Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ethel and Sam Garber Foundation Martin Wolf Trustee

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$56k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$55kHealth$50kPhilanthropy$44kCrime & Legal$40kArts & Culture$34kReligion$21kInternational$14kAnimals$13kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHASE COLLEGE OF LAW$6,000
MERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION$5,000
UNIVER OF CINCINNNATI FOUNDATION$5,000
LA SALLE HIGH SCHOOL$5,000
JEWISH EDUCATION FOR EVERY PERSON$5,000
LA SOUP INC$5,000
LAWERS CLUB OF CINCINNATI$5,000
ST XAVIER HIGH SCHOOL$3,000
NEU GLOBAL$3,000
BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION$3,000
NATIONAL STUTTERING PROJECT$2,000
CHASE COLLEGE FOUNDATION$2,000
MYLES AHEAD ANIMAL SANCTUARY$1,000
XAVIER JESUIT ACADEMY$1,000
UNIVER OF CINCINNNATI FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 64% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CHILDREN OF THE NIGHT: $500 → 14%CHILDREN OF THE NIGHT: $500 → 14%LOVE LIKE JJ: $2k → 6%CHILDREN OF THE NIGHT: $250 → 14%CHILDREN OF THE NIGHT: $250 → 14%CHILDREN OF THE NIGHT: $250 → 14%CHILDREN OF THE NIGHT: $250 → 14%FIRST STEP HOME: $1k → 16%SWEET CHEEKS DIAPER BANK: $500 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$232k · 20 repeat orgs$57k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
19

Total granted

$232k
$43k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+4%
+28%

Still filing today

40%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesAnimalsHealthEducationPhilanthropyCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BS
    Bon Secours Mercy Health Foundation
    3× · 2023–2025 · $15k · revenue +74%
  • BI
    BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION
    4× · 2022–2025 · $14k · revenue +3%
  • CC
    CHASE COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $11k · revenue +387%

Funded once

  • AA
    ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • OH
    OAK HILLS LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • BY
    BRIDGETOWN YOUTH ATHLETIC ACCOCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +47%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Foundation of Cincinnati
Philanthropy
2
Fosterbabycats

We rescue orphaned and abandoned neonatal kittens.

Animals
3
Foundation for Cincinnati Jewish Seniors formerly Jewish Home of Cincinnati Inc
Health
4
Columbus Cares for Cats
—
5
Hope for Cleveland's Children
—
6
Josh Cares Inc

Josh cares provides companionship and comfort to children hospitalized in critical care units at childrens' hospital who are alone. josh cares fellows serve as surrogates for, and as links to, the families who would be by their childrens'…

—
7
A Special Rescue

To create generative and therapeutic opportunities and locations for adults, teens, children, and animals that indend to empower, heal and nurture.

—
8
Pets in Need of Greater Cincinnati Inc

To provide affordable, high-quality veterinary care to allow individuals and families of limited means to enjoy benefits of healthy and responsible pet ownership. Anyone who wants to share a loving home with a pet should have access to…

Animals
9
Cincinnati Animal Care Humane Society

We meet the immediate needs of animals in our community through individualized care, life saving solutions, and temporary shelter en-route to a safe, compatible home. we envision a community where all animals are valued, protected and have…

Animals
10
Cause for Canines

Cause for Canines is a 501c3, all-breed dog rescue in Columbus, Ohio ran solely by volunteers. In 2025, we rescued and adopted out 66 dogs.

Animals
11
Jewish Family Service of the Cincinnati Area

A social service agency, JFS strengthens lives and our diverse community by providing exceptional and transformational human services. Services include: Counseling, Case Management, Financial and Food Support, Home Care, Senior Services,…

