Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ethel Mae Kreutz Private Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$38k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$22k
Largest
01What it funds
0180% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$85kEducation$43kHealth$33kYouth Development$27kHousing & Shelter$21kFood & Nutrition$13kPublic Benefit$8kReligion$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k14 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $22k
$500
Median grant
2
States reached
$467k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LACROSSE SOCIAL SERVICES$22,148
MEDICAL ASSISTANCE JT MAYO CLINIC$5,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
TREMPEALEAU COUNTY SOCIAL SERVICES$2,000
BUFFALO CO K-9$1,000
LEVIATHANS ROBOTICS PABLO CTR$1,000
BUFFALO COUNTY FOOD SHELF$500
HOPE 4 YOU BUFFALO COUNTY$500
BOY SCOUT TROOP 110$500
CASTLEROCK MUSEUM$500
GRACE PLACE$500
Individual grant recipient$350
Individual grant recipient$274
Individual grant recipient$250
SCENIC VALLEY MUNI POOL$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%LA CRESCENT HOKAH SCHOOL DISTRICT: $2k → 8%MEDICAL ASSISTANCE JT MAYO CLINIC: $5k → 9%COMMUNITY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $7k → 14%TREMPEALEAU COUNTY SOCIAL SERVICES: $6k → 9%SCENIC VALLEY AMBULANCE: $6k → 10%LEVIATHANS ROBOTICS PABLO CTR: $1k → 12%HEAD START CHILD & FAMILY DEVELOPMENT: $2k → 12%ST CANCER DRIVE MAYO CLINIC: $1k → 9%SOUTHEASTERN MINNESOTA TECHNICAL SCHOOL: $6k → 14%TREMPEALEAU COUNTY SOCIAL SERVICES: $2k → 9%CITY OF BUFFALO CITY: $5k → 10%HEAD START CHILD & FAMILY DEVELOPMENT: $2k → 12%MEDICAL ASSISTANCE JT MAYO CLINIC: $1k → 9%BIG BROTHERS AND BIG SISTERS OF WINONA: $6k → 14%IC CHURCH: $5k → 9%CITY OF BUFFALO CITY: $3k → 10%LACROSSE SOCIAL SERVICES: $22k → 12%GRACE PLACE: $5k → 14%IC CHURCH: $4k → 9%LORENZ HEART TRANSPLANT FUND: $2k → 10%CARE WISCONSIN PROGRAM: $17k → 12%BIG BROTHERS AND BIG SISTERS OF WINONA: $5k → 14%ST J CHURCH: $2k → 9%COCHRANE PARK AND REC FUND: $1k → 10%LACROSSE SOCIAL SERVICES: $15k → 12%BIG BROTHERS AND BIG SISTERS OF WINONA: $5k → 14%WESTERN DAIRYLAND SHELTER: $5k → 9%HANSEN FUND: $1k → 10%LACROSSE SOCIAL SERVICES: $9k → 12%BIG BROTHERS AND BIG SISTERS OF WINONA: $5k → 14%WESTERN DAIRYLAND HEAD START: $1k → 9%TRI COMMUNITY FIRE DEPARTMENT: $1k → 10%LACROSSE SOCIAL SERVICES: $6k → 12%GRACE PLACE: $5k → 14%APTIV: $3k → 12%GRACE PLACE: $5k → 14%CARE WISCONSIN PROGRAM: $3k → 12%BIG BROTHERS AND BIG SISTERS OF WINONA: $5k → 14%APTIV: $2k → 12%SOUTHEASTERN MINNESOTA TECHNICAL SCHOOL: $4k → 14%WINONA CO HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $3k → 14%ROTARY OF WINONA: $1k → 14%DENISE DOERR ACIDENT FUND: $10k → 10%ST MARYS CHURCH: $6k → 10%PARISH LIFE SERIES: $3k → 10%PARISH LIFE SERIES: $3k → 10%BUFFALO CO: $6k → 10%BUFFALO CO: $3k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 8% of Ethel Mae Kreutz Private Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Ethel Mae Kreutz Private Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$228k · 26 repeat orgs$48k to everyone else

26 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
20

Total granted

$228k
$45k

Still filing today

19%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Housing & ShelterArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GP
    GRACE PLACE INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $16k · revenue +55%
  • CM
    COMMUNITY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL INCORPORATED
    2× · 2019–2020 · $7k · revenue +60%
  • AI
    APTIV INC
    3× · 2018–2020 · $6k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • DD
    DENISE DOERR ACIDENT FUND
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • SM
    ST MARYS CHURCH
    one grant, 2017 · $6k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
05the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
4/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LACROSSE SOCIAL SERVICES: $52,409 · OtherLACROSSE SOCIAL SERVICESVARIOUS INDIVIDUAL SCHOLARSHIP GRANTS: $27,868 · OtherVARIOUS INDIVIDUAL SCHOLARSHIP GRANTSBIG BROTHERS AND BIG SISTERS OF WINONA: $25,595 · OtherBIG BROTHERS AND BIG SISTERS OF WINONACARE WISCONSIN PROGRAM: $19,393 · OtherCARE WISCONSIN PROGRAMSOUTHEASTERN MINNESOTA TECHNICAL SCHOOL: $10,648 · OtherDENISE DOERR ACIDENT FUND: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $9,450 · OtherIC CHURCH: $8,500 · Other+39 more: $89,710 · Other+39 moreGRACE PLACE INC: $15,500 · Housing & ShelterAPTIV INC: $5,548 · Housing & ShelterCastlerock Museum Inc: $1,250 · Arts & Culture
Other$253,573Housing & Shelter$21,048Arts & Culture$1,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGRACE PLACE INC: $15,500 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL INCORPORATED: $7,082 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAPTIV INC: $5,548 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHEAD START CHILD & FAMILY DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC: $4,169 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCastlerock Museum Inc: $1,250 over 3y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GRACE PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds APTIV INC ↗
  • Who funds HEAD START CHILD & FAMILY DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds Castlerock Museum Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ethel Mae Kreutz Private Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ethel Mae Kreutz Private Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ethel Mae Kreutz Private’s filings →

    More from the funding graph