Loading…
· Private foundation
ESTATE GEORGE P WAKEFIELD RES TR
This foundation does not accept unsolicited requests — it funds preselected organizations.
$215k
Granted FY2024
11
Grants
3
Communities
$40k
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 49% of ESTATE GEORGE P WAKEFIELD RES TR’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02FY2024 · 11 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $208k
$20,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$3.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
- LIGHTHOUSE GUILD INTERNATIONAL INC$40,000
- St Dominic's Family Services$35,000
- COVENANT HOUSE$25,000
- THE FRESH AIR FUND$20,000
- CHILDREN'S AID$20,000
- THE SUMMER CAMP$20,000
- UNIVERSITY SETTLEMENT$15,000
- EAST END HOSPICE$12,500
- CAMPFIRE$10,000
- GREEN CHIMNEYS$10,000
- NEW YORK FOUNDLING HOSPITAL$7,500
02The need
03
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $175k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16% — the area typically sits at 11%. 71% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$740k · 12 repeat orgs$55k to everyone else
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +30% for the ones you funded once.
12 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
12
2
Total granted
$740k
$55k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+34%
+30%
Still filing today
58%
50%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Human ServicesPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
LIGHTHOUSE GUILD INTERNATIONAL INC4× · 2021–2024 · $150k · revenue +78%- TSTHE SUMMER CAMP4× · 2021–2024 · $80k · revenue +41%
THE FRESH AIR FUND4× · 2021–2024 · $80k · revenue +34%
Funded once
- SDSAINT DOMINICS FAMILY SERVICESgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $30k · revenue +30%
- TCTHE COVENANT HOUSE NEW YORKone grant, 2023 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
1199SEIUGREATER New York Child Care
To establish child care youth programs and related services for fund eligible 1199 members in order to increase their access to high quality, affordable child care and youth related services and information. to assist parents reconciling…
Membership Benefit
2
Good Shepherd Hospice Foundation Inc
We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.
—
3
Covenant House New Jersey Inc
To provide shelter, food, medical and mental health care, legal services, educational and vocational services and an array of housing options, including transitional and permanent housing opportunities, for youth facing homelessness and…
Human Services
4
St Francis Hospital Foundation Inc
We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.
Health
5
N Y C Mission Society
Nyc mission society improves the lives of families in the city's most underserved communities.
Human Services
6
Families Together in New York
Establish a unified voice for children and youth with emotional, behavioral, and social challenges. the organizational mission is to ensure that every family has access to needed information, support and services.
Human Services
7
St Francis Hospital
We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.
Health
8
Global Fund for Children
To advance the rights and opportunities of children and youth worldwide.
Arts & Culture
9
Jewish Family and Children's Service
To support people of all backgrounds to reach their full potential.
Human Services
10
St Catherine of Siena Medical Center
We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.
Health
11
Friends of the Children- New York
Impacting generational change by empowering youth who are facing the greatest obstacles through relationships with professional mentors 12+ years, no matter what.
Crime & Legal
12
Children's Home Society of California
See schedule o the mission of children's home society of california is to provide children, families, and communities with supportive services to thrive.
Human Services
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New York Foundling and the most unlike its peers is East End Hospice Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network
8 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
8/8
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$390,050Human Services$175,000Philanthropy$150,000Recreation & Sports$80,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation ESTATE GEORGE P WAKEFIELD RES TR funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: THE SUMMER CAMP.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~10 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 7 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
7 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 133341224 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on THE SUMMER CAMP, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 10 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 3% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Estate George P Wakefield Res Tr?
Find your warmest path to Estate George P Wakefield Res Tr through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines