Skip to content

Virginia · Public charity

Article IV

Our mission is to advance policies that promote freedom and

$69M
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
49
Grants FY2024
27
Organizations funded FY2023
67%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$100,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$18,380,000
Organizations funded a year
2 to 27
FY2021 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
22

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 67% of the organizations Article IV funded were first-time grantees, receiving 67% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 33% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4.3M went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23
Civil RightsPublic BenefitHuman ServicesMembership BenefitEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving48$69M65%
FY202327$6.4M67%
FY202222$5.4M91%
FY20212$1.0Mn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Public Benefit$71MHealth$6.5MCivil Rights$3.2MSocial Science$478kEnvironment$300kHuman Services$250kPublic Safety & Disaster$187kCommunity Improvement$23k

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
VT
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
OH
CT
UT
NE
MO
VA
MD
NM
AR
DC
OK
MS
GA

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2021 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Vote Yes on 3$18,380,000164%
Montanans for Election Reform Action Fund$18,175,000180%
Citizens Not Politicians$10,700,000227%
Oregon Ranked Choice Votin$6,465,0001n/a
No on 2$4,900,000134%
Better Elections$4,812,9782n/a
Yes on 117$2,830,000171%
Idahoans for Open Primarie$2,220,0001n/a
Oregon Ranked Choice Voting Advocates$1,467,000267%
FairVote Minnesota$1,190,000284%
Show all 71 grantees
All grantees of Article IV by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Vote Yes on 3$18,380,000164%
Montanans for Election Reform Action Fund$18,175,000180%
Citizens Not Politicians$10,700,000227%
Oregon Ranked Choice Votin$6,465,0001n/a
No on 2$4,900,000134%
Better Elections$4,812,9782n/a
Yes on 117$2,830,000171%
Idahoans for Open Primarie$2,220,0001n/a
Oregon Ranked Choice Voting Advocates$1,467,000267%
FairVote Minnesota$1,190,000284%
Alaskans for Better Elections$1,015,000270%
One Person One Vote$850,00014%
Fairvote Action$815,000344%
Wyoming FREE$651,6682100%
Ballot Access Mississippi$607,7812n/a
Conservative Majority Fund$500,0001100%
Utah Ranked Choice Voting Action$400,000182%
Common Cause$368,30032%
Nebraskans for Better Governance$349,200260%
Joseph Rainey Center for Public Policy$343,000113%
North Dakota Citizens Protecting the Constitution$324,433131%
Vermont Public Interest Research Group Inc$275,000213%
Southern Nevada Building T$250,0001n/a
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People$250,0001n/a
Eternal Vigilance Action Inc$240,000234%
American Unity Fund Inc$200,00016%
United Conservative Policy Fund$200,000118%
Oklahoma United for Progress Inc$200,000132%
Fix the System-Wisconsin Action Inc$200,000276%
Ohio Progressive Collaborative Education Fund$200,00013%
Conservative Leadership for Missouri$200,000110%
Eternal Vigilance Action I$187,0001n/a
Nebraska Votes$185,00028%
Rank the Vote Ohio$170,0002n/a
Platte Institute for Economic Research Inc$158,00046%
Utah Ranked Choice Voting$157,000142%
Protect AR Constitution$150,000119%
Fairvote Washington$125,000313%
Equality State Policy Center$125,000227%
Veterans for All Voters$120,000113%
Common Cause Education Fund$110,00010%
House Majority Forward$100,00010%
Missouri Conservative Valu$100,0001n/a
Four for Montana Action Fund$80,0001100%
Center for Civic Design Inc$75,00023%
Votes Idaho Company$75,000217%
Representwomen Inc$67,00013%
Ranked Choice Voting Maryland$55,000187%
Fairvote$51,50021%
Win Minnesota$50,00012%
SAM Advocacy Fund$50,000117%
Count Mi Vote Education Fund$50,00011%
Count Mi Vote$50,00014%
4 Score 7$36,0281n/a
Upvote Virginia$36,000130%
New Progressive Network$35,00015%
Partners in Democracy Education Inc$35,0001n/a
Open Primaries Inc$33,60023%
Utahns Protecting our Constitution$27,337125%
Democracy a Journal of Ideas Inc$25,00015%
South Dakota Voters First$25,00013%
Sightline Institute$25,00011%
Conservative Accountability Project Inc$25,000166%
Wy Vote$25,0001n/a
New Mexico Black Leadership Council$20,00011%
Utahns for Responsive Government DBA Better Boundaries$20,00014%
Nm Native Vote$20,00014%
Equality New Mexico Foundation$20,00015%
Center for Civic Action$20,00011%
R Street Institute$15,00020%
League of Women Voters of Alaska$7,5001n/a

