· Private foundation
Everett Co-Operative Bank Charitable Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 68% of EVERETT CO-OPERATIVE BANK CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k34 grants · $63k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $50k
Anchored by a single position — about 97% of reported assets are held in Ecbk.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE COMMUNITY FAMILY | $15,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF METRO NORTH | $15,000 |
| SISTERS OF ST JOSEPH | $10,000 |
| E CLUB OF EVERETT | $10,000 |
| COPS FOR KIDS WITH CANCER | $7,500 |
| JOINT COMMITTEE FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE | $5,000 |
| MYSTIC VALLEY ELDER SERVICES | $5,000 |
| THE FOOD DRIVE | $5,000 |
| THINK OF MICHAELSEE THE GOOD | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,000 |
| MYSTIC VALLEY YMCA | $2,500 |
| ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC | $2,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,500 |
| ARTS FOR EVERETT INC | $2,500 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF DORCHESTER | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $47k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
13 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 25 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $68k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TITEAM IMPACT INC2× · 2022–2023 · $20k · revenue +26%
NORTHEAST ARC INC2× · 2023–2025 · $15k · revenue +24%- TFTHE FOOD DRIVE INC2× · 2023–2025 · $15k · revenue +1%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2024 · $136k
- JLJAMES L MCKEOWN BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF WOBURN INCone grant, 2023 · $12k · revenue +23%
- SJST JUDE'S CHILDREN'S HOSPITALone grant, 2022 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
North suffolk community services supports individuals and families across the lifespan in their pursuit of independence and stability by providing a comprehensive array of treatment and recovery services. our approach is to intervene as…
Mission empowering people with disabilities to live meaningful, self-directed lives through innovative programs that foster independence, resilience, and community. vision building on our legacy of advocacy, innovation and service, we seek…
The ymca of greater boston is dedicated to improving the health of mind, body, and spirit of individuals and families in our communities. we promote welcoming, belonging, and opportunity for all.
Melmark new england, is a multi state human services provider with premier private special education schools, professional development, training, and research centers. melmark new england is committed to enhancing the lives of individuals…
Boys & girls clubs of boston (bgcb) stands as a transformative force in boston and chelsea, where high expectations unlock greatness. we believe that every young person who walks through our doors carries limitless potential. through our…
Patient care, teaching, research and serving the community.
Old colony ymca helps children, families, and individuals develop to their fullest potential. we respond to ever-changing community needs and view our services through three lenses: youth development, healthy living, and social…
Necp believes that social change happens when those most impacted by issues of systemic injustice, organize at the block level to address issues within their neighborhoods. through their involvement at a community level, residents engage…
Btc's vision is for all brookline students to engage in their community and emerge ready for college, career, and beyond. our mission is to provide a platform where all teens can explore, create, and discover who they are. through…
Viability's mission is to build a world in which individuals with disabilities and other disadvantages realize acceptance, inclusion, and access.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mystic Valley Aging Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is James L Mckeown Boys and Girls Club of Woburn Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 21 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 18% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds E CLUB OF EVERETT INC ↗
- Who funds TEAM IMPACT INC ↗
- Who funds COPS FOR KIDS WITH CANCER INC ↗
- Who funds THE COMMUNITY FAMILY INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHEAST ARC INC ↗
- Who funds THE FOOD DRIVE INC ↗
- Who funds JAMES L MCKEOWN BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF WOBURN INC ↗
- Who funds NUPATH INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY SERVINGS INC ↗
- Who funds THINK OF MICHAEL ↗
- Who funds MYSTIC VALLEY AGING SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds ARTS FOR EVERETT INC ↗
- Who funds TRIANGLE INC ↗
- Who funds TANNER TA TA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH BIG BROTHER & BIG SISTER ASSOCIATION OF GREATER BOSTON ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF DORCHESTER INC ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds THE MICHAEL DUNLEAVY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ROCK THE SPECTRUM CORPORATION CO THE SPECTRUM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LYNNFIELD ROTARY CHARITABLE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds ELIOT COMMUNITY HUMAN SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds MIDDLESEX COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION C/O JACKSON CHEGE ↗
- Who funds Boston Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds ORANGE FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Salem Five Charitable Foundation Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Cambridge Savings Charitable Foundation Inc · Aaf Charitable Foundation · Rockland Trust Charitable Foundation Inc · Arbella Insurance Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · Citizens Charitable Foundation · Everett Citizens Foundation Inc · Stoneham Charitable Foundation Inc · Dante Dieso Foundation Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Everett Co-Operative Bank Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Triangle Inc — 90% of income from government
- Nupath Inc — 84% of income from government
- Northeast Arc Inc — 73% of income from government
- The Community Family Inc — 41% of income from government
- Community Servings Inc — 12% of income from government
- Boys & Girls Clubs of Dorchester Inc — 7% of income from government
- Arts for Everett Inc — 5% of income from government
- The Food Drive Inc — 1% of income from government
- Kwong Kow Chinese School Inc — 0% of income from government
- Boston Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.