Human Services
12
League for Animal Welfare

To reduce the number of homeless cats and dogs in greater cincinnati by providing a compassionate, no-kill animal shelter and programs that promote responsible pet care.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The First Step Home Inc; the most unlike its peers is Bridgetown Youth Athletic Accoc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
13/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVER OF CINCINNNATI FOUNDATION: $34,187 · OtherUNIVER OF CINCINNNATI FOUNDATIONCHASE COLLEGE OF LAW: $29,000 · OtherCHASE COLLEGE OF LAWST XAVIER HIGH SCHOOL INC: $15,000 · OtherST XAVIER HIGH SCHOOL INCNEU GLOBAL INC: $12,500 · OtherNEU GLOBAL INCISAAC M WISE TEMPLE: $12,000 · OtherISAAC M WISE TEMPLELA SALLE HIGH SCHOOL: $12,000 · OtherLA SALLE HIGH SCHOOLHEBREW UNION COLLEGE: $10,000 · OtherNATIONAL STUTTERING PROJECT: $9,000 · OtherNEUROSX FITZPATRICK CHIARI FOUND: $7,000 · Other+25 more: $62,000 · Other+25 moreJewish Education for Every Person: $27,000 · PhilanthropyJewish Educa…Jewish Federation of Cincinnati: $4,000 · PhilanthropyJewish Feder…Bon Secours Mercy Health Foundation: $15,000 · ReligionBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $14,000 · InternationalCHASE COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $11,000 · EducationLIVE LIKE MAYA FOUNDATION: $2,000 · EducationTHE DRAGONFLY FOUNDATION: $6,000 · HealthMAY WE HELP INC: $2,000 · HealthThe Karen Wellington Memorial Foundation: $1,000 · HealthTRISTATE NOAH PROJECT: $5,000 · AnimalsHOMELESS ANIMAL RESCUE TEAM: $2,000 · AnimalsFIGHTING CHANCE RESCUE: $1,000 · Animals
Other$202,687Philanthropy$31,000Religion$15,000International$14,000Education$13,000Health$9,000Animals$8,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJewish Education for Every Person: $27,000 over 6y, 3.1% of budgetBon Secours Mercy Health Foundation: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $14,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHASE COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $11,000 over 6y, 3.0% of budgetTHE DRAGONFLY FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBRIDGETOWN YOUTH ATHLETIC ACCOC: $5,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetTRISTATE NOAH PROJECT: $5,000 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetLA SOUPE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJewish Federation of Cincinnati: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRAPTOR INC: $3,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetProKids: $2,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLIVE LIKE MAYA FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetHOMELESS ANIMAL RESCUE TEAM: $2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLOVELIKEJJ: $2,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetMAY WE HELP INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetChildren of the Night: $2,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetThe Karen Wellington Memorial Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFriars Club Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FIRST STEP HOME INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFIGHTING CHANCE RESCUE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCOVERD GREATER CINCINNATI: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Jewish Education for Every Person ↗
  • Who funds Bon Secours Mercy Health Foundation ↗
  • Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHASE COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE DRAGONFLY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGETOWN YOUTH ATHLETIC ACCOC ↗
  • Who funds TRISTATE NOAH PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds LA SOUPE INC ↗
  • Who funds Jewish Federation of Cincinnati ↗
  • Who funds RAPTOR INC ↗
  • Who funds ProKids ↗
  • Who funds LIVE LIKE MAYA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOMELESS ANIMAL RESCUE TEAM ↗
  • Who funds LOVELIKEJJ ↗
  • Who funds MAY WE HELP INC ↗
  • Who funds Children of the Night ↗
  • Who funds The Karen Wellington Memorial Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Friars Club Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE FIRST STEP HOME INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Greater Cincinnati FoundationOH24× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · The James J and Joan a Gardner Family Foundation · Marge & Charles J Schott Foundation · The Scripps Howard Foundation · Johnson Charitable Gift Fund · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Edelweiss Foundation · Elsa M Heisel Sule Charitable Trust 2005 · Justin R Niklas Family Foundation · The Peter and Mary Levin Family Foundation · Robert a & Marian K Kennedy Charitable Trust · Farmer Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ethel and Sam Garber Foundation Martin Wolf Trustee funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ethel and Sam Garber Foundation Martin Wolf Trustee. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ethel and Sam Garber Foundation Martin Wolf Trustee?

    Find your warmest path to Ethel and Sam Garber Foundation Martin Wolf Trustee through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ethel and Sam Garber Foundation Martin Wolf Trustee’s filings →

    More from the funding graph