Skip to content

· Public charity

Experimental Aircraft Association Inc

Experimental aircraft association, inc.

$1.7M
Granted FY2022
2
Grants FY2022
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2022.

Arts & Culture$1.2MEducation$106kScience & Tech$80kCommunity Improvement$50kRecreation & Sports$45kPublic Safety & Disaster$36kYouth Development$28kPhilanthropy$11k
02FY2022 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $60,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,748,213 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,688,213 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2022

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$50,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$92M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FLYONSPEED INC$50,000
FOALE AEROSPACE INC$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 91% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FLYING 12 CLUB LLC: $10k → 7%GNOSS FIELD FLYING CLUB INC: $10k → 8%FOALE AEROSPACE INC: $10k → 16%NBAA: $50k → 14%FLYONSPEED INC: $50k → 8%AVIATION EXPLORATION BASE: $14k → 10%EAA AVIATION FOUNDATION INC: $110k → 11%AIR LINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION INTERNATIONAL: $10k → 6%FLYONSPEED INCORPORATED: $25k → 8%AVIATION EXPLORATION BASE: $13k → 10%EAA VINTAGE AIRCRAFT ASSOCIATION INC: $76k → 11%REMORA SYSTEMS INC: $25k → 6%CITY OF OSHKOSH FIRE DEPARTMENT: $11k → 11%THE STAN LEE FOUNDATION: $10k → 6%OSHKOSH AREA UNITED WAY: $11k → 11%EAA AVIATION FOUNDATION INC: $1.1M → 11%EAA VINTAGE AIRCRAFT ASSOCIATION INC: $30k → 11%EAA WARBIRDS OF AMERICA INC: $15k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 4 repeat orgs$172k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2022, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
10

Total granted

$1.4M
$162k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+40%

Still filing today

75%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22
Arts & CultureYouth DevelopmentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EA
    EAA AVIATION FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2019–2021 · $1.2M · revenue +139%
  • EV
    EAA VINTAGE AIRCRAFT ASSOCIATION INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $106k · revenue +27%
  • AE
    AVIATION EXPLORATION BASE INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $28k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • NB
    NATIONAL BUSINESS AVIATION ASSOCIATION INC
    one grant, 2018 · $50k · revenue -9%
  • RS
    REMORA SYSTEMS INC
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
  • EW
    EAA WARBIRDS OF AMERICA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue +40%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Air Transport Association of America Inc

Airlines for america (a4a) vigorously advocates for america's airlines as models of safety, customer service, and environmental responsibility; and as the indispensable network that drives our nation's economy and global…

—
2
Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association

See schedule oaircraft owners & pilots association (aopa), a not-for-profit individual membership organization, effectively serves the interests and needs of its members and establishes, maintains, and articulates position of leadership to…

—
3
United Airlines Pilot Disability Veba Trust

Provide disability income continuation benefit to united airlines, inc pilots

Membership Benefit
4
Experimental Aircraft Association Inc

Experimental aircraft association, inc. is dedicated to growing aviation through participation and education. we strive to deliver educational offerings and activities which guide new participants and reduce barriers to participation. eaa…

Science & Tech
5
Independent Pilots Association

The Independent Pilots Association (IPA) is the collective bargaining agent for the pilots employed by United Parcel Service. The IPA negotiates and submits to its members contracts for ratification and acts in the interest of its members.

—
6
National Aeronautic Association Inc

To advance the art, sport, and science of aviation and space flight by fostering opportunities to participate fully in the aviation activities and by promoting public understanding of the importance of aviation and space flight in the…

—
7
Aircraft Electronics Association

To encourage and advance the science of aircraft electronics.

—
8
National Association of Flight Instructors
Education
9
The Aopa Foundation Inc

See schedule oto promote, advance and encourage aviation and airport safety and security and the research and testing in the support thereof; to educate the public and users of the national air transportation system to the value and…

Public Safety & Disaster
10
Air Traffic Control Association Inc

The association is a non-profit corporation organized for the purpose of promoting, maintaining and enhancing the stature and wellbeing of the air traffic control profession and the aviation community. the association is dedicated to…

—
11
Aviation Workforce Alliance

The primary purpose of the aviation workforce alliance is to bring national awareness to the workforce shortage facing the airline industry and to identify, describe, advocate for, and help implement solutions to the shortage

—
12
United Airlines Pilots Retirement Foundation
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Eaa Warbirds of America Inc; the most unlike its peers is Father Carrs Place 2-B Ltd. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EAA AVIATION FOUNDATION INC: $1,216,172 · Arts & CultureEAA AVIATION FOUNDATION INC+1 more: $15,000 · Arts & CultureFLYONSPEED INCORPORATED: $75,000 · OtherFLYONSPEED INCOR…NATIONAL BUSINESS AVIATION ASSOCIATION INC: $50,000 · OtherNATIONAL BUSINES…REMORA SYSTEMS INC: $25,000 · OtherREMORA SYSTEMS I…OSHKOSH AREA UNITED WAY INC: $11,000 · OtherCITY OF OSHKOSH FIRE DEPARTMENT: $11,000 · OtherPAYSON AERO CLUB LLC: $10,000 · OtherGNOSS FIELD FLYING CLUB INC: $10,000 · OtherTHE STAN LEE FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherFLYING 12 CLUB LLC: $10,000 · OtherFOALE AEROSPACE INC: $10,000 · OtherAIR LINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION INTERNATIONAL: $10,000 · OtherEAA VINTAGE AIRCRAFT ASSOCIATION INC: $106,315 · EducationAVIATION EXPLORATION BASE INC: $27,907 · Youth Development
Arts & Culture$1,231,172Other$232,000Education$106,315Youth Development$27,907

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEAA AVIATION FOUNDATION INC: $1,216,172 over 2y, 20% of budgetEAA VINTAGE AIRCRAFT ASSOCIATION INC: $106,315 over 2y, 14% of budgetNATIONAL BUSINESS AVIATION ASSOCIATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAVIATION EXPLORATION BASE INC: $27,907 over 2y, 24% of budgetEAA WARBIRDS OF AMERICA INC: $15,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetOSHKOSH AREA UNITED WAY INC: $11,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetAIR LINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION INTERNATIONAL: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Experimental Aircraft Association Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Experimental Aircraft Association Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $2.1M of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Experimental Aircraft Association’s filings →

    More from the funding graph