Skip to content
Everett Co-Operative Bank Charitable Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Everett Co-Operative Bank Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$113k
Granted FY2025still arriving
38
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Health$117kRecreation & Sports$39kYouth Development$30kFood & Nutrition$25kReligion$23kCommunity Improvement$21kHuman Services$13kArts & Culture$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 38 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k34 grants · $63k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $50k
$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$4.7M
Total assets

Anchored by a single position: about 97% of reported assets are held in Ecbk.

Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE COMMUNITY FAMILY$15,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF METRO NORTH$15,000
SISTERS OF ST JOSEPH$10,000
E CLUB OF EVERETT$10,000
COPS FOR KIDS WITH CANCER$7,500
MYSTIC VALLEY ELDER SERVICES$5,000
THE FOOD DRIVE$5,000
THINK OF MICHAELSEE THE GOOD$5,000
JOINT COMMITTEE FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE$5,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF DORCHESTER$2,500
MYSTIC VALLEY YMCA$2,500
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC$2,500
NORTHEAST ARC$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $47k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%THE COMMUNITY FAMILY: $15k → 16%THINK OF MICHAEL INC: $5k → 10%COMMUNITY SERVINGS: $10k → 16%MYSTIC VALLEY ELDER SERVICES: $5k → 8%BADASS WALTHAM WARRIORS: $500 → 8%NUPATH INC: $10k → 8%CONNORS KINDNESS PROJECT: $500 → 8%SECOND CHANCES: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

35%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$155k · 13 repeat orgs$284k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 25 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
14

Total granted

$155k
$216k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+2%
+19%

Still filing today

62%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $68k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesPhilanthropyHealthYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TI
    TEAM IMPACT INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $20k · revenue +26%
  • NORTHEAST ARC INC
    2× · 2023–2025 · $15k · revenue +24%
  • TF
    THE FOOD DRIVE INC
    2× · 2023–2025 · $15k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $136k
  • JL
    JAMES L MCKEOWN BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF WOBURN INC
    one grant, 2023 · $12k · revenue +23%
  • SJ
    ST JUDE'S CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
North Suffolk Community Services Inc

North suffolk community services supports individuals and families across the lifespan in their pursuit of independence and stability by providing a comprehensive array of treatment and recovery services. our approach is to intervene as…

—
2
Ocean State Cancer Crushers
—
3
Mab Community Services Inc

Mission empowering people with disabilities to live meaningful, self-directed lives through innovative programs that foster independence, resilience, and community. vision building on our legacy of advocacy, innovation and service, we seek…

Health
4
Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Boston Inc

The ymca of greater boston is dedicated to improving the health of mind, body, and spirit of individuals and families in our communities. we promote welcoming, belonging, and opportunity for all.

Human Services
5
Melmark New England Inc

Melmark new england, is a multi state human services provider with premier private special education schools, professional development, training, and research centers. melmark new england is committed to enhancing the lives of individuals…

Education
6
Boys & Girls Clubs of Boston Inc

Boys & girls clubs of boston (bgcb) stands as a transformative force in boston and chelsea, where high expectations unlock greatness. we believe that every young person who walks through our doors carries limitless potential. through our…

Youth Development
7
Mass General Brigham Incorporated

Patient care, teaching, research and serving the community.

Health
8
Old Colony Young Men's Christian Association Inc

Old colony ymca helps children, families, and individuals develop to their fullest potential. we respond to ever-changing community needs and view our services through three lenses: youth development, healthy living, and social…

Human Services
9
New England Community Project Inc

Necp believes that social change happens when those most impacted by issues of systemic injustice, organize at the block level to address issues within their neighborhoods. through their involvement at a community level, residents engage…

Community Improvement
10
Brookline Teen Center

Btc's vision is for all brookline students to engage in their community and emerge ready for college, career, and beyond. our mission is to provide a platform where all teens can explore, create, and discover who they are. through…

Youth Development
11
Viability Inc

Viability's mission is to build a world in which individuals with disabilities and other disadvantages realize acceptance, inclusion, and access.

