How much did EVERETT W ERDOESY & GRETHA M grant in FY2025?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 78% of EVERETT W ERDOESY & GRETHA M’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

—

2020

—

2021

—

2022

motherscatholic

2023

mothersgirls

2024

mothers

2025

mothers

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k4 grants · $21k
$10k–50k3 grants · $85k

$6,500

Median grant

States reached

$1.8M

Total assets

Largest grants

NC VETERINARY MEDICAL FOUNDATION$35,000
MOTHERS HELPNG MOTHERS$25,000
GIRLS INC OF SARASOTA$25,000
PINE VIEW SCHOOL$6,500
MARIE SELBY GARDENS$6,500
OPERATION PATRIOT SUPPORT$5,000
HARVEST HOUSE$2,500

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9% — the area typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$609k · 13 repeat orgs$120k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$609k

$102k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%

+96%

Still filing today

38%

60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EducationHealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentAnimalsFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

ALL FAITHS FOOD BANK
4× · 2020–2024 · $28k · revenue +150%
RH
RESURRECTION HOUSE
2× · 2020–2021 · $25k · revenue +11%
BUILDON INC
2× · 2020–2023 · $9k · revenue +39%

Funded once

BP
BAY PARK CONSERVANCYgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +2817%
CF
CONSERVATION FOUNDATION GULF COAST
one grant, 2019 · $10k
CF
CONSERVATION FOUNDATION
one grant, 2021 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

The Florida Center for Early Childhood

The florida center supports the healthy development of young children, specializing in those with delays, disabilities or mental health challenges. our mission- "to help build and foster strong families and expand the potential of young…

Human Services

Pines of Sarasota Foundation Inc

Pines of sarasota foundation secures funding to provide compassionate care, vital resources, and financial assistance for the seniors, children, and the nursing community serving them.

Health

Forty Carrots of Sarasota Inc

Forty carrots family center's mission is to nurture healthy child and family development through research-based, relationship-centered education and mental health services.

—

Lightshare Behavioral Wellness & Recovery Inc

First Step of Sarasota Inc prevents and treats alcohol and drug addictions and associated disorders. We foster fully functionong, productive individuals by offering a full array of services in partnership with our community.

Health

The Family Healthcare Foundation Inc

Ensuring access to high-quality healthcare for all in the tampa bay area.

Health

Children's Case Management Organization

Families first of palm beach county's mission is empowering families of all histories and challenges to grow strong in every way. strong empowered families create healthy, resilient homes and communities for generations to come.

Environment

Sarasota City Foundation Inc

Philanthropy

The Hospice Foundation of the Florida Suncoast Inc

Raises and distributes funds in support of empath health, inc. and its family of programs.

—

Better Together Strengthening

Empowering people through better families and better jobs.

Human Services

Bioflorida Inc

Bioflorida is the voice of florida's life sciences industry, representing 8,600 establishments and research organizations in the biopharmaceutical, medical technology, and digital health sectors that collectively employ 107,000 floridians.

—

Florida's Children First Inc

Organization mission: florida's children first is a non-profit, nonpartisan, independent advocacy organization committed to protecting and advancing the rights of children and youth impacted by the child welfare, juvenile justice, and…

Human Services

The Hospice of the Florida Suncoast Inc

Provides health, human, & community services for the terminally ill and their families.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Girls Incorporated and the most unlike its peers is Operation Patriot Support Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

18 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

18/18

Grantees still filing

15/18

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$587,800Human Services$49,750Food & Nutrition$27,500Community Improvement$25,000Health$15,000Education$15,000Youth Development$9,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Sarasota CoFL23.8× affinity9 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Sarasota Co · Gulf Coast Community Foundation Inc · Charles & Margery Barancik Foundation Inc · Rita B Lamere Memorial Foundation · The Tillie Jennie & Harold Schwartz · William G and Marie Selby · Sisterhood For Good Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation EVERETT W ERDOESY & GRETHA M funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

13get no government money at all

1rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: MANASOTA BUDS.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

4 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 223871903 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on MANASOTA BUDS, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 5% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Everett W Erdoesy & Gretha M?

Find your warmest path to Everett W Erdoesy & Gretha M through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

EVERETT W ERDOESY & GRETHA M

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

18 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Everett W Erdoesy & Gretha M?

More from the funding graph

EVERETT W ERDOESY & GRETHA M

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

18 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Everett W Erdoesy & Gretha M?

More from the funding graph