Skip to content

Maryland · Public charity

Fairvote Action

FAIRVOTE ACTION campaigns for better elections for all. We win voting reforms that make democracy more functional and representative for every american.

$443k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
7
Grants FY2024
4
Organizations funded FY2023
75%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$25,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$285,000
Organizations funded a year
1 to 10
FY2018 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
7
Total assets, FY2024
$583k

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 75% of the organizations Fairvote Action funded were first-time grantees, receiving 74% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 26% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $72k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23
Civil RightsPublic BenefitEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving7$440k86%
FY20234$97k75%
FY202210$643k90%
FY20211$30k100%
FY20208$115k50%
FY20197$131k100%
FY20185$20kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Public Benefit$1.4MEnvironment$40kCivil Rights$6k

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
VT
WA
MN
IL
MI
MA
OR
NV
WY
IA
CA
CO
MO
VA
KS
DC
HI
TX

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2018 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Ranked Choice Voting for Seattle$390,0001n/a
Make All Votes Count DC$310,0002n/a
Portlanders for Charter Reform$75,00019%
Kansas Democratic Party$60,0002n/a
Wyoming Democratic Party$60,0002n/a
California RCV Institute Inc$50,000131%
Oregonians for Better Elections$50,0001n/a
Ranked Choice Voting for Clark County$50,0001n/a
California RCV Coalition Inc$40,000237%
Vermont Public Interest Research Group Inc$40,00022%
Show all 34 grantees
All grantees of Fairvote Action by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Ranked Choice Voting for Seattle$390,0001n/a
Make All Votes Count DC$310,0002n/a
Portlanders for Charter Reform$75,00019%
Kansas Democratic Party$60,0002n/a
Wyoming Democratic Party$60,0002n/a
California RCV Institute Inc$50,000131%
Oregonians for Better Elections$50,0001n/a
Ranked Choice Voting for Clark County$50,0001n/a
California RCV Coalition Inc$40,000237%
Vermont Public Interest Research Group Inc$40,00022%
Preferential Primaries Action$35,0001n/a
Rank Mi Vote Ballot Question Committee$35,0001n/a
Iowa Democratic Party$25,0001n/a
FairVote Minnesota Foundation$25,00016%
Democratic Party of Hawaii$25,0001n/a
Alaska Democratic Party$25,0001n/a
FairVote Illinois Action$20,000147%
National Association of Nonpartisan Reformers$20,00029%
Oregon Ranked Choice Voting Advocates$13,00013%
Partners in Democracy Inc$12,00012%
Fair Elections Portland$11,0002n/a
Missouri Democratic State Committee$10,0001n/a
Better Elections for Santa Clara Yes on Measure A$10,000110%
Ranked Choice Voting for San Juan County$10,0001n/a
Yes on 117$10,00010%
Alaskans for Better Elections$10,00011%
Ranked Choice Voting for Texas$10,0001n/a
Progressive Humboldt Coalition$6,0001n/a
Coalition for DC Representation in Congress Education Fund$5,00011%
Rcv for Colorado Education Fund$4,0001n/a
Nevadans for Election$3,5001n/a
Voter Choice Albany$3,5001n/a
Committee for Ranked Choice Voting$1,5021n/a
Fix Democracy First Education Fund$1,0001n/a

Plus 1 recipient with no EIN on record ($20k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Fairvote Action supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 3 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 13 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPortlanders for Charter Reform: $75,000 over 1y, 8.6% of budgetCalifornia RCV Institute Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 31% of budgetCalifornia RCV Coalition Inc: $40,000 over 2y, 37% of budgetVermont Public Interest Research Group Inc: $40,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetFairVote Minnesota Foundation: $25,000 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetFairVote Illinois Action: $20,000 over 1y, 47% of budgetNational Association of Nonpartisan Reformers: $20,000 over 2y, 9.0% of budgetOregon Ranked Choice Voting Advocates: $13,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetPartners in Democracy Inc: $12,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetBetter Elections for Santa Clara Yes on Measure A: $10,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetYes on 117: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAlaskans for Better Elections: $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCoalition for DC Representation in Congress Education Fund: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 13.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Unite America IncCO13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Unite America Inc · Unite America Institute Inc · Article IV · Proteus Fund Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Fairvote Action with peer funders

About Fairvote Action

How much does Fairvote Action give?
Fairvote Action reported 7 grants totaling $443,000 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 10 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2023.
What does Fairvote Action fund?
By grant dollars over FY2018 to FY2024, its largest causes are Public Benefit (97%), Environment (3%), Civil Rights (0%).
Who are Fairvote Action's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2018 to FY2024: Ranked Choice Voting for Seattle ($390k), Make All Votes Count DC ($310k), Portlanders for Charter Reform ($75k).
Does Fairvote Action fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 75% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Fairvote Action?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Unite America Inc, Unite America Institute Inc, Article IV.
Where is Fairvote Action based?
Fairvote Action is based in MD.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Fairvote Action’s filings →

More from the funding graph