Skip to content

· Private foundation

Eugen Friedlaender Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$24k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Philanthropy$27kCivil Rights$20kEducation$10kRecreation & Sports$6kInternational$5kAnimals$4kHousing & Shelter$1kArts & Culture$500Other$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $4k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$1,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$908k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WOMAN UNITED AGAINST THE WORLD$20,000
WILDLIFE CONSERVATION SOCIETY$1,500
ROCKIN T EQUINE RESCUE$1,000
DOUBLE B EQUINE RESCUE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 20%. 4% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 20%WILDLIFE CONSERVATION SOCIETY: $2k → 28%SEE ATTACHED SCH: $26k → 7%ROCKIN T EQUINE RESCUE: $1k → 13%DOUBLE B EQUINE RESCUE: $1k → 14%Side x Side: $5k → 7%Chebeague Island Rec: $1k → 7%Family Ice Center: $3k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Flip Side Sanctuary

Our mission is to rescue animals from neglect and abuse inspire change in the way they are seen and treated and advocate for a cruelty-free lifestyle. We rescued and rehabilitated 4 new animals providing critical medical care adopted 3…

Animals
2
Baiting Hollow Farm Horse Rescue Inc

Horse rescue

—
3
Abbe Freeland Animal Sanctuary Inc

Rehabilitation of injured and orphaned wildlife. We respond to the need of injured and orphaned wildlife 24hr/day, 365days/yr. We accept most wildlife with beavers and Porcupines rehab being our specialty. We are one of the only Beaver…

Animals
4
Pawsitive Possibilities Rescue Inc

Animal Rescue providing care and shelter for animals while finding suitable families for adoption.

Animals
5
Thunder Mountain Farms Equine Rescue

Rescue horses from slaughter and neglect and find homes for them.

Animals
6
Paisleys Place and the Home of the Unadoptables

Housing for retired and unadoptable animals. including hospitalization and surgeries for mules and other animals.

Animals
7
Bright Side Sanctuary Inc

Sanctuary for abused and neglected farm animals

Animals
8
Farm Way Sanctuary Inc

Horse Rescue. The Farm Way provides sanctuary for abused, unwanted, injured and retired horses and other domesticated animals in need of a safe and loving home.

Animals
9
Pleasure Acres Equine and Feline Rescue Center

Maintain Equine Rescue Center

—
10
Fur and Tails Animal Rescue Inc

Foster based animal rescue that provides support for homeless, injured or sick animals, rehabilitating with hopes of adoption to the public. Also operates a foster based sanctuary to provide long term care for un-adoptable pets.

Animals
11
Farm at Oatland North

The Farm rescues and provides sanctuary for abused, neglected, and abandoned animals. At the Farm, animals learn to trust again and have a chance to

Arts & Culture
12
Cat Tail Farms Feline Sanctuary

Animal rescue and housing

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Urban Pathways Inc; the most unlike its peers is Wildlife Conservation Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WOMAN UNITED AGAINST THE WORLD: $20,000 · OtherWOMAN UNITED AGAINST THE WORLDWomen United around the World: $5,000 · OtherWomen United around the WorldIndividual grant recipient: $1,000 · Other+2 more: $1,000 · OtherSide x Side Inc: $5,000 · EducationSide x Side IncPACE UNIVERSITY: $5,000 · EducationPACE UNIVERSITYFamily Ice Center: $6,000 · Recreation & SportsFamily Ice Cen…Wildlife Conservation Society: $1,500 · AnimalsRockin T Equine Rescue: $1,000 · AnimalsDOUBLE B EQUINE RESCUE CORP: $1,000 · AnimalsURBAN PATHWAYS INC: $1,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$27,000Education$10,000Recreation & Sports$6,000Animals$3,500Housing & Shelter$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFamily Ice Center: $6,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSide x Side Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetPACE UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWildlife Conservation Society: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRockin T Equine Rescue: $1,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetURBAN PATHWAYS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Eugen Friedlaender Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Eugen Friedlaender Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Eugen Friedlaender’s filings →

    More from the funding graph