Where it is load-bearing

Article IV supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 23 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 58 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVote Yes on 3: $18,380,000 over 1y, 64% of budgetMontanans for Election Reform Action Fund: $18,175,000 over 1y, 80% of budgetCitizens Not Politicians: $10,700,000 over 2y, 27% of budgetNo on 2: $4,900,000 over 1y, 34% of budgetYes on 117: $2,830,000 over 1y, 71% of budgetOregon Ranked Choice Voting Advocates: $1,467,000 over 2y, 67% of budgetFairVote Minnesota: $1,190,000 over 2y, 84% of budgetAlaskans for Better Elections: $1,015,000 over 2y, 70% of budgetOne Person One Vote: $850,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetFairvote Action: $815,000 over 3y, 44% of budgetWyoming FREE: $651,668 over 2y, 100% of budgetConservative Majority Fund: $500,000 over 1y, 100% of budgetUtah Ranked Choice Voting Action: $400,000 over 1y, 82% of budgetCommon Cause: $368,300 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetNebraskans for Better Governance: $349,200 over 2y, 60% of budgetJoseph Rainey Center for Public Policy: $343,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetNorth Dakota Citizens Protecting the Constitution: $324,433 over 1y, 31% of budgetVermont Public Interest Research Group Inc: $275,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetEternal Vigilance Action Inc: $240,000 over 2y, 34% of budgetAmerican Unity Fund Inc: $200,000 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetUnited Conservative Policy Fund: $200,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetOklahoma United for Progress Inc: $200,000 over 1y, 32% of budgetFix the System-Wisconsin Action Inc: $200,000 over 2y, 76% of budgetOhio Progressive Collaborative Education Fund: $200,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetConservative Leadership for Missouri: $200,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetNebraska Votes: $185,000 over 2y, 8.1% of budgetPlatte Institute for Economic Research Inc: $158,000 over 4y, 6.4% of budgetUtah Ranked Choice Voting: $157,000 over 1y, 42% of budgetProtect AR Constitution: $150,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetFairvote Washington: $125,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetEquality State Policy Center: $125,000 over 2y, 27% of budgetVeterans for All Voters: $120,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetCommon Cause Education Fund: $110,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHouse Majority Forward: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFour for Montana Action Fund: $80,000 over 1y, 100% of budgetCenter for Civic Design Inc: $75,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetVotes Idaho Company: $75,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetRepresentwomen Inc: $67,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetRanked Choice Voting Maryland: $55,000 over 1y, 87% of budgetFairvote: $51,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetWin Minnesota: $50,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetSAM Advocacy Fund: $50,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetCount Mi Vote Education Fund: $50,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetCount Mi Vote: $50,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetUpvote Virginia: $36,000 over 1y, 30% of budgetNew Progressive Network: $35,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetOpen Primaries Inc: $33,600 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetUtahns Protecting our Constitution: $27,337 over 1y, 25% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 58.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Unite America IncCO36.8× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Unite America Inc · Sixteen Thirty Fund · Unite America Institute Inc · New Venture Fund · Democracy Fund Voice Inc · Action Now Inc · America Votes · Hopewell Fund · Our American Future Action · Democracy Fund Inc · Tides Foundation · Final-Five Fund Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Article IV with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Article IV?

Find your warmest path to Article IV through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Article IV

How much does Article IV give?
Article IV reported 49 grants totaling $69,263,050 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 2 and 27 organizations a year over FY2021 to FY2023.
What does Article IV fund?
By grant dollars over FY2021 to FY2024, its largest causes are Public Benefit (87%), Health (8%), Civil Rights (4%).
Who are Article IV's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2021 to FY2024: Vote Yes on 3 ($18M), Montanans for Election Reform Action Fund ($18M), Citizens Not Politicians ($11M).
Does Article IV fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 67% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Article IV?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Unite America Inc, Sixteen Thirty Fund, Unite America Institute Inc.
Where is Article IV based?
Article IV is based in VA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 71 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $227k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Article IV’s filings →

More from the funding graph