Employment
12
Boston Foundation
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mystic Valley Aging Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is James L Mckeown Boys and Girls Club of Woburn Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/32
Grantees still filing
13/32
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $136,300 · OtherIndividual grant recipientE CLUB OF EVERETT INC: $35,000 · OtherE CLUB OF EVERETT INCNORTHEAST ARC INC: $15,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF METRO NORTH: $15,000 · OtherCOUNCIL OF SOCIAL CONERN INC: $10,500 · Other+23 more: $91,649 · Other+23 moreTHE COMMUNITY FAMILY INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesTHE COMMUNIT…NUPATH INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesNUPATH INCCOMMUNITY SERVINGS INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY SE…THINK OF MICHAEL: $5,000 · Human ServicesTHINK OF MIC…MYSTIC VALLEY AGING SERVICES INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesMYSTIC VALLE…+3 more: $2,000 · Human ServicesTEAM IMPACT INC: $20,000 · PhilanthropyTEAM IMPACT…COPS FOR KIDS WITH CANCER INC: $17,500 · PhilanthropyCOPS FOR KI…JEWISH BIG BROTHER & BIG SISTER ASSOCIATION OF GREATER BOSTON: $2,500 · PhilanthropyJEWISH BIG …THE MICHAEL DUNLEAVY FOUNDATION INC: $2,200 · PhilanthropyLYNNFIELD ROTARY CHARITABLE FUND INC: $1,700 · Philanthropy+2 more: $2,000 · PhilanthropyJAMES L MCKEOWN BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF WOBURN INC: $12,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF DORCHESTER INC: $2,500 · Youth DevelopmentLynnfield Youth Soccer Club: $850 · Youth DevelopmentTHE FOOD DRIVE INC: $15,000 · Food & NutritionST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $2,500 · HealthTANNER TA TA FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 · HealthROCK THE SPECTRUM CORPORATION CO THE SPECTRUM FOUNDATION: $1,750 · HealthELIOT COMMUNITY HUMAN SERVICES INC: $1,000 · HealthJOE ANDRUZZI FOUNDATION INC: $525 · HealthARTS FOR EVERETT INC: $5,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$303,449Human Services$47,000Philanthropy$45,900Youth Development$15,350Food & Nutrition$15,000Health$8,275Arts & Culture$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetE CLUB OF EVERETT INC: $35,000 over 2y, 37% of budgetTEAM IMPACT INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCOPS FOR KIDS WITH CANCER INC: $17,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetNORTHEAST ARC INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOOD DRIVE INC: $15,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetJAMES L MCKEOWN BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF WOBURN INC: $12,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNUPATH INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY SERVINGS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHINK OF MICHAEL: $5,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetTRIANGLE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMYSTIC VALLEY AGING SERVICES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARTS FOR EVERETT INC: $5,000 over 2y, 6.9% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF DORCHESTER INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH BIG BROTHER & BIG SISTER ASSOCIATION OF GREATER BOSTON: $2,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MICHAEL DUNLEAVY FOUNDATION INC: $2,200 over 1y, 46% of budgetROCK THE SPECTRUM CORPORATION CO THE SPECTRUM FOUNDATION: $1,750 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetLYNNFIELD ROTARY CHARITABLE FUND INC: $1,700 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetBoston Foundation Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetORANGE FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetSecond Chances Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMIDDLESEX COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION C/O JACKSON CHEGE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetELIOT COMMUNITY HUMAN SERVICES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLynnfield Youth Soccer Club: $850 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLYNNFIELD PIONEER FOOTBALL CLUB INC: $750 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetBadass Waltham Warriors Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCONNOR'S KINDNESS PROJECT INC: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetKWONG KOW CHINESE SCHOOL INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Salem Five Charitable…Eastern Bank Foundati…Cummings Foundation G…Cambridge Savings Cha…Aaf Charitable Founda…Rockland Trust Charit…Arbella Insurance Fou…Boston Foundation IncCitizens Charitable F…Everett Citizens Foun…Stoneham Charitable F…Dante Dieso Foundatio…
Salem Five Charitable Foundation IncMA29.7× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Salem Five Charitable Foundation Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Cambridge Savings Charitable Foundation Inc · Aaf Charitable Foundation · Rockland Trust Charitable Foundation Inc · Arbella Insurance Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · Citizens Charitable Foundation · Everett Citizens Foundation Inc · Stoneham Charitable Foundation Inc · Dante Dieso Foundation Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Everett Co-Operative Bank Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Everett Co-Operative Bank Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 150%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Triangle Inc: 90% of income from government
  • Nupath Inc: 84% of income from government
  • Northeast Arc Inc: 73% of income from government
  • The Community Family Inc: 41% of income from government
  • Community Servings Inc: 12% of income from government
  • Boys & Girls Clubs of Dorchester Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Arts for Everett Inc: 5% of income from government
  • The Food Drive Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Kwong Kow Chinese School Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Boston Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
15get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
3rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Everett Co-Operative Bank’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home