $6,500 · Human ServicesMERRIMACK VALLEY FOOD BANK INC: $5,000 · Food & NutritionIts all about the Kids Foundation Inc: $3,000 · PhilanthropyDISCOVERY MUSEUM INC: $2,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$160,189Education$14,300Human Services$6,500Food & Nutrition$5,000Philanthropy$3,000Arts & Culture$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE WISH PROJECT: $10,900 over 10y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT LEARN INC: $7,700 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetKIDS IN TECH INC: $6,600 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetGREATER LOWELL FAMILY YMCA: $6,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMERRIMACK VALLEY FOOD BANK INC: $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Open Pantry of Greater Lowell Inc: $4,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetIts all about the Kids Foundation Inc: $3,000 over 3y, 9.1% of budgetDISCOVERY MUSEUM INC: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE WISH PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT LEARN INC ↗
  • Who funds KIDS IN TECH INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER LOWELL FAMILY YMCA ↗
  • Who funds MERRIMACK VALLEY FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds The Open Pantry of Greater Lowell Inc ↗
  • Who funds Its all about the Kids Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds DISCOVERY MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds DEMOULAS FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Lowell Community Foundation IncMA17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Lowell Community Foundation Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Theodore Edson Parker Foundation · DCU for Kids · Trustees of the Ayer Home · The Saab Family Foundation · We Share A Common Thread Foundation Inc · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Faith Home Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Faith Home Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Kids in Tech Inc: 15% of income from government
  • Project Learn Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Merrimack Valley Food Bank Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Discovery Museum Inc: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Faith Home Inc?

Find your warmest path to Faith Home Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Faith Home’s filings →

More from the funding graph