Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Eurith Leydig Memorial Center

To service the disadvantaged people of dixon and surrounding county area by providing donations to other charitable 501(c)(3) organizations with the proceeds received from the sale of donated clothing and household items to local individuals at thrift shop.

$43k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$17k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Human Services$362kFood & Nutrition$224kHealth$49kHousing & Shelter$35kRecreation & Sports$5k
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$14,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAUK VALLEY FOODBANK$16,900
ST VINCENT DEPAUL$14,000
RIVER BEND FOODBANK$12,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%RIVER BEND FOODBANK: $12k → 12%DIXON AREA EMERGENCY NEEDS: $48k → 12%SAUK VALLEY FOOD PANTRY: $21k → 13%DIXON AREA EMERGENCY NEEDS: $48k → 12%SAUK VALLEY FOODBANK: $17k → 13%DIXON AREA EMERGENCY NEEDS: $48k → 12%SAUK VALLEY FOOD PANTRY: $15k → 13%DIXON AREA EMERGENCY NEEDS: $20k → 12%ST VINCENT DEPAUL: $14k → 13%DIXON FOOD PANTRY: $36k → 12%SAUK VALLEY FOODBANK: $13k → 13%DIXON FOOD PANTRY: $36k → 12%SAUK VALLEY FOOD PANTRY: $13k → 13%DIXON FOOD PANTRY: $34k → 12%SAUK VALLEY FOOD PANTRY: $12k → 13%DIXON FOOD PANTRY: $15k → 12%ST VINCENT DEPAUL: $11k → 13%KREIDER SERVICES INC: $13k → 12%ST VINCENT DEPAUL: $7k → 13%KREIDER SERVICES INC: $13k → 12%KREIDER SERVICES INC: $12k → 12%PADS: $12k → 12%PADS: $10k → 12%KREIDER SERVICES INC: $10k → 12%PADS: $7k → 12%GOODFELLOWS: $6k → 12%PADS: $6k → 12%ELKS LODGE 779: $5k → 12%HOME OF HOPE: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 100% of Eurith Leydig Memorial Center’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 98% of the giving stays in IL; read by stated purpose it is 0% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Eurith Leydig Memorial Centerlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$650k · 7 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
3

Total granted

$650k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+72%

Still filing today

57%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Food & NutritionHousing & ShelterHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY
    4× · 2017–2020 · $121k · revenue +18% · 40% of their budget
  • SV
    Sauk Valley Foodbank
    6× · 2017–2024 · $91k · revenue ×44
  • KS
    KREIDER SERVICES INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $47k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • G
    GOODFELLOWS
    one grant, 2021 · $6k
  • DE
    Dixon Elks Lodge #779graduated
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +72%
  • HC
    HOPE CANCER WELLNESS CENTERS
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +19%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Northern Il Helping Hands Food Pantry Nfp

To provide at least 2 days of food to needy families and people.

Food & Nutrition
2
Geneseo-Atkinson Food Pantry

The Christian mission of the Geneseo-Atkinson food Pantry is to provide food, clothing, and short-term emergency assistance for families and individuals residing in Geneseo (61254) or Atkinson (61235) zip code areas.

3
Prairie Ridge Food Pantry

tohelpfightfoodinsecurity.wereviveandgivedonatedfooditemstothoselessfortunate.

Food & Nutrition
4
Cicero-Berwyn-Stickney Food Pantry

To collect and distribute food and other supplies at no cost to the needy in the Cicero-Berwyn-Stickney (Illinois) area.

Human Services
5
Cumby Food Pantry

food pantry

Food & Nutrition
6
New Vision Community Services

Food Pantry

Food & Nutrition
7
Sun Prairie Emergency Food Pantry Inc

Provide food & personal care items to families in need.

8
German Valley Food Pantry
Food & Nutrition
9
Denison Soup Kitchen

Feeding the homeless and hungry

Human Services
10
Dexer Rural Neighbor Project

helping people

Food & Nutrition
11
Adams County Food Pantry
Food & Nutrition
12
Durand Area Loaves and Fishes Food Pantry

To provide food assistance to those who are in need.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dixon Area Emergency Needs Fund and the most unlike its peers is Hope Cancer Wellness Centers. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

DIXON AREA EMERGENCY NEEDS FUND — $164,000 · OtherDIXON AREA EMERGENCY NEEDS FUNDTHE SALVATION ARMY — $160,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYKREIDER SERVICES INC — $47,400 · OtherKREIDER SERVICES INCST VINCENT DEPAUL — $31,500 · OtherST VINCENT DEPAUL+2 more — $11,450 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY — $121,000 · Food & NutritionCOMMUNITY FOOD PANTRYSauk Valley Foodbank — $91,200 · Food & NutritionSauk Valley FoodbankRIVER BEND FOOD RESERVOIR — $12,000 · Food & NutritionRIVER BEND FOOD RESERVOIRDIXON PADS SHELTER — $35,000 · Housing & ShelterHOPE CANCER WELLNESS CENTERS — $2,000 · Health
Other$414,350Food & Nutrition$224,200Housing & Shelter$35,000Health$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDIXON AREA EMERGENCY NEEDS FUND — $164,000 over 4y, 90% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY — $121,000 over 4y, 40% of budgetSauk Valley Foodbank — $91,200 over 6y, 14% of budgetKREIDER SERVICES INC — $47,400 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetDIXON PADS SHELTER — $35,000 over 4y, 14% of budgetRIVER BEND FOOD RESERVOIR — $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDixon Elks Lodge #779 — $5,450 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetHOPE CANCER WELLNESS CENTERS — $2,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DIXON AREA EMERGENCY NEEDS FUND
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY
  • Who funds Sauk Valley Foodbank
  • Who funds KREIDER SERVICES INC
  • Who funds DIXON PADS SHELTER
  • Who funds RIVER BEND FOOD RESERVOIR
  • Who funds Dixon Elks Lodge #779
  • Who funds HOPE CANCER WELLNESS CENTERS

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Eurith Leydig Memorial Center funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Eurith Leydig Memorial Center?

    Find your warmest path to Eurith Leydig Memorial Center through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph