Skip to content

· Private foundation

Fabick Charitable Trust Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$14k
Granted FY2022
3
Grants FY2022
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Religion$618kHealth$291kInternational$222kPublic Safety & Disaster$186kEducation$157kYouth Development$151kHuman Services$119kAnimals$113kOther$0
02FY2022 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k2 grants · $4k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
St Vincent de Paul$10,000
Boys and Girls Club of Greater Milwaukee$2,500
Missouri Right to Life$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%St Vincent de Paul Society (Milwaukee): $10k → 17%Guardian Angels Settlement Association: $3k → 21%Guardian Angels Settlement Association: $3k → 21%Hope House: $300 → 21%Catholic Charities of St Louis: $5k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
MI
NY
CA
CO
MO
VA
TN
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 47 repeat orgs$701k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +103% since the first grant, against +45% for those funded once.

47 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2022, 45 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

47
53

Total granted

$1.5M
$698k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+103%
+45%

Still filing today

17%
28%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
Human ServicesHealthPhilanthropyEducationHousing & ShelterInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SL
    St Louis Police Foundation
    4× · 2017–2021 · $186k · revenue +61%
  • SP
    ST PATRICK CENTER
    5× · 2017–2021 · $45k · revenue +26%
  • RA
    ROOM AT THE INN
    4× · 2017–2020 · $33k · revenue +220%

Funded once

  • CG
    CARDINAL GLENNON CHILDRENS HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2017 · $135k
  • GS
    GREATER ST LOUIS COUNCIL- BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA
    one grant, 2017 · $110k
  • MT
    MASTERS TOURNAMENT FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $100k · revenue +83%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Patrick Partnership Center

To transform lives through sustainable housing, employment and healthcare, following the compassion of jesus.

—
2
Queen of Peace Center

The mission of queen of peace center is to bring the healing, help, and hope of jesus christ to those in need with a compassionate caring presence. our purpose is to provide family-centered care for individuals with substance-use…

Health
3
Sts Joachim and Ann Care Service

To provide integrated services such as financial assistance, case management, and referrals to families and individuals of all ages to reduce the propensity for homelessness, abuse and neglect, and to provide the tools to achieve…

—
4
St Patrick Apartments Inc

Inspired by jesus christ, st patrick apartments, inc. assists cardinal ritter senior services in providing compassionate care through a continuum of high quality residential healthcare and supportive social services. we bring the mission…

—
5
Catholic Charities of Kansas City - St Joseph Inc

Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us

Human Services
6
Magdala House

To provide outpatient and residential rehabilitative services to individuals and families referred by various government agencies. these individuals include substance abusers, intellectually disabled, developmentally disabled, and abused…

Health
7
Saint Louis Counseling Inc

The mission of saint louis counseling is to bring the healing, help, and hope of jesus christ to those in need with a compassionate caring presence. the purpose of saint louis counseling is "guided by the teachings of jesus christ, saint…

—
8
St Martha's Hall

Saint martha's purpose is to serve women and children impacted by domestic violence by providing shelter and services.

Human Services
9
Nazareth Living Center

In the tradition of the sisters of st. joseph of carondelet and in partnership with benedictine, nazareth living center participates in the healing ministry of jesus ministering with compassion and responding creatively to the needs of…

Health
10
Mission St Louis

Mission: st. louis empowers individuals for social and economic growth through relationships and opportunity.

Community Improvement
11
Benedictine Living Community of St Peter

Benedictine living community - st. peter is a catholic organization entrusted with advancing the health care ministry of the benedictine sisters of duluth, minnesota. our mission is to witness to god's love by providing compassionate,…

—
12
Living Community of St Joseph

We are a catholic, faith-based organization entrusted with advancing the life-enhancing senior care ministry of the benedictine sisters of duluth, minnesota. we witness to god's love by creating inclusive communities, supporting those we…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Patrick Center; the most unlike its peers is Masters Tournament Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 101 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
19/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CARDINAL GLENNON CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $135,000 · OtherCARDINAL GLENNON CHILDRENS HOSPITALGREATER ST LOUIS COUNCIL- BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $110,000 · OtherGREATER ST LOUIS COUNCIL- BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICASegs 4 Vets: $110,000 · OtherSegs 4 VetsARCHDIOCESE OF ST LOUIS: $91,000 · OtherARCHDIOCESE OF ST LOUISChristian Brothers College High School: $73,500 · OtherSt Vincent de Paul: $55,000 · Other+81 more: $958,410 · Other+81 moreWINGS OF HOPE: $222,000 · InternationalWINGS OF HO…St Louis Police Foundation: $185,500 · Public Safety & DisasterSt Louis …MASTERS TOURNAMENT FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 · Philanthropy+2 more: $4,500 · PhilanthropyST LOUIS UNIVERSITY: $50,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EducationST AUGUSTINE PREPARATORY ACADEMY INC: $5,000 · EducationROOM AT THE INN: $33,000 · Housing & ShelterPETER & PAUL COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $12,300 · Housing & ShelterST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY OF MILWAUKEE: $10,000 · Human ServicesGUARDIAN ANGEL SETTLEMENT ASSOCIATION: $6,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF ST LOUIS: $5,000 · Human Services+1 more: $300 · Human Services
Other$1,532,910International$222,000Public Safety & Disaster$185,500Philanthropy$104,500Education$60,000Housing & Shelter$45,300Human Services$21,300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWINGS OF HOPE: $222,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetSt Louis Police Foundation: $185,500 over 4y, 4.2% of budgetST LOUIS UNIVERSITY: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST PATRICK CENTER: $45,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetROOM AT THE INN: $33,000 over 4y, 6.1% of budgetPETER & PAUL COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $12,300 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY OF MILWAUKEE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMISSOURI RIGHT TO LIFE: $7,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetGUARDIAN ANGEL SETTLEMENT ASSOCIATION: $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTARKLOFF DISABILITY INSTITUTE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetOUR LITTLE HAVEN: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF ST LOUIS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDelta Gamma Center for Children with Vis: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetST AUGUSTINE PREPARATORY ACADEMY INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRoman Catholic Archdiocese Of Nassau FOUNDATION INC (RCAN FOUNDATION): $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLegatus of St Louis: $3,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetMOTHER OF GOOD COUNSEL HOME: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MILWAUKEE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD BIRD SANCTUARY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE HOUSE INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WINGS OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds St Louis Police Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MASTERS TOURNAMENT FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ST PATRICK CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ROOM AT THE INN ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Louis Community Foundation IncMO26.3× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · St Louis Community Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Ross Family Foundation · Roman Catholic Foundation of Eastern Missouri · World Wide Technology Foundation · Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company · The Shaughnessy Family Foundation · The Theodore a Kienstra Foundation · Vincent E and Mary Judith Shaw Family Foundation · Vatterott Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fabick Charitable Trust Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fabick Charitable Trust Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Fabick Charitable Trust Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Fabick Charitable Trust Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 101 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Fabick’s filings →

    More from the funding graph