Skip to content

· Public charity

Eurith Leydig Memorial Center

To service the disadvantaged people of dixon and surrounding county area by providing donations to other charitable 501(c)(3) organizations with the proceeds received from the sale of donated clothing and household items to local individuals at thrift shop.

$48k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$23k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$362kFood & Nutrition$224kHealth$49kHousing & Shelter$35kRecreation & Sports$5k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $43,150, the rows itemized in this filing. The $48,150 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $5,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $37k
$14,250
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAUK VALLEY FOODBANK$22,900
ST VINCENT DEPAUL$14,250
YMCA$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%RIVER BEND FOODBANK: $12k → 12%DIXON AREA EMERGENCY NEEDS: $48k → 12%SAUK VALLEY FOODBANK: $23k → 13%DIXON AREA EMERGENCY NEEDS: $48k → 12%SAUK VALLEY FOOD PANTRY: $21k → 13%DIXON AREA EMERGENCY NEEDS: $48k → 12%SAUK VALLEY FOODBANK: $17k → 13%DIXON AREA EMERGENCY NEEDS: $20k → 12%SAUK VALLEY FOOD PANTRY: $15k → 13%DIXON FOOD PANTRY: $36k → 12%ST VINCENT DEPAUL: $14k → 13%DIXON FOOD PANTRY: $36k → 12%ST VINCENT DEPAUL: $14k → 13%DIXON FOOD PANTRY: $34k → 12%SAUK VALLEY FOODBANK: $13k → 13%DIXON FOOD PANTRY: $15k → 12%SAUK VALLEY FOOD PANTRY: $13k → 13%KREIDER SERVICES INC: $13k → 12%SAUK VALLEY FOOD PANTRY: $12k → 13%KREIDER SERVICES INC: $13k → 12%ST VINCENT DEPAUL: $11k → 13%PADS: $12k → 12%ST VINCENT DEPAUL: $7k → 13%KREIDER SERVICES INC: $12k → 12%PADS: $10k → 12%KREIDER SERVICES INC: $10k → 12%PADS: $7k → 12%YMCA: $6k → 12%PADS: $6k → 12%GOODFELLOWS: $6k → 12%ELKS LODGE 779: $5k → 12%HOME OF HOPE: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 100% of Eurith Leydig Memorial Center’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 98% of the giving stays in IL; by stated purpose, 0%.

Eurith Leydig Memorial Centerlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$687k · 7 repeat orgs$31k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +18% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
4

Total granted

$687k
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+11%

Still filing today

57%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionHousing & ShelterHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY
    4× · 2017–2020 · $121k · revenue +18% · 40% of their budget
  • SV
    Sauk Valley Foodbank
    7× · 2017–2025 · $114k · revenue ×44
  • KS
    KREIDER SERVICES INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $47k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • RB
    RIVER BEND FOOD RESERVOIR
    one grant, 2024 · $12k · revenue -3%
  • G
    GOODFELLOWS
    one grant, 2021 · $6k
  • DE
    Dixon Elks Lodge #779graduated
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +91%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Northern Il Helping Hands Food Pantry Nfp

To provide at least 2 days of food to needy families and people.

Food & Nutrition
2
Geneseo-Atkinson Food Pantry

The Christian mission of the Geneseo-Atkinson food Pantry is to provide food, clothing, and short-term emergency assistance for families and individuals residing in Geneseo (61254) or Atkinson (61235) zip code areas.

—
3
Prairie Ridge Food Pantry

tohelpfightfoodinsecurity.wereviveandgivedonatedfooditemstothoselessfortunate.

Food & Nutrition
4
Cicero-Berwyn-Stickney Food Pantry

To collect and distribute food and other supplies at no cost to the needy in the Cicero-Berwyn-Stickney (Illinois) area.

Human Services
5
Community Needs of Chillicothe Illinois Inc

Provide temporary assistance to needy individuals. Primary assistance with rent, utilities and food.

—
6
Dupage Township Food Pantry

Provide food and other resources to low-income families

Food & Nutrition
7
New Vision Community Services

Food Pantry

Food & Nutrition
8
Sun Prairie Emergency Food Pantry Inc

Provide food & personal care items to families in need.

—
9
Putnam County Food Pantry

To provide food and other grocery items to needy residents of Putnam County, Illinois, and to transients in need.

Food & Nutrition
10
Adams County Food Pantry
Food & Nutrition
11
German Valley Food Pantry
Food & Nutrition
12
Just Food Initiative of the Fox Valley
Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dixon Area Emergency Needs Fund; the most unlike its peers is Hope Cancer Wellness Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DIXON AREA EMERGENCY NEEDS FUND: $164,000 · OtherDIXON AREA EMERGENCY NEEDS FUNDTHE SALVATION ARMY: $160,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYKREIDER SERVICES INC: $47,400 · OtherKREIDER SERVICES INCST VINCENT DEPAUL: $45,750 · OtherST VINCENT DEPAUL+3 more: $17,450 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY: $121,000 · Food & NutritionCOMMUNITY FOOD PANTRYSauk Valley Foodbank: $114,100 · Food & NutritionSauk Valley FoodbankRIVER BEND FOOD RESERVOIR: $12,000 · Food & NutritionDIXON PADS SHELTER: $35,000 · Housing & ShelterHOPE CANCER WELLNESS CENTERS: $2,000 · Health
Other$434,600Food & Nutrition$247,100Housing & Shelter$35,000Health$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDIXON AREA EMERGENCY NEEDS FUND: $164,000 over 4y, 90% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY: $121,000 over 4y, 40% of budgetSauk Valley Foodbank: $114,100 over 7y, 14% of budgetKREIDER SERVICES INC: $47,400 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetDIXON PADS SHELTER: $35,000 over 4y, 14% of budgetRIVER BEND FOOD RESERVOIR: $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDixon Elks Lodge #779: $5,450 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetHOPE CANCER WELLNESS CENTERS: $2,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DIXON AREA EMERGENCY NEEDS FUND ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY ↗
  • Who funds Sauk Valley Foodbank ↗
  • Who funds KREIDER SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds DIXON PADS SHELTER ↗
  • Who funds RIVER BEND FOOD RESERVOIR ↗
  • Who funds Dixon Elks Lodge #779 ↗
  • Who funds HOPE CANCER WELLNESS CENTERS ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Eurith Leydig Memorial Center funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Eurith Leydig Memorial Center. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Eurith Leydig Memorial Center?

    Find your warmest path to Eurith Leydig Memorial Center through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Eurith Leydig Memorial Center’s filings →

    More from the funding graph