Skip to content

· Private foundation

Events for Good

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$39k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it funds
0180% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Employment$62kHealth$13kRecreation & Sports$12kPhilanthropy$12kPublic Benefit$12kYouth Development$1kReligion$800Human Services$710Other$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k13 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
$1,226
Median grant
5
States reached
$40k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JDRF$11,521
UPWARD BOUND$9,000
Individual grant recipient$6,000
MICHIGAN MOUNTAIN BIKING ASSN$4,000
THE TREVOR PROJECT$2,065
BCRFORG$2,000
LEAGUE OF MICHIGAN BICYCLISTS$1,226
BOYS GIRLS CLUB HOLLAND$1,000
Individual grant recipient$520
COMMUNITY ACTION HOUSE$500
SKYDIVE BRONCOS$417
FRIENDS OF THE FELT$400
MAKE A WISH$210
FEEDING AMERICA$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 29% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MAKE A WISH: $210 → 11%THE TREVOR PROJECT: $2k → 14%BCRFORG: $5k → 17%GIRLS ON THE RUN OTTAWA COUNTY: $300 → 8%MICHIGAN MOUNTAIN BIKING ASSN: $4k → 8%THE CITY OF THE VILLAGE OF DOUGLAS: $8k → 10%MISSION INDIA: $50 → 11%SKYDIVE BRONCOS: $417 → 12%THE ALEX MANDARINO FOUNDATION: $6k → 15%LEAGUE OF MICHIGAN BICYCLISTS: $1k → 16%BCRFORG: $5k → 17%THE CITY OF THE VILLAGE OF DOUGLAS: $3k → 10%GRANDVILE ACADEMIC TEAM BOOSTERS: $100 → 11%SKYDIVE BRONCOS: $416 → 12%THE ALEX MANDARINO FOUNDATION: $5k → 15%LEAGUE OF MICHIGAN BICYCLISTS: $1k → 16%BCRFORG: $2k → 17%THE CITY OF THE VILLAGE OF DOUGLAS: $1k → 10%UPCYCLE BICYCLES: $520 → 11%LEAGUE OF MICHIGAN BICYCLISTS: $945 → 16%SOUTHSIDE BUS TRANSPORTATION: $7k → 10%UPCYCLE BICYCLES: $515 → 11%SOUTHSIDE BUS TRANSPORTATION: $6k → 10%SOUTHSIDE BUS TRANSPORTATION: $6k → 10%SOUTHSIDE BUS TRANSPORTATION: $5k → 10%BENTHEIM CHURCH: $250 → 10%UPWARD BOUND: $11k → 10%UPWARD BOUND: $9k → 10%UPWARD BOUND: $9k → 10%BOYS GIRLS CLUB HOLLAND: $1k → 10%COMMUNITY ACTION HOUSE: $500 → 10%FEARLESS CHURCHES: $500 → 10%FRIENDS OF THE FELT: $400 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$140k · 11 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
5

Total granted

$140k
$1k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-7%
+85%

Still filing today

27%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EmploymentHealthCivil RightsArts & CultureFood & NutritionEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MDRC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $33k · revenue +36%
  • UB
    UPWARD BOUND
    3× · 2022–2024 · $29k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    4× · 2021–2024 · $23k

Funded once

  • FC
    FEARLESS CHURCHES
    one grant, 2023 · $500
  • GO
    GIRLS ON THE RUN OTTAWA COUNTY
    one grant, 2023 · $300
  • BC
    BENTHEIM CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $250
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Michigan Glass Project
Public Benefit
2
Home Builders Association of Michigan

A voice of the building industry in Michigan. The primary purpose is to positively influence the legislative, regulatory and legal issues that affect the industry.

—
3
Michigan Farm Bureau

Michigan farm bureau (mfb) is a member directed agricultural organization whose purpose is to represent, protect, and enhance the business, economic, social, and educational interests of our members located throughout the state of michigan.

—
4
Motor City Mountain Biking Assoc

Preserving, protecting, and promoting mountain bike access and diverse riding opportunities on metropolitain detroit's public lands through education, communication, and unified action.

Recreation & Sports
5
Michigan Advocacy Program

To advance the safety, independence, and economic stability of those most affected by poverty, racism, and other structurally oppressive systems by increasing access to justice and working for systemic solutions.

Crime & Legal
6
Michigan League for Public Policy

The league's mission is to promote racial equity, economic security, health, and well being for all people in michigan through policy change.

Human Services
7
Coalition to Protect Michigan Resources

The coalition to protect michigan resources's mission is to be a strong voice for the equitable co-management of michigan's fisheries, with both the great lakes and inland lakes and streams, to insure that conservation principles remain in…

Environment
8
Michigan Rising Action

Michigan Rising Action is focused on holding special interest networks accountable and advancing conservative principles. We're fighting for limited government, lowering taxes, fighting government over-regulation that stifles freedom, free…

—
9
Michigan Conservative Action Policies

Michigan conservative action policies (mcap) is an organization dedicated to educating michiganders on important policy issues. the organization conducts policy research and public polling in michigan to better understand current opinions…

—
10
Mcma Advocacy Fund

To advocate for the cannabis manufacturers in michigan

—
11
Michigan Center of Accountability for Republicans

Social welfare and issue advocacy

Civil Rights
12
Michigan Climate Action Network

Our mission is to amplify connect and support the people organizations and communities demanding urgent bold and equitable solutions for a just transition to a resilient future.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Trevor Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Feeding America. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UPWARD BOUND: $29,000 · OtherUPWARD BOUNDIndividual grant recipient: $23,012 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBCRFORG: $12,000 · OtherBCRFORGTHE CITY OF THE VILLAGE OF DOUGLAS: $11,500 · OtherTHE CITY OF THE VILLAGE OF DOUGLASMEMBA: $11,125 · OtherMEMBAMACATAWA CYCLING CLUB: $4,256 · OtherMichigan Mountain Biking Association: $4,000 · Other+10 more: $7,849 · Other+10 moreMDRC: $33,302 · EmploymentMDRCTHE ALEX MANDARINO FOUNDATION: $10,500 · HealthTREVOR PROJECT INC: $2,065 · Civil RightsFRIENDS OF THE FELT ESTATE: $400 · Arts & CultureFeeding America: $100 · Food & NutritionGRANDVILLE ACADEMIC TEAM BOOSTERS: $100 · Education
Other$102,742Employment$33,302Health$10,500Civil Rights$2,065Arts & Culture$400Food & Nutrition$100Education$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMDRC: $33,302 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ALEX MANDARINO FOUNDATION: $10,500 over 2y, 8.7% of budgetLEAGUE OF MICHIGAN BICYCLISTS INC: $3,171 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC: $2,065 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION HOUSE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE FELT ESTATE: $400 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFeeding America: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGRANDVILLE ACADEMIC TEAM BOOSTERS: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MDRC ↗
  • Who funds THE ALEX MANDARINO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Michigan Mountain Biking Association ↗
  • Who funds LEAGUE OF MICHIGAN BICYCLISTS INC ↗
  • Who funds TREVOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE FELT ESTATE ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds GRANDVILLE ACADEMIC TEAM BOOSTERS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Events for Good funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Events for Good. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Events for Good?

    Find your warmest path to Events for Good through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Events for Good’s filings →

    More from the funding graph