Skip to content

· Private foundation

Esserman Family Foundation % Lisa Esserman

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$125k
Granted FY2023
14
Grants FY2023
6
States reached
$20k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Esserman Family Foundation % Lisa Esserman’s FY2024 grant dollars went to The Miami Foundation Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year Esserman Family Foundation % Lisa Esserman named its own grantees at scale: 9 organizations, $125k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

6
’17
5
’18
5
’19
5
’20
5
’21
7
’22
9
’23
0
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$2.4MEducation$255kCivil Rights$95kHealth$66kReligion$55kArts & Culture$38kCrime & Legal$35kAnimals$20kOther$0
02FY2023 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k7 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $100k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Greater Miami Jewish Federation$20,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
American Jewish Committee$15,000
University of Maryland Baltimore Foundation$15,000
Zoo Miami Foundation$10,000
Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative$10,000
Adrienne Arsht Center Foundation$10,000
Temple Beth Am$7,475
Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence$5,000
ACLU of Florida$5,000
Florida Grand Opera$2,500
Civic Chorale of Greater Miami$2,000
Planned Parenthood Federation$2,000
Adrienne Arsht Center Foundation$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Quantum Leap Health Care Collaborative: $15k → 7%Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative: $10k → 10%Quantum Leap Health Care Collaborative: $15k → 7%Quantum Leap Health Care Collaborative: $10k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 49% of Esserman Family Foundation % Lisa Esserman’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 87% of the giving stays in FL; by stated purpose, 85%.

Esserman Family Foundation % Lisa Essermanlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.1% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$539k · 12 repeat orgs$28k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2023, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call). Read against FY2023, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
2

Total granted

$539k
$5k

Still filing today

67%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesCrime & LegalHealthCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $105k · revenue +60%
  • AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE
    4× · 2020–2023 · $60k · revenue +68%
  • QL
    QUANTUM LEAP HEALTHCARE COLLABORATIVE
    4× · 2017–2023 · $50k · revenue +265%

Funded once

  • BB
    Big Brothers and Big Sisters of Miami
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
  • LF
    LYMPHEDEMA FOUNDATION OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Miami
—
2
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
3
Greater Miami Opera Inc

The mission of greater miami opera is to enrich people's lives through an awareness and deeper appreciation of opera. by expanding its reach to diverse communities throughout miami and fort lauderdale and wider audiences abroad creating a…

Arts & Culture
4
Opera Guild Inc of Fort Lauderdale

To enrich people's lives through an awareness and deeper appreciation of opera in broward county.

Arts & Culture
5
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
6
Biscayne Bay Waterkeeper Inc

In 2024, biscayne bay waterkeeper (d/b/a miami waterkeeper) built on our reputation by navigating challenges, seizing opportunities, and continuing our unwavering commitment to safeguarding our precious waterways and finding local…

Environment
7
Americas Society Inc

Americas society is an educational forum which presents programs in its public policy and cultural affairs departments.

International
8
Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Inc

We harness the power of plants for humankind and share the joy and beauty of tropical gardening with everyone. fairchild tropical botanic garden is a museum of tropical plants within a world famous, 83-acre designed landscape. it was…

Environment
9
Adrienne Arsht Center Trust Inc

The adrienne arsht center is a leader in presenting innovative programming that mirrors south florida's diversity, as well as a catalyst for billions of dollars in new development in the downtown area. the center presents nearly 400 events…

Arts & Culture
10
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Florida Chamber of Commerce Foundation Inc

Working in partnership with state business leaders to secure florida's future.

—
12
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Miami Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE MIAMI FOUNDATION INC: $2,222,874 · PhilanthropyTHE MIAMI FOUNDATION INCGREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC: $140,000 · PhilanthropyGREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INCUCSF Foundation - Director's Circle: $130,000 · OtherUCSF Founda…Temple Beth Am: $54,670 · OtherTemple Beth…Individual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual …ACLU of Florida: $20,000 · OtherACLU of Flo…ACLU: $15,000 · OtherCIVIC CHORALE OF GREATER MIAMI INC: $14,000 · OtherZOO MIAMI FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · OtherZOO MIAMI F…PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $14,000 · Other+2 more: $5,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE FOUNDATION INC: $105,000 · EducationAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $60,000 · Civil RightsQUANTUM LEAP HEALTHCARE COLLABORATIVE: $50,000 · Human ServicesBRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE: $35,000 · Crime & LegalADRIENNE ARSHT CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $21,000 · Arts & CultureFLORIDA GRAND OPERA INC: $2,500 · Arts & Culture
Philanthropy$2,362,874Other$292,670Education$105,000Civil Rights$60,000Human Services$50,000Crime & Legal$35,000Arts & Culture$23,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE MIAMI FOUNDATION INC: $2,222,874 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetGREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC: $140,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE FOUNDATION INC: $105,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $60,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetQUANTUM LEAP HEALTHCARE COLLABORATIVE: $50,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE: $35,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetADRIENNE ARSHT CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $21,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetZOO MIAMI FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCIVIC CHORALE OF GREATER MIAMI INC: $14,000 over 7y, 5.4% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $14,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFLORIDA GRAND OPERA INC: $2,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE MIAMI FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
  • Who funds QUANTUM LEAP HEALTHCARE COLLABORATIVE ↗
  • Who funds BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE ↗
  • Who funds ADRIENNE ARSHT CENTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ZOO MIAMI FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CIVIC CHORALE OF GREATER MIAMI INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds FLORIDA GRAND OPERA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Esserman Family Foundation % Lisa Esserman funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Esserman Family Foundation % Lisa Esserman. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • University of Maryland Baltimore Foundation Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Zoo Miami Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Esserman Family Foundation % Lisa Esserman?

Find your warmest path to Esserman Family Foundation % Lisa Esserman through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Esserman Family Foundation % Lisa Esserman’s filings →

More from the funding graph