Skip to content

· Private foundation

Everett Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$36k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$153kEducation$100kCrime & Legal$42kYouth Development$15kPhilanthropy$15kHuman Services$12kRecreation & Sports$10kFood & Nutrition$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $25k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$729k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Families Against Mandatory Minimums$15,000
First Baptist Church$10,000
Arkansas Baptist Children & Family Ministries$5,000
Immerse of Arkansas$5,000
Street Ministry Luke 958$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Street Ministry Luke 958: $1k → 10%Immerse of Arkansas: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$223k · 8 repeat orgs$154k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
8

Total granted

$223k
$128k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+6%

Still filing today

13%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 28% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionEducationYouth DevelopmentHealthReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FB
    FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH
    4× · 2020–2025 · $123k
  • FF
    FAMM - FAMILIES FOR JUSTICE REFORM
    2× · 2023–2024 · $27k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    3× · 2020–2023 · $16k

Funded once

  • OB
    OUACHITA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue +12%
  • F
    FAMM
    one grant, 2021 · $12k
  • J3
    JOHN 316 MINISTRIES INC
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue -24%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Freedom in Christ Ministries

To provide resources, training, and continuing support to leaders in the us and around the world in order that they may help others find freedom in christ.

Religion
2
Base Ministry

We are a religious training organization that develops leaders who live out God's word, share the Gospel of Jesus, and actively serve His church in their local communities around the world.

Youth Development
3
Audio Scripture Ministries

Asm's commitment to the great commission leads us to serve others by:-partnering with national leaders, churches, ministries, and individuals to create and distribute scripture media to share the good news of jesus.-recording bible and…

—
4
Asbury Theological Seminary

Asbury Theological Seminary is a community called to prepare theologically educated, sanctified, Spirit-filled men and women to evangelize and to spread scriptural holiness throughout the world through the love of Jesus Christ, in the…

Education
5
Apt Ministries

To train pastors/leaders in africa who have little or no formal training and resources. teach them how to study and prepare bible-based messages using the thompson chain reference study bible and to provide bible to trained pastors/leaders.

Religion
6
Face to Faith Ministry

Our mission is to make disciples of jesus christ by engaging indigenous pastors around the world. our vision is to train pastors and their congregants to share the gospel in a friendly, non-denominational approach across all ethnicities,…

Religion
7
University of the Ozarks

True to our christian heritage, we prepare students from diverse religious, cultural, educational and economic backgrounds to live life fully.

Education
8
Reach Out Ministries Inc

Spiritual awakening and training youth leaders.

Religion
9
Coalition for Christian Outreach

The cco (coalition for christian outreach) is an interdenominational campus ministry organization with a mission of "transforming college students to transform the world." the cco is supported primarily through donor contributions and…

—
10
Entrust

Entrust's mission is to multiply church leaders through accessible, locally owned, reproducible training systems. this is accomplished through facilitated learning, assisting christians in gaining solid understanding of scripture, and…

—
11
The a Partners Dba the Antioch Partners

To send out followers of jesus to participate in god's mission in the world. we are committed to inviting people to follow jesus, social justice and establishing worshipping communities among unreached and least-reached peoples throughout…

Religion
12
Lou Engle Ministries

Advancing the kingdom of god through prayer,preaching and teaching.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fellowship of Christian Athletes; the most unlike its peers is Street Ministry Luke 9 58. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH: $123,000 · OtherFIRST BAPTIST CHURCHFAMM - FAMILIES FOR JUSTICE REFORM: $27,000 · OtherFAMM - FAMILIES FOR JUSTICE REFORMIndividual grant recipient: $16,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientOUACHITA CORNERSTONE FUND: $15,000 · OtherOUACHITA CORNERSTONE FUNDFAMILIES AGAINST MANDATORY MINIMUMS: $15,000 · OtherFAMILIES AGAINST MANDATORY MINIMUMSFAMM: $12,000 · OtherArkansas Baptist Children's Homes: $12,000 · OtherCHURCH AT BENTON: $10,000 · OtherSECOND CHANCE YOUTH RANCH: $10,000 · Other+4 more: $10,000 · OtherOUACHITA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $100,000 · EducationOUACHITA BAPTIST UNIVERSITYFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentIMMERSE ARKANSAS: $5,000 · Human ServicesSTREET MINISTRY LUKE 9 58: $1,000 · Human ServicesJOHN 316 MINISTRIES INC: $5,000 · HealthLAUNCH GLOBAL: $5,000 · ReligionARKANSAS FOODBANK: $1,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$250,000Education$100,000Youth Development$10,000Human Services$6,000Health$5,000Religion$5,000Food & Nutrition$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOUACHITA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILIES AGAINST MANDATORY MINIMUMS: $15,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJOHN 316 MINISTRIES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLAUNCH GLOBAL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetARKANSAS FOODBANK: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OUACHITA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds FAMILIES AGAINST MANDATORY MINIMUMS ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds IMMERSE ARKANSAS ↗
  • Who funds JOHN 316 MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds LAUNCH GLOBAL ↗
  • Who funds STREET MINISTRY LUKE 9 58 ↗
  • Who funds ARKANSAS FOODBANK ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arkansas Community Foundation IncAR13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arkansas Community Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Everett Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Everett Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Everett Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph