Skip to content

· Private foundation

Evans Runyan Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$120k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Environment$195kHousing & Shelter$143kHuman Services$63kHealth$47kYouth Development$27kCrime & Legal$15kEducation$5kFood & Nutrition$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $80k
$7,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$800k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WATERWATCH OF OREGON$25,000
OREGON NATURAL DESERT ASSOCIATION$15,000
STREET ROOTS$10,000
OREGON COMMUNITY WAREHOUSE$10,000
OUTSIDE IN$10,000
RAPHAEL HOUSE$10,000
TRANSITION PROJECTS$7,500
CENTRAL CITY CONCERN$7,500
FRIENDS OF COLUMBIA GORGE$5,000
FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN$5,000
ROSE HAVEN CIC$5,000
FOREST PARK CONSERVANCY$2,500
BLANCHET HOUSE$2,500
PLANNED PARENTHOOD COLUMBIA WILLAMETTE$2,500
CASA FOR CHILDREN$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $116k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%STREET ROOTS: $10k → 12%STREET ROOTS: $8k → 12%STREET ROOTS: $5k → 12%STREET ROOTS: $5k → 12%STREET ROOTS: $4k → 12%STREET ROOTS: $3k → 12%RAPHAEL HOUSE: $10k → 12%RAPHAEL HOUSE: $9k → 12%RAPHAEL HOUSE: $9k → 12%RAPHAEL HOUSE: $8k → 12%RAPHAEL HOUSE: $8k → 12%RAPHAEL HOUSE: $5k → 12%OREGON COMMUNITY WAREHOUSE: $10k → 12%OREGON COMMUNITY WAREHOUSE: $8k → 12%OREGON COMMUNITY WAREHOUSE: $5k → 12%OREGON COMMUNITY WAREHOUSE: $5k → 12%OREGON COMMUNITY WAREHOUSE: $5k → 12%OREGON COMMUNITY WAREHOUSE: $1k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$489k · 15 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +61% since the first grant, against -21% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
3

Total granted

$489k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+61%
-21%

Still filing today

93%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentEnvironmentCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WO
    WaterWatch of Oregon
    6× · 2020–2025 · $120k · revenue +246%
  • RAPHAEL HOUSE OF PORTLAND
    6× · 2020–2025 · $48k · revenue +88%
  • OUTSIDE IN
    6× · 2020–2025 · $45k · revenue +61%

Funded once

  • H
    HERETOGETHER
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
  • SO
    SISTERS OF THE ROAD CAF
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
  • P
    PEAR
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue -21%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Portland Street Medicine

We offer our homeless neighbors accessible whole-person care to improve and support health, and to bridge a gap in trust between people and systems.

Health
2
Operation Nightwatch - Portland

Operation Nightwatch provides nighttime hospitality for Portland's unhoused population. For a few evenings a week, staff and volunteers at thehospitality center provide a safe place, food, socks, blankets, medical care, and welcome our…

Health
3
Eastern Oregon Health and Wellness Inc

Eastern oregon health & wellness provides recovery housing and outpatient services that support individuals and families impacted by substance use disorder through safe housing, trauma-informed care, and community-based support.

Health
4
Beyond These Walls

Beyond These Walls supports LGBTQ people impacted by incarceration in Oregon by providing direct service housing and advocacy.

Civil Rights
5
Restoration House Inc

Restoration House provides save, supervised housing for men with significant behavioral health needs, creating a stable environment where structure, accountability, and wraparound services support personal growth and long-term recovery.…

Health
6
Sheltercare

Sheltercare offers a variety of housing and support services for people who are homeless or those facing homelessness with a committed focus on the community's most vulnerable individuals dealing with psychiatric disabilities, acquired…

Housing & Shelter
7
Impact Nw

Impact nw prevents homelessness by supporting people as they navigate their journey to stability and strength. founded in portland in 1966, impact nw now serves 26,944 people a year in the greater portland, oregon metro area, including…

Human Services
8
Oregon Casa Network

To lead oregon's casa programs to provide a strong voice for every abused and neglected child

Human Services
9
Oregon Justice Network

Oregon Justice Network is an alliance built and staffed by criminal legal system impacted people advocating for the well-being of people affected or at-risk of being affected by carceral systems. Our work centers around restorative…

Human Services
10
Welcome Home Coalition

Welcome Home is a diverse coalition in the Portland metropolitan region that uses its collective resources to create healthy communities by ensuring everyone has an affordable and stable home. We use community education and collaboration…

Community Improvement
11
Ywca of Greater Portland

To eliminate racism, empower women and promote peace, justice, freedom and dignity for all.

Human Services
12
Portland Harbor Community Coalition

Portland Harbor Community Coalition (PHCC) organizes frontline groups and individuals to heal the water, land, and air in and around the Wa'lmaomt (Willamette River) federal Superfund area, polluted from over a century of heavy industrial…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Casa for Children Inc; the most unlike its peers is WaterWatch of Oregon. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
14/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WaterWatch of Oregon: $119,500 · OtherWaterWatch of OregonOUTSIDE IN: $44,500 · OtherOUTSIDE INOREGON NATURAL DESERT ASSOCIATION: $37,000 · OtherOREGON NATURAL DESERT ASSOCIATIONTransition Projects Inc: $28,000 · OtherTransition Projects IncFRIENDS OF COLUMBIA GORGE: $20,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF COLUMBIA GORGEBLANCHET HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY: $14,500 · OtherBLANCHET HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY+2 more: $5,000 · OtherRAPHAEL HOUSE OF PORTLAND: $48,000 · Human ServicesRAPHAEL HOUSE OF PORTLANDSTREET ROOTS INC: $34,000 · Human ServicesSTREET ROOTS INCOregon Community Warehouse Inc: $33,500 · Human ServicesOregon Community Warehouse…Central City Concern: $31,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE COLUMBIA WILLAMETTE INC: $2,500 · HealthFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $26,500 · Youth DevelopmentTHE FOREST PARK CONSERVANCY: $18,000 · EnvironmentROSE HAVEN CIC: $15,000 · Housing & ShelterPEAR: $1,000 · Housing & ShelterCASA FOR CHILDREN INC: $14,500 · Civil RightsFRIENDS OF OUTDOOR SCHOOL: $5,000 · Education
Other$268,500Human Services$115,500Health$33,500Youth Development$26,500Environment$18,000Housing & Shelter$16,000Civil Rights$14,500Education$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWaterWatch of Oregon: $119,500 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetRAPHAEL HOUSE OF PORTLAND: $48,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetOUTSIDE IN: $44,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetOREGON NATURAL DESERT ASSOCIATION: $37,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetSTREET ROOTS INC: $34,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetOregon Community Warehouse Inc: $33,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCentral City Concern: $31,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTransition Projects Inc: $28,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $26,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOREST PARK CONSERVANCY: $18,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetROSE HAVEN CIC: $15,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCASA FOR CHILDREN INC: $14,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBLANCHET HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY: $14,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF OUTDOOR SCHOOL: $5,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE COLUMBIA WILLAMETTE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEAR: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WaterWatch of Oregon ↗
  • Who funds RAPHAEL HOUSE OF PORTLAND ↗
  • Who funds OUTSIDE IN ↗
  • Who funds OREGON NATURAL DESERT ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds STREET ROOTS INC ↗
  • Who funds Oregon Community Warehouse Inc ↗
  • Who funds Central City Concern ↗
  • Who funds Transition Projects Inc ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds THE FOREST PARK CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds ROSE HAVEN CIC ↗
  • Who funds CASA FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds BLANCHET HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF OUTDOOR SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE COLUMBIA WILLAMETTE INC ↗
  • Who funds PEAR ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community FoundationOR20.7× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · Meyer Memorial Trust · Oregon Jewish Community Foundation · Rose E Tucker Charitable Trust · The Collins Foundation · Hillman Family Foundations · The Starseed Foundation · The Larson Legacy · The Jackson Foundation · Onpoint Community Credit Union · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Evans Runyan Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Evans Runyan Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • WaterWatch of Oregon: 61% of income from government
  • Outside in: 33% of income from government
  • Transition Projects Inc: 29% of income from government
  • Oregon Community Warehouse Inc: 24% of income from government
  • Central City Concern: 10% of income from government
  • Raphael House of Portland: 10% of income from government
  • Oregon Natural Desert Association: 9% of income from government
  • Planned Parenthood of the Columbia Willamette Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Casa for Children Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Pear: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Evans Runyan Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Evans Runyan Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Evans Runyan Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph